Zhao Ke, Li Zhongwei, Xia Qingqing

Keywords： Spatial Planning; Communicative Rationality; Collaborative Planning; Visual Language; Truth; Value

Abstract：

After the setting up of the Ministry of Natural Resources in China, the planning system with the core of spatial planning will face new reform. But there are many uncertain factors about the system, contents and method of spatial planning before the relevant laws and legislation amendment. Aiming to explore the certain contents in spatial planning, we eye on the four decades development of European Spatial Planning, find the “communication” and “collaborative planning rich on communicative rationality” are the cornerstone and theoretical foundation, the “visual communication and collaborative platform” shows both “truth” and “value”is the certain content and decision support in all kind of spatial planning systems in different European countries. So we conclude and outlook the method how to form the visual language which can show “truth” and “value”simultaneously, hope to provide certain support for spatial planning which will be carried on in my country.

Funds：

• [1] European Regional/Spatial Planning Charter（Torremolinos Charter）[R]. Torremolinos（Spain）: European Conference of Ministers Responsible for Regional Planning, 1983.

  [2] 景娟, 钱云, 黄哲姣. 欧洲一体化的空间规划: 发展历程及其对我国的借鉴[J]. 城市发展研究, 2011,18(6): 1-6.

  [3] Communities E. The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies[R]. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1997.

  [4] Commission E. ESDP, European Spatial Development Perspective: towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European Union[R]. The Informal Council of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning, 1999.

  [5] WONG C. Is there a need for a fully integrated spatial planning framework for the United Kingdom[J]. Planning theory & practice, 2002, 3(3): 277-300.

  [6] Green paper on territorial cohesion: turning territorial diversity into strength[R]. Brussels: Commission of The European Communities, 2008.

  [7] FALUDI A. European spatial planning: past, present and future[M] // MATERN A, L?WIS S V, BRUNS A. Integration - Aktuelle Anforderungen und Strategien in der Stadt-, Raum- und Umweltplanung : 12. Junges Forum der ARL, 10. bis 12. Juni 2009 in Hamburg. Hannover: Verl. d. ARL, 2010: 9-26.

  [8] 钱慧, 罗震东. 欧盟“空间规划”的兴起、理念及启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2011(3): 66-71.

  [9] NADIN V. Spatial planning and EU competence: draft paper for European Council of Town Planners[C]. ESDP Conference, 2002.

  [10] 刘慧, 樊杰, 王传胜. 欧盟空间规划研究进展及启示[J]. 地理研究, 2008(6): 1381-1389.

  [11] SANDERCOCK L. The death of modernist planning: radical praxis for a postmodern age[M] // DOUGLASS M, FRIEDMANN J. Cities for citizens: planning and the rise of civil society in a global age. Chichester, New York: Wiley, 1998: 163-184.

  [12] FALUDI A. A reader in planning theory[M]. New York: Pergamon Press, 1973.

  [13] MCLOUGHLIN J B. Urban and regional planning: a systems approach[M]. London: Faber and Faber, 1969.

  [14] FALUDI A. Rationality, critical rationalism, and planning doctrine[M] //MANDELBAUM S J, MAZZA L, BURCHELL R W. Explorations in planning theory. New Brunswick NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, State University of New Jersey, 1996: 65-82.

  [15] LONG N E. Planning and politics in urban development[J]. Journal of the American institute of planners, 1959, 25(4): 167-169.

  [16] LINDBLOM C E. The science of “muddling through”[J]. Public administration review, 1959,19(2): 79-88.

  [17] HABERMAS J. The theory of communicative action: vol.i, reason and the rationalisation of society[M]. London: Heinemann, 1984.

  [18] 曹康, 王晖. 从工具理性到交往理性——现代城市规划思想内核与理论的变迁[J]. 城市规划, 2009(9): 44-51.

  [19] INNES J E. Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: communicative action and interactive practice[J]. Journal of planning education and research, 1992,14(3): 183-189.

  [20] HEALEY P. Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies[M]. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1997.

  [21] FORESTER J. Planning in the face of power[M]. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1989.

  [22] GROUPS W. Study programme on European Spatial Planning Final Report[R]. Brussels/Stockholm: National Focal Points and the European Commission, 2000.

  [23] ULIED A, Making Europe open and polycentric[R]. Report in METREX Conference, 2014.

  [24] STIENS G. Raumentwicklungsszenarien aus Nachbarstaaten[J]. Einführung: informationen zur raumentwicklung, 2004(1/2): i-ix.

  [25] Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, ed. Szenarien zur Raumentwicklung. Raum- und Siedlungsstrukturen Deutschlands 2015/2040[R], Forschungen, Heft 112. Bonn, 2003.

  [26] TAYLOR D R F. Chapter 1-geographic information systems: the microcomputer and modern cartography[M] // TAYLOR D R F. Modern cartography. Oxford/New York: Pergamon, 1991: 1-21.

  [27] KRAAK M J, ORMELING F J. Cartography: visualization of geospatial data[M]. The UK: Pearson Education Limited, 2010: 104.

  [28] DüHR S. The visual language of spatial planning: exploring cartographic representations for spatial planning in Europe[M]. New York: Routledge, 2007: 58.

  [29] BRUNET R, Les villes‘européennes’. Rapport pour la DATAR, 1989.

  [30] GROVES R. “Designed data” and “organic data”[EB/OL]. (2011-05-31)[2019-03-26]. http://directorsblog.blogs.census.gov/2011/05/31/designeddata-and-organic-data.html.

  [31] 赵珂, 于立. 大规划：大数据时代的参与式地理设计[J]. 城市发展研究, 2014(10): 28-32.

  [32] FARMAN J. Mapping the digital empire: google earth and the process of postmodern cartography[J]. New media & society, 2011,12(6): 869-888.