Luo Zhendong, Cui Gonghao, Qiao Yibo

Keywords： Regional Planning; Development Stage; Planning Thought; Practical Action; China

Abstract：

Regional planning in China constitutes an integral part of the global history of regional planning. The evolution of Chinese regional planning theories and practices should be understood, interpreted, and compared in a broader, international context. As an important tool for regional governance, the approach to regional planning will inevitably bear characteristics that are distinctive to a specific country and time; whereas the dynamics in the evolution of regional planning theories and practices also comes from adapting to specific development stages in certain countries and regions. Over the last 70 years since the founding of the People’s Republic of China, while being exposed to the influence of global theories and practices, China has seen its regional planning in constant adjustments to seek better alignment between the development stage, planning thought, and practical actions. Along with the continuous advancing of China’s modernization and urbanization, the understanding of development stage gets clearer, the competition among different interest groups becomes increasingly tough, and the practical actions get more diversified. With that, China’s grasp of trends and patterns in regional planning has been gradually improved. This paper aims to figure out the correlations between urbanization in China and in the world, especially in Western developed countries, to relate different stages to one another. Therefore, Chinese planning thought and practical actions over the past seven decades can be reviewed with a frame of reference, with which China’s response to international trends in various stages can be evaluated. As conclusions, this paper establishes the correlations between development stages, planning thoughts, and practical actions. Furthermore, based on the judgment on China’s urbanization trends, this paper identifies the directions for innovation on China’s regional planning.

Funds：

• [1] 武廷海. 中国近现代区域规划[M]. 清华大学出版社, 2006.
  [2] 罗震东. 经验、规律与知识：新时期国际规划历史研究的任务[J]. 国际城市规划, 2018, 33(3): 1-3.
  [3] 林毅夫. 后发优势与后发劣势——与杨小凯教授商榷[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2003, 2(4): 989-1004.
  [4] 王建军, 吴志强. 1950 年后世界主要国家城镇化发展——轨迹分析与类型分组[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2007(6): 47-53.
  [5] 焦秀琦. 世界城市化发展的S 型曲线[J]. 城市规划, 1987(2): 34-38.
  [6] 戴维·古德菲尔德. 美国城市史百科全书[M]. 陈恒, 李文硕, 曹升生, 等译. 上海三联书店, 2018.
  [7] 张京祥, 罗震东. 中国当代城乡规划思潮[M]. 东南大学出版社, 2013.
  [8] 崔功豪, 王兴平. 当代区域规划导论[M]. 东南大学出版社, 2006.
  [9] 方中权, 陈烈. 区域规划理论的演进[J]. 地理科学, 2007, 27(4): 480-485.
  [10] 雅诺什·科尔奈. 社会主义体制[M]. 张安, 译. 中央编译出版社, 2007.
  [11] 翟国方. 日本国土规划的演变及启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2009, 24(4): 85-90.
  [12] 胡序威. 中国区域规划的演变与展望[J]. 城市规划, 2006, 30(增刊): 8-12.
  [13] 王红扬. 我国区域规划的第三轮繁荣期——重审“综合规划”作为城市规划的核心方法[M] // 翟国方, 张京祥, 王红扬, 编. 城市与区域规划评论. 南京大学出版社, 2012: 20-36.
  [14] 王兴平, 陈骁, 赵四东. 改革开放以来中国城乡规划的国际化发展研究[J]. 规划师, 2018(10): 5-12.
  [15] 朱金, 赵民. 从结构性失衡到均衡——我国城镇化发展的现实状况与未来趋势[J]. 上海城市规划, 2014(1): 47-55.
  [16] 张京祥, 林怀策, 陈浩. 中国空间规划体系40 年的变迁与改革[J]. 经济地理, 2018(7): 1-6.
  [17] 罗震东. 科学转型视角下的中国城乡规划学科建设元思考[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2012(2): 54-60.