Yang Shan

Keywords： Interim Use; Concept; Characteristics; Mechanism; Urban Design; Urban Planning; Methodology

Abstract：

Currently, Chinese cities are entering into a new phase of inventory regeneration. In terms of multiple land-use, inventory regeneration study, urban crisis management, etc., this research on “interim use” can offer new ideas and open up a new frontier. The paper firstly describes its development and studies on European countries exemplified by Germany. Compared with the European studies, the paper enumerates the development state of “interim use” in urban China exemplified by Shanghai, and also briefly examines the relevant research in China. On the basis of the preceding work, it explores the concept, characteristics, and mechanism of “interim use”. It is defined as a kind of use-mode which exists in the transitional period from an original use-mode imposed on a space to a new one. Its activities have not been stipulated and coded and are not necessarily related with the original or new mode. With provisionality, instability, spatial vacancy as its characteristics, its mechanism depends on the value contrast between the one created by the interim use and the one by the anticipated use. Finally, the paper summarizes the meaning and necessity to make such research on “interim use” in the context of urban China.

Funds：

• [1] HONECK T. Zwischennutzung als soziale innovation: von alternativen lebensentwürfen zu verfahren der r?umlichen planung[J]. Innovationen in die r?umlichen planung, 2015(3): 219-232.
  [2] 克里斯蒂安·博里特“. 空地”——对城市公共空间的建设性概念[M] // 根特城市研究小组. 城市状态：当代大城市的空间、社区和本质. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社、知识产权出版社, 2005: 275-293.
  [3] DE SOLA-MORALES I. Terrain vague[M] // DAVIDSON C. Anyplace.
  New York, Cambridge: Anyone Corporation, 1995: 118-123.
  [4] Urban Catalyst. Patterns of the unplanned[M] // FRANCK K A, STEVENS Q. Loose space: possibility and diversity in urban life. New York: Abingdon, 2007: 271-288.
  [5] 戴维· 哈维. 后现代的状况[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2004.
  [6] H?U?ERMANN H, SIEBEL W. Die chancen des schrumpfens[N]. Die Zeit, 1985-03-22 (33-37).
  [7] COLOMB C. Pushing the urban frontier: temporary uses of space, city marketing, and the creative city discourse in 2000s Berlin[J]. Journal of urban affairs, 2012, 34(2): 131-152.
  [8] SASSEN S. The informal economy: between new developments and old regulations[J]. Yale law journal, 1994, 103(8): 2289-2304.
  [9] SHAW K. The place of alternative culture and the politics of its protection in Berlin, Amsterdam and Melbourne[J]. Planning theory & practice, 2005, 6(2): 149-169.
  [10] GROTH J, CORIJN E. Reclaiming urbanity: indeterminate spaces, informal actors and urban agenda setting[J]. Urban studies, 2005, 42(3): 503-526.
  [11] ANDRES L. Differential spaces, power hierarchy and collaborative planning: a critique of the role of temporary uses in shaping and making places[J]. Urban studies, 2013, 50(4): 759-775.
  [12] PRADELLE M D L, LALLEMENT E. Paris plage:“ the city is ours” [J]. The annals of the American academy of political and social science, 2004, 595(1): 134-145.
  [13] STEVENS Q, AMBLER M. Europe’s city beaches as post-fordist placemaking[J]. Journal of urban design, 2010, 15(4): 515-537.
  [14] Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung. Zwischennutzung und neue freifl?chen. st?dtische lebensr?ume der zukunft[R]. Bonn: Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, 2004.
