Tang Yan

Keywords： Urban Regeneration; Institution; Governance Scale; Driving Force; Control Elements

Abstract：

The construction of urban regeneration institution has risen to be a hot topic in China in recent years. On the one hand, it is closely related to the urban “internal” development era brought about by socio-economic transformation; on the other hand, it is inextricably linked to a series of obstacles encountered in the urban regeneration practices. At present, due to the lack of systematic theoretical guidance and effective institutional design, the implementation of urban regeneration in China is facing many challenges and difficulties. Therefore, based on interpretation of the meanings of urban regeneration and its institutions, as well as surrounding the practical progress and weak spots of institutional construction in urban regeneration of China, this paper discusses the key fields and strategies of the institutional construction of urban regeneration from three aspects of “scale-control -elements”, including the establishment of integrated national and local urban regeneration policy system, the implementation of differentiated control measures for urban regeneration projects with various motivations, and the systematically construction of compatible “subject-space-capital” regeneration rules, so as to provide references for promoting institutional reform and improving policies of urban regeneration in China.

Funds：

• [1] 王蒙徽 . 实施城市更新行动 [EB/OL]. (2020-03-14)[2020-11-17]. http:// www.mohurd.gov.cn/jsbfld/202011/t20201117_248050.html. 

  [2] 唐燕 , 杨东 , 祝贺 . 城市更新制度建设 ：广州、深圳、上海的比较 [M]. 北京 : 清华大学出版社 , 2019. 

  [3] 阳建强, 陈月. 1949—2019年中国城市更新的发展与回顾[J]. 城市规划, 2020, 44(2): 9-19, 31. 

  [4] 丁凡 , 伍江 . 城市更新相关概念的演进及在当今的现实意义 [J]. 城市规 划学刊 , 2017(6): 87-95. 

  [5] ROBERTS P W, SYKES H. Urban regeneration: a handbook[M]. London: SAGE, 2000. 

  [6] 方可 . 西方城市更新的发展历程及其启示 [J]. 城市规划汇刊 , 1998(1): 59-61, 51-66. 

  [7] 张庭伟 . 从城市更新理论看理论溯源及范式转移 [J]. 城市规划学刊 , 2020(1): 9-16.

  [8] NORTH D C. Institutions[J]. Journal of economic perspective, 1991(5): 97- 12. 

  [9] TALLON A. Urban regeneration in the UK (2nd version)[M]. London: Routledge, 2013. 

  [10] 杨连强 . 利益差别与政策博弈 ：中央与地方关系的另类解读 [J]. 重庆 社会科学 , 2006(7): 101-105. 

  [11] MUSTERD S, OSTENDORF W. Integrated urban renewal in the Netherlands: a critical appraisal[J]. Urban research and practice, 2008(1): 78-92. 

  [12] HESSE M. On borrowed size, flawed urbanisation and emerging enclave spaces: the exceptional urbanism of Luxembourg, Luxembourg[J]. European urban and regional studies, 2016, 23(4): 612-624. 

  [13] LEARY M E, McCARTHY J. The Routledge companion to urban regeneration[M]. London: Routledge, 2013. 

  [14] 吕斌 . 日本实施城市更新的制度构建与施策体系 [EB/OL]. (2020-03-14) [2021-02-02]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/i0MsDWe1ibyxYDVyEhf8pA. 

  [15] 柯于璋. 社区主义治理模式之理论与实践——兼论台湾地区社区政策[J]. 公共行政学报 , 2005(9): 33-57.