Wang De, Yin Zhenxuan, Yu Xiaotian

Keywords： Mixed Land Use; Model; Measure; Effect; Abroad

Abstract：

Mixed land use has been considered as an important tool to strength urban vitality and to achieve sustainable development. At present, China’s related research mainly focuses on policy guidance for mixed land use in planning practice, while the discussion on the models, measures and effects of mixed land use is insufficient. This paper sorts out concept, types, measures and effects of mixed land use abroad in order to fully grasp the international research fronts. In terms of concept, a multi-level, multi-type, multi-scale research framework formed. In terms of measures, researchers have proposed different methods and compared their advantages and disadvantages. In terms of effects, firstly, mixed land use has significant positive effects on non-motorized transportation and health; secondly, the effects of mixed land use on safety and housing price are affected by other conditions; thirdly, the impact on vitality needs further empirical research.

Funds：

• [1] GRANT J. Mixed use in theory and practice: Canadian experience with implementing a planning principle[J]. Journal of the American planning association, 2002, 68(1): 71-84.
  [2] HOPPENBROUWER E, LOUW E. Mixed-use development: theory and practice in Amsterdam’s Eastern Docklands[J]. European planning studies, 2005,13(7): 967-983.
  [3] HERNDON J D. Mixed-use development in theory and practice: learning from Atlanta’s mixed experiences[D]. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2011.
  [4] JACOBS J. The death and life of great American cities[M]. New York: Random House, 1993.
  [5] KONG H, SUI D Z, TONG X, et al. Paths to mixed-use development: a case study of southern Changping in Beijing, China[J]. Cities, 2015, 44: 94-103.
  [6] 许思扬, 陈振光. 混合功能发展概念解读与分类探讨[J]. 规划师, 2012(7): 105-109.
  [7] 张衔春, 胡国华. 美国新城市主义运动：发展、批判与反思[J]. 国际城市规划, 2016(3): 40-48.
  [8] HANDY S. Smart growth and the transportation-land use connection: what does the research tell us?[J]. International regional science review, 2005, 28(2): 146-167.
  [9] BURTON E. The compact city: just or just compact? a preliminary analysis[J]. Urban studies, 2000, 37(11): 1969-2001.
  [10] 王丹, 王士君. 美国“新城市主义”与“精明增长”发展观解读[J]. 国际城市规划, 2007, 22(2): 61-66.
  [11] 彭晖. 紧凑城市的再思考——紧凑城市在我国应用中应当关注的问题[J]. 国际城市规划, 2008(5): 83-87.
  [12] 邹兵. 增量规划、存量规划与政策规划[J]. 城市规划, 2013, 37(2): 35-37.
  [13] 钱云. 存量规划时代城市规划师的角色与技能——两个海外案例的启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2016(4): 79-83.
  [14] 郭嵘, 黄梦石. 存量规划视角下城市开发边界的划定方法[J]. 规划师, 2016(10): 57-61.
  [15] ROWLEY A. Mixed-use development: ambiguous concept, simplistic analysis and wishful thinking?[J]. Planning practice and research, 1996, 11(1): 85-97.
  [16] DOVEY K, PAFKA E. What is functional mix? an assemblage approach[J]. Planning theory & practice, 2017, 18(2): 249-267.
  [17] INSTITUTE U L. Mixed-use development handbook[M]. Washington: Urban Land Institute, 2003.
  [18] 黄毅. 城市混合功能建设研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2008.
  [19] COUPLAND A. Reclaiming the city: mixed use development[M]. London: E & FN Spon, 1997.
  [20] JACOBS-CRISIONI C, RIETVELD P, KOOMEN E, et al. Evaluating the impact of land-use density and mix on spatiotemporal urban activity patterns: an exploratory study using mobile phone data[J]. Environment and planning a, 2014, 46(11): 2769-2785.
  [21] YANG X. Exploring the influence of environmental features on residential burglary using spatial-temporal pattern analysis[D]. Gainesville: University of Florida, 2006.
  [22] BROWN B B, YAMADA I, SMITH K R, et al. Mixed land use and walkability: variations in land use measures and relationships with BMI, overweight, and obesity[J]. Health & place, 2009, 15(4): 1130-1141.
  [23] SONG Y, MERLIN L, RODRIGUEZ D. Comparing measures of urban land use mix[J]. Computers, environment and urban systems, 2013, 42(7): 1-13.
  [24] HESS P M, MOUDON A V, LOGSDON M G. Measuring land use patterns for transportation research[J]. Transportation research record, 2001, 1780(1): 17-24.
  [25] CERVERO R, KOCKELMAN K. Travel demand and the 3ds: density, diversity, and design[J]. Transportation research part d: transport and environment, 1997, 2(3): 199-219.