  [15] Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung. Zwischennutzungen und nischen im st?dtebau als beitrag für eine nachhaltige stadtentwicklung[R]. Bonn: Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, 2008.
  [16] BORNMANN F, ERBELDING D, FROESSLER D R. Zwischennutzungen tempor?e nutzungen als instrument der stadtentwicklung[R]. Düsseldorf: Innovationsagentur Stadtumbau NRW, 2008.
  [17] ZwischenZeitZentrale Bremen. Schlafende h?user wecken! dokumentation der ZwischenZeitZentrale Bremen (ZZZ) 2009-2012[R]. Bremen: SWAH, Senator für Wirtschaft, Arbeit und H?fen, 2012.
  [18] HENTIL? H, LINDBORG T. Central micro-peripheries: temporary uses ofcentral residual spaces as urban development  catalysts[C]. Jyv?skyl?: ERSA, 2003: 27-30.
  [19] HAYDN F, TEMEL R. Tempor?re r?ume: konzepte zur stadtnutzung[M]. Basel: Birkh?user, 2006.
  [20] Urban Catalyst. Urban catalysts: strategies for temporary uses-potential for development of urban residua areas in European metropolises[R]. Berlin, 2003.
  [21] OSWALT P, OVERMEYER K, MISSELWITZ P. Urban catalyst: the power of temporary use[M]. Berlin: DOM Publishers, 2013.
  [22] Urban Unlimited. The shadow city, freezones in Brussel and Rotterdam[R]. Rotterdam: Urban Unlimited, 2003.
  [23] ANGST M, KLAUS P, MICHAELIS T, et al. Zone* imaginaire: argumente und instrumente für zwischennutzungen in der Schweiz[R]. Zürich, 2008.
  [24] LYDON M, GARCIA A. Tactical urbanism: short-term action for long-term change[M]. Washington: Island Press, 2015.
  [25] 董一平, 侯斌超. 工业建筑遗产保护与再生的“临时性使用”模式——以瑞士温特图尔苏尔泽工业区为例[J]. 城市建筑, 2012(3): 19-23.
  [26] 董楠楠. 联邦德国城市复兴中的开放空间临时使用策略[J]. 国际城市规划, 2011, 26(5): 105-108.
  [27] 多莉斯· 赫斯, 王琳, 李博. 过渡性开放空间：城市开放空间开发中兴起的临时使用现象[J]. 城市环境设计, 2007(3): 87-92.
  [28] 陈蔚镇, 刘荃. 城市更新中非正式开发景观项目的潜质与价值[J]. 中国园林, 2016(5): 32-36.
  [29] ROY A, ALSAYYAD N. Urban informality: transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America and South Asia[M]. Oxford: Lexington Books, 2004.
  [30] 姚存卓. 浅析规划管理部门在存量土地管理中存在的问题与解决途径[J]. 规划师, 2009, 25(10): 81-84.
  [31] 邹兵. 增量规划、存量规划与政策规划[J]. 城市规划, 2013(2): 35-37.
  [32] 邹兵. 增量规划向存量规划转型：理论解析与实践应对[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2015(5): 12-19.
  [33] 赵燕菁. 城市规划的下一个三十年[J]. 北京规划建设, 2014(1): 168-170.
  [34] 赵燕菁. 存量规划：理论与实践[J]. 北京规划建设, 2014(4): 153-156.
  [35] 施卫良, 邹兵, 金忠民, 等. 面对存量和减量的总体规划[J]. 城市规划, 2014, 38(11): 16-21.
  [36] 冯立, 唐子来. 产权制度视角下的划拨工业用地更新：以上海市虹口区为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2013(5): 23-29.
  [37] 卢丹梅. 规划：走向存量改造与旧区更新——“三旧”改造规划思路探索[J]. 城市发展研究, 2013, 20(6): 43-48.
  [38] 杨锐. 景观城市主义在工业废弃地改造中的应用——以美国马萨诸塞州军事保护区的景观再生为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2008, 23(10): 71-76.
  [39] 刘抚英, 栗德祥. 工业废弃地土地更新利用的框架、模式与程序[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2009(3): 69-74.
  [40] 王云才, 赵岩. 美国城市工业废弃地景观再生的经验与启示[J]. 南方建筑, 2011(3): 22-26.
  [41] KOLL-SCHRETZENMAYR M. Strategien zur umnutzung von industrieund gewerbebra-chen. Zürich[M]. Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG, 2000.
  [42] OTTO B. Zwischennutzungen in Berlin: die motive der akteure und die rolle der stadtplanung[D]. Berlin: Humboldt-Universit?t zu Berlin, 2015.
  [43] JANSON A, TIGGES F. Fundamental concepts of architecture: the vocabulary of spatial situations[M]. Basel: Birkh?user, 2014: 350.
  [44] 杨振山, 孙艺芸. 城市收缩现象、过程与问题[J]. 人文地理, 2015(4): 6-10.
  [45] 王富海, 孙施文, 周剑云. 城市规划：从终极蓝图到动态规划——动态规划实践与理论[J]. 城市规划, 2013, 37(1): 70-78.