Jiang Kaikai, Gao Yichen

Keywords： Sunshine Rights; Daylight Rights; Relationship of Rights and Obligations; Civil Law; Urban Regeneration; Urban Planning

Abstract：

Sunshine rights reflect a very complex spatial relationship and the balance between rights and obligations. However, the relevant legal system lags behind, leading to theoretical and practical confusion. This paper sorts out the legal provisions of sunshine rights, as well as 108 selected judicial cases. And then, the problems in theory and practice are analyzed from the aspects of the relationship between administrative litigation and civil litigation, the relationship between national standards and violation of sunshine rights, as well as compensation standards. Based on the above, it proposes that the root cause of sunshine rights problem is the lack of complete and operable provisions on sunshine rights in the civil law system. Finally, from the perspective of land use, this paper proposes to establish a cooperative rule system of civil laws and urban planning standards. Specific measures include: clarifying the application scope of national sunshine standards, studying the boundary of rights and obligations of sunshine rights in the civil law system, establishing the calculation standard of compensation, and improving sunshine rules based on urban planning.

Funds：

• [1] 郑童, 吕斌, 张纯. 基于模糊评价法的宜居社区评价研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2011(9): 118-124.

  [2] 陈群, 刘晗, 陈周熠. 相邻关系技术标准的应用——以相邻日照采光权纠纷为例[J]. 人民司法, 2015(19): 35-36, 48.

  [3] 刘长兴. 我国相邻权规范的绿色解释——以相邻采光为例[J]. 政治与法律, 2020(10): 108-118.

  [4] 张曼莉. 试论相邻关系中侵害日照权的民事责任[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2010(3): 110-114.

  [5] 付春杨. 司法实践中确认的权利——从清代相邻权的实例考析[J]. 社会科学家, 2008(2): 30-33.

  [6] 刘琦, 王德华. 建筑日照[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2016: 2.

  [7] 梁慧星, 陈华彬. 物权法[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2010: 205.

  [8] 贾茵. 保护规范理论在公法相邻权行政案件中的域外案例与适用指引[J]. 法律适用, 2020(8): 66-79.

  [9] 李超. 采光妨害的判定及其赔偿标准[J]. 人民司法, 2009(11): 108-110.

  [10] 城乡建设环境保护部. 城镇个人建造住宅管理办法[EB/OL]. 福建省住房和城乡建设厅. (1983-06-04)[2021-06-13]. http://zjt.fujian.gov.cn/xxgk/zfxxgkzl/ xxgkml/dfxfgzfgzhgfxwj/zfbzhzfzdgg/198306/t19830604_2638602.htm.

  [11] 顾大松. 法定与意定：规划许可采光纠纷的公私法解决路径[J]. 国际城市规划, 2017(1): 35-39. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2016.495.

  [12] 陈勇, 华晨. 阳光权法律二重性在城乡规划管理中的界定[J]. 城市规划, 2019(10): 86-93, 113.

  [13] 赵晓舒. 采光、日照妨害的民事救济方式[J]. 法律适用, 2013(4): 35-38.

  [14] 王孟永, 王伟强. 射入建筑的采光与日照——1830年代至1930年代光照标准的演进历程与启示[J]. 城市规划, 2014(9): 28-38.

  [15] 张播, 赵文凯. 住宅日照标准的多学科认识[J]. 城市规划 , 2010(12): 83-87.

  [16] 邵晋栋. 采光权妨害案件相关法律问题研究[J]. 河北法学, 2008(1): 186-191.

  [17] 吕一平, 赵民. 简论《民法典》与国土空间规划的关联性[J]. 城市规划, 2020(9): 61-67.

  [18] 于洋. “请别挡住我的阳光”——由一个阳光权纠纷案引发的产权思考[J]. 城市规划, 2016(4): 93-98.

  [19] 梁慧星, 陈华彬. 物权法[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2010: 197-198.

  [20] 韩光明. 财产权利与容忍义务：不动产相邻关系规则分析[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2010: 213.

  [21] 陈建萍, 颜强. 城乡规划管理中“阳光权”法律属性的二重性辨析——兼与周剑云先生商榷[J]. 城市规划, 2008(10): 62-64.

  [22] 陈华彬. 对我国物权立法的若干新思考——兼评2004年10月15日《中华人民共和国物权法（草案）》[J]. 金陵法律评论, 2005(1): 10-22.