DOI: 10.19830/j.upi.2020.393
International Certification Mechanism of “Child Friendly Cities (Communities)” and Related Practices and Theoretical Developments of European and American Cities

Xu Mengyi, Tim Gill, Mao Pan, Tian Ting

Keywords: Child Friendly Cities Initiative; Certification Mechanisms; European and American Cities“; Hub-and-Spoke” Model; Localization

Abstract:

This paper firstly analyzes the origin, goals and principles, certification mechanisms and the impacts on urban planning of the United Nations Children’s Fund Child Friendly Cities Initiative from the perspective of an international initiative. And this paper investigates and analyzes the themes of urban practice strategies, including main contents, implementation methods and effectiveness in nine European and American cities from 1970s. And then it proposes a new method “Hub-and-Spoke” model. It also analyzes the relationships and differences between the “Hub-and-Spoke” model and the building elements of the Child Friendly Cities Initiatives. Ultimately, it combined with the development status of Chinese Child Friendly Cities (Communities), and proposes the guiding role of the Child Friendly Cities Initiative should be further emphasized. Following the experiences of European and American urban planning practices dialectically, it is helpful to find building elements and standards and promote local sustainable development for Child Friendly Cities (Communities) in China.


Funds:

Brief Info of Author(s):

References:
  • [1] United Nations Children’s Fund. The state of the world’s children 2012: executive summary[R]. New York: UNICEF, 2012.

    [2] 沈瑶, 木下勇, 贺磊. 高层居住小区儿童游戏空间发展特征与更新方向[J]. 人文地理, 2015(3): 28-33.

    [3] 沈瑶, 刘晓艳, 刘赛. 基于儿童友好城市理论的公共空间规划策略——以长沙与岳阳的民意调查与案例研究为例[J]. 城市规划, 2018, 42(11): 79-86, 96.

    [4] 贺丹, 刘厚莲. 中国人口老龄化发展态势、影响及应对策略[J]. 中共中央党校(国家行政学院)学报, 2019(4): 84-90.

    [5] 沈瑶, 朱红飞, 刘梦寒, 等. 少子化、老龄化背景下日本城市收缩时代的规划对策研究[J]. 国际城市规划, 2020, 35(2): 47-53. DOI: 10.19830/j.upi.2020.053.

    [6] United Nations Children’s Fund. What is the Child Friendly Cities Initiative?[EB/OL]. (2018-05-01)[2020-05-31]. https://childfriendlycities.org/what-is-the-child-friendly-cities-initiative/.

    [7] 联合国儿童基金会. 构建儿童友好型城市和社区手册[EB/OL]. (2019-05-01)[2019-11-30]. https://www.unicef. cn/reports/cfci-handbook.

    [8] UNICEF. Child Friendly City and community handbook[EB/OL]. (2018-05-01)[2020-05-31]. https://s25924.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/CFCI-handbook-NewDigital-May-2018.pdf.

    [9] UNICEF. Assessment of Child Friendly City Initiative (CFCI) development in the Republic of Belarus[EB/OL]. (2017-02-01)[2020-05-31]. https://s25924.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Belarus-CFCI-Assessment-Final-Report.pdf.

    [10] UNICEF. The Child-Friendly City Initiative in the Republic of Korea[EB/OL]. (2017-02-01) [2020-05-31]. https://s25924.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CFCI-Case-Study-Korea.pdf.

    [11] UNICEF. The Child-Friendly City Initiative in Finland[EB/OL]. (2017-02-01)[2020-05-31]. https://s25924.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CFCICase-Study-Finland.pdf.

    [12] UNICEF. The Child-Friendly City Initiative in Germany [EB/OL]. (2017-02-01)[2020-05-31]. https://s25924.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CFCI- Case- Study-Germany.pdf.

    [13] UNICEF. Shaping urbanization for children a handbook--on child-responsive urban planning[EB/OL]. (2018-05-01)[2020-05-31]. https://s25924.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2018-08-26-Handbook-Child-responsive-Urban-Planning-on-line.pdf.

    [14] GILL T. Building cities fit for children case studies of child-friendly urban planning and design in Europe and Canada[R]. United Kingdom: London, 2017.

    [15] GILL T. Space-oriented children’s policy: creating child-friendly communities to improve children’s well-being[J]. Children & society, 2008, 22(2): 136-142.

    [16] GILL T. Playing it safe? a global white paper on risk, liability and children’s play in public space[R]. England: London, 2018.

    [17] GILL T. No fear growing up in a risk averse society[M]. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation United Kingdom Branch, 2007: 82.


TOP 10