Chen Yujie, Li Ziqing, Ding Kaili, Yuan Yuan

Keywords： Urban Studies; Research Review; CiteSpace; Visualized Analysis ； Academic Journal

Abstract：

Under the background of new urbanization, urban theories and practices of foreign academic journals have been important sources of Chinese counterparts. This paper makes statistical and visualized analysis on journals of Cities, Urban Studies, Habitat International, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research from 2010 to 2017, displaying in the following aspects: time distribution of papers, numbers of papers, research focuses, research trends, research contents, and so on. Then this paper classifies the research contents into six parts, including “the economic research under the background of globalization” “social space research from the perspective of humanism”“governance, institution and policy” “urban regeneration and gentrification”“neighborhood and community research from micro-perspective” and “integration research with other disciplines”. It is expected to provide instructions and references to Chinese urban research and practices.

Funds：

• [1] 李彤玥, 牛品一, 顾朝林. 弹性城市研究框架综述[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2014(5): 23-31.

  [2] 董宏伟, 寇永霞. 智慧城市的批判与实践——国外文献综述[J]. 城市规划, 2014, 38(11): 52-58.

  [3] 袁媛, 陈金城. 近十年英国城市规划研究——以《城镇规划评论》期刊为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2015, 144(1): 78-85.

  [4] 黄建中, 刘媛, 桑劲. 2006—2011 年间《城市规划学刊》的统计及分析[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2012(3): 53-62.

  [5] TSUKAMOTO T. Neoliberalization of the developmental state: Tokyo’s bottom-up politics and state rescaling in Japan[J]. International journal of urban & regional research, 2012, 36(1): 71-89.

  [6] NARAYANA M R. Globalization and urban economic growth: evidence for Bangalore, India[J]. International journal of urban & regional research, 2011, 35(6): 1284-1301.

  [7] ZHAO M, LIU X, DERUDDER B, et al. Mapping producer services networks in mainland Chinese cities[J]. Urban studies, 2015, 52(16): 3018-3034.

  [8] PAIN K, HAMME G V, VINCIGUERRA S, et al. Global networks, cities and economic performance: observations from an analysis of cities in Europe and the USA[J]. Urban studies, 2016, 53(6): 1137-1161.

  [9] CHIODELLI F. Religion and the city: a review on Muslim spatiality in Italian cities[J]. Cities, 2015, 44:19-28.

  [10] HARTAL S, MALUL M, RUBIN O D. The role of coordination failure in the movement of future knowledge workers away from the periphery[J]. Cities, 2017, 64: 18-25.

  [11] CHEN C, ZHAO M. The undermining of rural labor out-migration by household strategies in China’s migrant-sending areas: the case of Nanyang, Henan Province[J]. Cities, 2016, 60: 446-453.

  [12] LIU Y, ZHANG F, WU F, et al. The subjective wellbeing of migrants in Guangzhou, China: the impacts of the social and physical environment[J]. Cities, 2017, 60: 333-342.

  [13] GREENE M, MORA R, FIGUEROA C, et al. Towards a sustainable city: applying urban renewal incentives according to the social and urban characteristics of the area[J]. Habitat international, 2017, 68: 15-23.

  [14] TAMMARU T, STR?MGREN M, HAM M V, et al. Relations between residential and workplace segregation among newly arrived immigrant men and women[J]. Cities, 2016, 59: 131-138.

  [15] WU Q, CHENG J, YOUNG C. Social differentiation and spatial mixture in a transitional city-Kunming in southwest China[J]. Habitat international, 2017, 64: 11-21.

  [16] VALEN?A M M. Social rental housing in HK and the UK: neoliberal policy divergence or the market in the making?[J]. Habitat international, 2015, 49: 107-114.

  [17] FAN Y, ALLEN R, SUN T. Spatial mismatch in Beijing, China: implications of job accessibility for Chinese low-wage workers[J]. Habitat international, 2014, 44: 202-210.

  [18] HE S Y. A hierarchical estimation of school quality capitalisation in house prices in Orange County, California[J]. Urban studies, 2017, 54(14): 3337-3359. 

