Xi Jiaoru, Wang Jiangbo

Keywords： The Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami; Post-disaster Reconstruction; Planning Practices; “Top-down” Approach of Governmental Enforcement; “Bottom-up” Approach of Community Consensus

Abstract：

The decision making of the China’s post-disaster reconstruction planning featured by a “government-oriented, top-down” hierarchy, which allows for the coordination of resources and concentration of efforts to efficiently advance reconstruction work. But researches proposed that the mechanism is prone to contradiction between a strong “top-down” governmental enforcement and realization of the “bottom-up” community’s decision-making space. This paper chooses Yuriage district in Natori City and Tamauranishi district in Iwanuma City  after the Great East Japan Earthquake as typical cases, representing “the correction after the failure of a ‘top-down’ ideal planning scheme” and “the smooth progress of a planning scheme based on ‘bottom-up’ community consent” respectively. It examines the different planning measurements of acquiring community consent, planning schemes, implementation progress and evaluation, with a view to providing concrete methodological suggestions for balancing government facilitation and community consensus in post-disaster reconstruction planning in China.

Funds：

• [1] 中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会. 关于做好特别重大自然灾害灾后恢复重建工作的指导意见[Z]. 2019.

  [2] COMERIO M C. Disaster recovery and community renewal: housing approaches[J]. Cityscape, 2014, 16(2): 51-68.

  [3] 郗皎如, 铃木萨琪, 王江波. 因灾群体居住安置路径选择模式的国际比较研究[J]. 国际城市规划, 2020, 35(6): 97-105. DOI: 10.19830/j.upi.2019.193.

  [4] XI J, ONODA Y, TSUKUDA H. Various development of counterpart assistance in post-disaster reconstruction, a study on Wenchuan Earthquake, Yushu Earthquake and Lushan Earthquake[J]. Journal of architecture and planning (transactions of aij), 2016, 81(724): 1291-1301.

  [5] LU Y, XU J. The progress of emergency response and rescue in China: a comparative analysis of Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes[J]. Natural hazards, 2014, 74(2): 421-444.

  [6] 公益财团法人兵库震灾纪念21世纪研究机构. 灾害对策全书[M]. 成都: 四川人民出版社, 2013.

  [7] UNISDR: The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015-2030[R]. The third United Nations World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction, Sendai, Japan, 2015.

  [8] 宮城県岩沼市. 東日本大震災岩沼市の記録[R]. 2014.

  [9] 宮城県名取市. 東日本大震災名取市の記録[R]. 2014.

  [10] 国土交通省総合政策局参事官. 津波防灾地域づくり推進計画作成ガイドライン[Z]. 2018.

  [11] 名取市. 名取市震災復興計画[Z]. 2011.

  [12] 津波は対抗せずやり過ごせ 名取市閖上の箱舟構想[N]. 日本経済新聞, 2012-03-03.

  [13] 国立研究開発法人 科学技術振興機構. 閖上地区の再建は誰のため？被災地復興をめぐって住民と名取市に大きな隔たり[R]. 2014.

  [14] 名取市. 名取市震災復興計画（改定版）[Z]. 2017.

  [15] 岩沼市. 岩沼市震災復興計画グランドデザイン[Z]. 2011.

  [16] 前田昌弘, 佃悠, 小野田泰明, 等. 集団移転における世帯分離·再編を伴う住宅·生活再建に関する研究: －東日本大震災における宮城

  県岩沼市玉浦西住地区を事例として－ [J]. 日本建築学会計画系論文集, 2020, 85(770): 793-803.

  [17] 宮城県岩沼市. 玉浦西のあゆみー思いは未来へー[R]. 2015.

  [18] 東北大学建築空学研究室. 岩沼市玉浦西災害公営住宅―デッキと緑道による防災集団移転住宅地との接続[J]. 新建築, 2016(8): 34-35.

  [19] 大畑順平, 坂口大洋. 震災復興におけるまちづくり協議会の役割及び組織体制の変化 －名取市閖上地区を事例として－ [J]. 日本建築学会大会学術講演梗概集（九州）, 2016(8): 1077-1078.

  [20] 岩沼市. 復興公営住宅の整備スケジュール[R]. 2018.

  [21] 水田惠三. 東日本大震災後の復興感に及ぼす要因の研究: 石巻市·岩沼市·名取市[J]. 尚絅総研論集, 2020(2): 89-98.

  [22] JOHNSON L A, HAYASHI H. Synthesis efforts in disaster recovery research[J]. International journal of mass emergencies & disasters, 2012, 30(2): 212-238.

  [23] CARPENTER A. Resilience in the social and physical realms: lessons from the Gulf Coast[J]. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 2015, 14: 290-301.

  [24] TING W, CHEN H. The alternative model of development: the practice of community economy in disaster-stricken Sichuan[J]. China journal of social work, 2012, 5(1): 3-24.

  [25] ABRAMSON D, QI Y.“ Urban-Rural Integration” in the earthquake zone: Sichuan’s post-disaster reconstruction and the expansion of the Chengdu Metropole[J]. Pacific affairs, 2011, 84(3): 495-523.

  [26] OLSHANSKY R B, HOPKINS L D, JOHNSON L A. Disaster and recovery: processes compressed in time[J]. Natural hazards review, 2012, 13(3): 173-178.