  [26] MOUDON A V, LEE C, CHEADLE A D, et al. Operational definitions of walkable neighborhood: theoretical and empirical insights[J]. Journal of physical activity and health, 2006, 3(Supplement 1): 99-117.
  [27] TAYLOR R, A. KOONS B, M. KURTZ E, et al. Street blocks with more nonresidential land use have more physical deterioration: evidence from Baltimore and Philadelphia[J]. Urban affairs review, 1995, 31(1): 120-136.
  [28] CERVERO R. Mixed land-uses and commuting: evidence from the American housing survey[J]. Transportation research part a, 1996, 30(5): 361-377.
  [29] CERVERO R, DUNCAN M. Which reduces vehicle travel more: jobshousing balance or retail-housing mixing?[J]. Journal of the American planning, 2006, 72(4): 475-490.
  [30] MILLER J S. Impact of jobs-housing balance on average jurisdiction commuting times[J]. Transportation research record, 2011, 2244(1): 18-26.
  [31] EWING R, CERVERO R. Travel and the built environment: a synthesis[J]. Transportation research record, 2001, 1780(1): 265-294.
  [32] EWING R, CERVERO R. Travel and the built-environment[J]. Journal of the American planning association, 2010, 76(3): 265-294.
  [33] MCCONVILLE M E, RODRíGUEZ D A, CLIFTON K, et al. Disaggregate land uses and walking[J]. American journal of preventive medicine, 2010, 40(1): 25-32.
  [34] FRANK L D, PIVO G. Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: single-occupant vehicle, transit, walking[J]. Transportation research record, 1994, 1466: 44-52.
  [35] EWING R, GREENWALD M, ZHANG M, et al. Traffic generated by mixed-use developments-six-region study using consistent built environmental measures[J]. Journal of urban planning and development, 2011, 137(3): 248-261.
  [36] FRANK L D, SCHMID T L, SALLIS J F, et al. Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form findings from SMARTRAQ[J]. American journal of preventive medicine, 2005, 28(2): 117-125.
  [37] RODRíGUEZ D A, KHATTAK A J, EVENSON K R. Can new urbanism encourage physical activity? comparing a new urbanist neighborhood with conventional suburbs[J]. Journal of the American planning association, 2006, 72(1): 43-54.
  [38] FRANK L D, SALLIS J F, CONWAY T L, et al. Many pathways from land use to health[J]. Journal of American planning association, 2006, 72(1): 75-87.
  [39] STEVENSON M, THOMPSON J, DE Sá T H, et al. Land use, transport, and population health: estimating the health benefits of compact cities[J]. Lancet, 2016, 388: 2925-2935.
  [40] SHAPLAND J, VAGG J. Policing by the public[M]. London: Routledge, 1988.
  [41] FOWLER E P. Street management and city design[J]. Social forces, 1987, 66(2): 365-389.
  [42] ANDERSON J M, MACDONALD J M, BLUTHENTHAL R, et al. Reducing crime by shaping the built environment with zoning: an empirical study of Los Angeles[J]. Social science electronic publishing, 2013, 161(3): 699-756.
  [43] RONCEK D W, MAIER P A. Bars, blocks, and crimes revisited: linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of “hot spots”[J]. Criminology, 1991, 29(4): 725-753.
  [44] RONCEK D W, FAGGIANI D. High schools and crime: a replication[J].The sociological quarterly, 1985, 26(4): 491-505.
  [45] DUFFALA D C. Convenience stores, armed robbery, and physical environmental features[J]. American behavior scientist, 1976, 20(2): 227-245.
  [46] BRANTINGHAM P L, BRANTINGHAM P J. Mobility, notoriety, and crime: a study of crime patterns in urban nodal points[J]. Journal of environmental systems, 1982, 11(1): 89-99.
  [47] GORMAN D M, SPEER P W, GRUENEWALD P J, et al. Spatial dynamics of alcohol availability, neighborhood structure and violent crime[J]. Journal of studies on alcohol, 2001, 62(5): 628-636.
  [48] SMITH W R, FRAZEE S G, DAVISON E L. Furthering the integration of routine activity and social disorganization theories: small units of analysis and the study of street robbery as a diffusion process[J]. Criminology, 2000, 38(2): 489-524.
  [49] BROWNING C R, BYRON R A, CALDER C A, et al. Commercial density, residential concentration, and crime: land use patterns and violence in neighborhood context[J]. Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 2010, 47(3): 329-357.
  [50] KOSTER H R A, ROUWENDAL J. The impact of mixed land use on residential property values[J]. Journal of regional science, 2012, 52(5): 733-761.
  [51] SONG Y, KNAAP G. Measuring the effects of mixed land uses on housing values[J]. Regional science & urban economics, 2004, 34(6): 663-680.