  [19] BENNETT K, COCHRANE A, MOHAN G, et al. Negotiating the educational spaces of urban multiculture: skills, competencies and college life[J]. Urban studies, 2016, 54(10): 2305-2321.

  [20] MACLEOD G. Urban politics reconsidered: growth machine to postdemocratic city?[J]. Urban studies, 2011, 48(12): 2629-2660.

  [21] WU F. China’s emergent city-region governance: a new form of state spatial selectivity through state-orchestrated rescaling[J]. International journal of urban & regional research, 2016. 40(6): 1134-1151.

  [22] SORENSEN A, OKATA J, FUJII S. Urban renaissance as intensification: building regulation and the rescaling of place governance in Tokyo’s highrise manshon boom[J]. Urban studies, 2010, 47(3): 556-583.

  [23] LIN Y, HAO P, GEERTMAN S. A conceptual framework on modes of governance for the regeneration of Chinese ‘villages in the city’[J]. Urban studies, 2015, 52(10): 1774-1790.

  [24] HAO P, GEERTMAN S, HOOIMEIJER P, et al. Spatial analyses of the urban village development process in Shenzhen, China[J]. International journal of urban and regional research, 2013, 37(6): 2177-2197.

  [25] ZHOU S, LIU Y, KWAN M P. Spatial mismatch in post-reform urban China: a case study of a relocated state-owned enterprise in Guangzhou[J]. Habitat international, 2016, 58: 1-11.

  [26] ANDRES L, GOLUBCHIKOV O. The limits to artist-led regeneration: creative brownfields in the cities of high culture[J]. International journal of urban & regional research, 2016, 40(4): 757-775.

  [27] BACQUé M H, BIEWENER C. Different manifestations of the concept of empowerment: the politics of urban renewal in the United States and the United Kingdom[J]. International journal of urban & regional research, 2013, 37(6): 2198-2213.

  [28] LIN J J, CHUNG J C. Metro-induced gentrification: a 17-year experience in Taipei[J]. Cities, 2017, 67: 53-62.

  [29] KOVACS Z, WIESSNER R, ZISCHNER R. Urban renewal in the inner city of budapest: gentrification from a post-socialist perspective[J]. Urban studies, 2013, 50(1): 22-38.

  [30] SYKES B, MUSTERD S. Examining neighbourhood and school effects simultaneously: what does the Dutch evidence show?[J]. Urban studies, 2011, 48(7): 1307-1331.

  [31] WEY W M, HSU J. New urbanism and smart growth: toward achieving a smart “National Taipei University” district[J]. Habitat international, 2014, 42(2): 164-174.

  [32] CSéFALVAY Z. Searching for economic rationale behind gated communities: a public choice approach[J]. Urban studies, 2011, 48(4): 749-764.

  [33] LI J, WANG F, WUZHATI S, et al. Urban or village residents? a case study of the spontaneous space transformation of the forced upstairs farmers’ community in Beijing[J]. Habitat international, 2016, 56: 136-146.

  [34] LANG W, CHEN T, LI X. A new style of urbanization in China: transformation of urban rural communities[J]. Habitat international, 2016, 55(1): 1-9.

  [35] SWAPAN M S H. Who participates and who doesn’t? adapting community participation model for developing countries[J]. Cities, 2016, 53: 70-77.

  [36] JABAREEN Y. Planning the resilient city: concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk[J]. Cities, 2013, 31(2): 220-229.

  [37] VANOLO A. Smartmentality: the smart city as disciplinary strategy[J]. Urban studies, 2014, 51(5): 883-898.

  [38] SHI Q, LIU T, MUSTERD S, et al. How social structure changes in Chinese global cities: synthesizing globalization, migration and institutional factors in Beijing[J]. Cities, 2017, 60: 156-165.

  [39] MEETEREN M V, BASSENS D. World cities and the uneven geographies of financialization: unveiling stratification and hierarchy in the world city archipelago[J]. International journal of urban & regional research, 2016, 40(1): 62-81.

  [40] IWAMA N, ASAKAWA T, TANAKA K, et al. Analysis of the factors that disrupt dietary habits in the elderly: a case study of a Japanese food desert[J]. Urban studies, 2016, 54(15): 3560-3578.