[1] ADAMS N, COTELLA G, NUNES R. Territorial development, cohesion and spatial planning: building on EU enlargement[M]. London: Routledge, 2012.
[2] BACHE I. Europeanization and multi-level governance: cohesion policy in the European Union and Britain[M]. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008.
[3] BACHTLER J, MCMASTER I. EU cohesion policy and the role of the regions: investigating the influence of structural funds in the new member states[J]. Environment and planning c: government and policy, 2008, 26(2): 398-427.
[4] BACHTLER J, MENDEZ C, ORA?E H. From conditionality to europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: Administrative performance and capacity in cohesion policy[J]. European planning studies, 2014, 22: 735-757.
[5] BAFOIL F, BEAUMELOU F, GUYET R, et al. Jumelages institutionnels: les limites d’un apprentissage collectif[J]. Critique internationale, 2004, 25(4): 157-167.
[6] B?HME K, WATERHOUT B. The europeanization of planning[M] // FLAUDI A, ed. European spatial research and planning. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2008: 225-248.
[7] BRUSIS M. Between EU requirements, competitive politics, and national traditions: re-creating regions in the accession countries of Central and Eastern Europe[J]. Governance, 2002, 15(4): 531-559.
[8] BUZOGáNY A, KORKUT U. Administrative reform and regional development discourses in Hungary. Europeanisation going nuts?[J]. Europe-Asia studies, 2013, 65(8): 1555-1577.
[9] Committee on Spatial Development. ESDP European spatial development perspective towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European Union[M]. Brussels: European Commission, 1999.
[10] COTELLA G. Spatial planning in Poland between European influence and dominant market forces[M] // REIMER M, GETIMIS P, BLOTEVOGEL H H, eds. Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe: a comparative perspective on continuity and changes. London: Routledge, 2014: 255-277.
[11] COTELLA G, RIVOLIN U J. A conceptual device for spreading (good) territorial governance in Europe. ESPON scientific report[M]. Luxembourg: ESPON, 2014.
[12] D?BROWSKI M. Europeanizing sub-national governance: partnership in the implementation of European Union structural funds in Poland[J]. Regional studies, 2011, 47(8): 1-12.
[13] D?BROWSKI M. Shallow or deep Europeanisation? the uneven impact of EU cohesion policy on the regional and local authorities in Poland[J]. Environment and planning c: government and policy, 2012, 30(4): 730-745.
[14] D?BROWSKI M. EU Cohesion policy, horizontal partnership and the patterns of sub-national governance: insights from Central and Eastern Europe[J]. European urban and regional studies, 2014, 21(3): 364-383.
[15] D?BROWSKI M, BACHTLER J, BAFOIL F. Challenges of multi-level governance and partnership: drawing lessons from European Union cohesion policy[J]. European urban and regional studies, 2014, 21(4): 355-363.
[16] DüHR S, COLOMB C, NADIN V. European spatial planning and territorial cooperation[M]. London: Routledge, 2010.
[17] FALUDI A. From European spatial development to territorial cohesion policy[J]. Regional studies, 2006, 40(6): 667-678.
[18] FALUDI A. Territorial cohesion policy and the European model of society[J]. European planning studies, 2007, 15(4): 567-583.
[19] FALUDI A. Centenary paper: European spatial planning: past, present and future[J]. Town planning review, 2010, 81(1): 1-22.
[20] FALUDI A, WATERHOUT B. The making of the European spatial development perspective: no masterplan[M]. London: Routledge, 2002.
[21] FERRY M, MCMASTER I. Implementing structural funds in Polish and Czech regions: convergence, variation, empowerment?[J]. Regional & federal studies, 2005, 15(1): 19-39.
[22] FERRY M, MCMASTER I. Cohesion policy and the evolution of regional policy in Central and Eastern Europe[J]. Europe-Asia studies, 2013, 65(8):1502-1528.
[23] FINKA M. 5 evolving frameworks for regional development and spatial planning in the new regions of the EU[M] // ADAMS N, COTELLA G, NUNES R, eds. Territorial development, cohesion and spatial planning: building on EU enlargement. London: Routledge, 2012: 103-122.
[24] HALL P, TAYLOR R. Political science and the three new institutionalisms[J]. Political studies, 1996, 44(5): 936-957.
[25] HLADíK J, KOPECKY V. Public administration reform in the Czech Republic[J]. Research paper, 2013: 1-34.
[26] HOOGHE L. Building a Europe with the regions: the changing role of the European Commission[M] // HOOGHE L, ed. Cohesion policy and European integration. building multi-level governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996: 89-128.
[27] HUGHES J, SASSE G, Gordon C. Conditionality and compliance in the EU's eastward enlargement: regional policy and the reform of sub-national government[J]. JCMS: Journal of common market studies, 2004, 42(3): 523-551.
[28] KOVáCS I P. Regionalization in Hungary: options and scenarios on the “road to Europe”[M] // SCOTT J W, ed. Decoding new regionalism. shifting socio-political contexts in Central Europe and Latin America. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009: 199-214.
