DOI: 10.19830/j.upi.2019.210
The Enlightenment of Zoning Practice in the U.S. Under the National Land and Spatial Planning Framework to Chinese Regulatory Detailed Planning Reform

Han Wenjing, Qiu Zeyuan, Wang Mei, Zhang Zhengfeng, Wan Chengwei, Yang Xi

Keywords: National Land and Spatial Planning; Land Use Controls; Regulatory Detailed Planning; Zoning; Spatial Governance

Abstract:

Urbanization in China has gradually entered a new era of transition toward high-quality development. The regulatory framework of urban land use master planning has shown some serious problems in controlling urban land uses and can no longer meet the demand for more efficiently controlling the uses of precious urban spaces called by the transformation of market economy and the reform in the National Land and Spatial Planning System. This paper starts from the review on the general background and development of zoning, a land use regulatory system in the U.S. and compares the zoning practice in the U.S., specifically in the City of New York, to the practices of the Urban Regulatory Land use Planning system in China in terms of regulatory status, legal effect, regulatory contents and implementation procedure. Looking forward, we present several new ideas for future reform in the Regulatory Detailed Planning, such as comprehensive land use control at a parcel level, diversity of regulations, enhanced legal effects of the existing land use controls, and diversity and flexibility of land use control measures to meet the new requirements of the National Land and Spatial Planning System reform under the new era of transition.


Funds:

Brief Info of Author(s):

References:
  • [1] 石楠. Zoning 区划控制性详规[J]. 城市规划, 1992(2): 53-57.

    [2] 谭永忠, 陈珊. 发达国家国土空间用途管制制度及其对我国的借鉴[J]. 土地科学动态, 2019(2): 45-49.

    [3] 田莉. 我国控制性详细规划的困惑与出路—— 一个新制度经济学的产权分析视角[J]. 城市规划, 2007(1): 16-20.

    [4] 李浩. 控制性详细规划指标调整工作的问题与对策[J]. 城市规划, 2008(2): 45-49.

    [5] 汪坚强, 于立. 我国控制性详细规划研究现状与展望[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2010(3): 87-97.

    [6] 鲍梓婷, 刘雨菡, 周剑云. 市场经济下控制性详细规划制度的适应性调整[J]. 规划师, 2015, 31(4): 27-33.

    [7] FISCHEL W A. Zoning and land use regulation[J]. Encyclopedia of law and economics, 2000(2): 403-423.

    [8] HIRT S A. Zoned in the USA: the origins and implications of American land-use regulation[M]. Cornell University Press, 2015.

    [9] 邵挺. 美国土地使用管制是不是走得太远了?[J]. 中国发展观察, 2015(11): 60-62.

    [10] 章征涛, 宋彦. 美国区划演变经验及对我国控制性详细规划的启示[J]. 城市发展研究, 2014, 21(9): 39-46.

    [11] 侯丽. 美国“新”区划政策的评介[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2005(3): 36-42.

    [12] 田莉. 美国区划的尴尬[J]. 城市规划汇刊, 2004(4): 58-60, 96.

    [13] MAANTAY J. Zoning, equity, and public health[J]. American journal of public health, 2001, 91(7): 1033-1041.

    [14] 李恒. 美国区划发展历史研究[J]. 城市与区域规划研究, 2008(2): 208-223. 

    [15] 李强, 王珊. 纽约的分区制及其启示[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2005(5): 95-97.

    [16] 李强. 县域国土空间管制: 以美国蒙哥马利县区划为例[C] // 持续发展 理性规划——2017 中国城市规划年会论文集(15 控制性详细规划). 中国城市规划学会, 东莞市人民政府, 2017: 32-42.

    [17] 章征涛, 宋彦, 丁国胜, 等. 从新城市主义到形态控制准则——美国城市地块形态控制理念与工具发展及启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2018, 33(4): 42-48. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2017.414.

    [18] 戚冬瑾, 周剑云. 基于形态的条例——美国区划改革新趋势的启示[J]. 城市规划, 2013, 37(9): 67-75.

    [19] 衣霄翔, 朱雪光. 控规调整的“必要性”内涵与方法辨析——以美国“区划变更”为借鉴[J]. 城乡规划, 2018(5): 64-70, 78.

    [20] 韦亚平, 朱敬, 杨深. 作为地方政治过程的美国区划及其技术体系——兼论新时期控制性详细规划的编制创新[J]. 规划师, 2010, 26(10): 113-118.

    [21] 姚之浩, 曾海鹰. 1950 年代以来美国城市更新政策工具的演化与规律特征[J]. 国际城市规划, 2018, 33(4): 18-24. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2017.413.

    [22] 王向东, 刘卫东. 中美土地利用分区管制的比较分析及其启示[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2014(5): 97-103.

    [23] The Department of City Planning, New York City. Zoning maps[EB/OL]. [2020-02-15]. https://www1.nyc.gov/site/planning/zoning/index-map.page.

    [24] 周岚, 叶斌, 徐明尧. 探索面向管理的控制性详细规划制度架构——以南京为例[J]. 城市规划, 2007(3): 14-19, 29.

    [25] 本刊编辑部.“ 空间治理体系下的控制性详细规划改革与创新”学术笔谈会[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2019(3): 1-10.

    [26] 汤黎明, 庞晓媚. 地方城市规划法规的两种模式[J]. 规划师, 2006(2): 63-65.

    [27] 周晓菲. 从“管理”到“治理”一字之差,其内涵有何区别[EB/OL]. (2013-12-04)[2020-02-15]. http://theory.people.com.cn/n/2013/1204/c40531-23738656.html.

    [28] 许景权. 基于空间规划体系构建对我国空间治理变革的认识与思考[J]. 城乡规划, 2018(5): 14-20.


TOP 10