[29] KOVáCS I P. Local governance in Hungary – the balance of the last 20 years[D]. Discussion Papers Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 2011.
[30] KOVáCS I P, PARASKEVOPOULOS C, HORVáTH G. Institutional ‘legacies’ and the shaping of regional governance in Hungary[J]. Regional & federal studies, 2004, 14(3): 430-460.
[31] MAHONEY J. Path Dependence in historical sociology[J]. Theory and society, 2000, 29(4): 507-548.
[32] MAHONEY J, THELEN K. Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[33] MAIER K. 11 The Pursuit of Balanced Territorial Development[M] // ADAMS N, COTELLA G, NUNES R, eds. Territorial development, cohesion and spatial planning: knowledge and policy development in an enlarged EU. London: Routledge, 2011: 266-290.
[34] MAIER K. Changing planning in the Czech Republic[M] // REIMER M, GETIMIS P, BLOTEVOGEL H, eds. Spatial planning systems and practices
in Europe. a comparative perspective on continuity and changes. New York: Routledge, 2014: 215-235.
[35] MALY J, OND?EJ M. European territorial cohesion policies: parallels to socialist central planning?[J]. Moravian geographical reports, 2016, 24(1): 14-26.
[36] MANZELLA G P, MENDEZ C. The turning points of EU cohesion policy[M]. Brussels: European Commission, 2009.
[37] MILIO S. Can administrative capacity explain differences in regional performances? evidence from structural funds implementation in southern Italy[J]. Regional studies, 2007, 41(4): 429-442.
[38] MILIO S. The conflicting effects of multi-level governance and the partnership principle: evidence from the Italian experience[J]. European urban & regional studies, 2014, 2(4): 384-397.
[39] NEDOVI?-BUDI? Z. Adjustment of planning practice to the new Eastern and Central European context[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2001, 67(1): 38-52.
[40] OECD. Territorial reviews: Poland 2008[R]. OECD, 2008
[41] OECD. How regions grow: trends and analysis[R]. OECD, 2009.
[42] PALLAGST K M, MERCIER G. Urban and regional planning in Central and Eastern European countries – from EU requirements to innovative practices[M] // STANILOV K, ed. The post-socialist city. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007: 473-490.
[43] PIERSON P, SKOCPOL T. Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science[M] // KATZNELSON I, MILNER V H, eds. Political science: the state of the discipline. New York: W. W. Norton: 693-721.
[44] POLVERARI L, BACHTLER J. The contribution of European structural funds to territorial cohesion[J]. Town planning review, 2005, 76(1): 29-42.
[45] POLVERARI L, MCMASTER I, GROSS F, et al. Strategic planning for structural funds in 2007-2013. a review of strategies and programmes[C]. 20th IQ-Net Conference, Glasgow, 2006.
[46] REGULSKI J. Local government reform in Poland: an insider’s story[M]. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, 2003.
[47] REIMER M, GETIMIS P, BLOTEVOGEL H. Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe: a comparative perspective on continuity and changes[M]. New York: Routledge, 2014.
[48] SCHERPEREEL J A. EU cohesion policy and the europeanization of Central and East European regions[J]. Regional & federal studies, 2010, 20(1): 45-62.
[49] SCHIMMELFENNIG F, SEDELMEIER U. Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe[J]. Journal of European public policy, 2004, 11(4): 661-679.
[50] SEDELMEIER U. Is Europeanisation through conditionality sustainable? lock-in of institutional change after EU accession[J]. West European politics, 2011, 35(1): 20-38.
[51] SORENSEN A. Taking path dependence seriously: an historical institutionalist research agenda in planning history[J]. Planning perspectives, 2015, 30(1): 17-38.
[52] STEAD D, COTELLA G. Differential Europe: domestic actors and their role in shaping spatial planning systems[J]. DisP-the planning review, 2011,47(186): 13-21.
[53] STEAD D, NADIN V. Shi f ts in territorial governance and the europeanization of spatial planning in Central and Eastern Europe[M] // ADAMS N, COTELLA G, NUNES R, eds. Territorial development, cohesion and spatial planning. knowledge and policy development in an enlarged EU. London: Routledge, 2011: 154-177.
[54] SWIANIEWICZ P. Size of local government, local democracy and effciency in delivery of local services-international context and theoretical framework[M] // SWIANIEWICZ P, ed. Consolidation or fragmentation?
the size of local government in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: Open Society Institute, 2002: 5-29.
[55] VARRó K, FARAGó L. The politics of spatial policy and governance in post-1990 Hungary: the interplay between European and national discourses of space[J]. European planning studies, 2016, 24(1): 39-60.
[56] WBU. Studium Zagospodarowania Przestrzennego Pogranicza Polsko-Czeskiego[R]. Warsaw: Ministry of Infrastructure and Construction of Poland/Ministry of Development of the Czech Republic, 2004.