DOI: 10.19830/j.upi.2021.399
Comparison and Linkage of Thinking About Cognition and Design of Urban Morphology

Song Yacheng

Keywords: Urban Morphology; Urban Design; Pattern Recognition; Value-oriented; Digital Urban Design

Abstract:

The thinking logic of connecting morphological cognition and design is of fundamental significance for the establishment of scientific knowledge framework. This paper starts with the establishment logic of knowledge system of urban morphology and urban design, then the common characteristics for comparison are summarized. On this basis, from three aspects of pattern recognition, pattern operation, and linkage to reality, the differences of thinking logic between morphological cognition and form design are explained respectively. From the perspective of professional collaboration, time evolution and hierarchy transformation, three kinds of coherent thinking approaches are put forward. These approaches initially establish the linkage combination of urban morphology theory and design practices, also provide a solid and scientific foundation for the communication and interaction between urban design and other disciplines.


Funds:

Brief Info of Author(s):

References:
  • [1] 韩冬青. 设计城市——从形态理解到形态设计[J]. 建筑师, 2013(4): 60-65.

    [2] 丁沃沃. 城市设计:理论?研究? [J]. 城市设计, 2015(1): 68-79.

    [3] MARSHALL S, CALISKAN O. A joint framework for urban morphology and design[J]. Built environment, 2011, 37(4): 409-426.

    [4] MARSHALL S. Science, pseudo-science and urban design[J]. Urban design international, 2012, 17(4): 257-271.

    [5] CONZEN M R G. Alnwick, Northumberland: a study in town-plan analysis[J]. Transactions and papers (Institute of British Geographers), 1960(27): iii-122.

    [6] WHITEHAND J W R. British urban morphology: the Conzenion tradition[J]. Urban morphology, 2001, 5(2): 103-109.

    [7] WHITEHAND J W R, MORTON N J. Fringe belts and the recycling of urban land: an academic concept and planning practice[J]. Environment and planning b: planning and design, 2003, 30(6): 819-839.

    [8] CANIGGIA G, MAFFEI G L. Architectural composition and building typology: interpreting basic building[M]. Alinea editrice, 2001.

    [9] HILLIER B. Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

    [10] HILLIER B, HANSON J. The social logic of space[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.

    [11] TURNER A. From axial to road-centre lines: a new representation for space syntax and a new model of route choice for transport network analysis[J]. Environment and planning b: planning and design, 2007, 34(3): 539-555.

    [12] FIGUEIREDO L, AMORIM L. Continuity lines in the axial system[C]. Delft, the Netherlands: The Fifth Space Syntax International Symposium. Delft University of Technology, 2005.

    [13] JIANG B, CLARAMUNT C. Topological analysis of urban street networks[J]. Environment and planning b: planning and design, 2004, 31(1): 151-162.

    [14] PEPONIS J, BAFNA S, ZHANG Z. The connectivity of streets: reach and directional distance[J]. Environment and planning b: planning and design, 2008, 35(5): 881-901.

    [15] BATTY M. Building a science of cities[J]. Cities, 2012, 29: S9-S16.

    [16] BATTY M. Cities and complexity: understanding cities through cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals[M]. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2005.

    [17] MOUDON A V. Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field[J]. Urban morphology, 1997, 1(1): 3-10.

    [18] GAUTHIER P, GILLILAND J. Mapping urban morphology: a classification scheme for interpreting contributions to the study of urban form[J]. Urban morphology, 2006, 10(1): 41-50.

    [19] KROPF K. Aspects of urban form[J]. Urban morphology, 2009, 13(2): 105-20.

    [20] WHITEHAND J W R, GU K, CONZEN M P, et al. The typological process and the morphological period: a cross-cultural assessment[J]. Environment and planning b: planning and design, 2014, 41(3): 512-533.

    [21] OLIVEIRA V, MONTEIRO C, PARTANEN J. A comparative study of urban form[J]. Urban morphology, 2015, 19(1): 73-92.

    [22] OLIVEIRA V, MEDEIROS V. Morpho: combining morphological measures[J]. Environment and planning b: planning and design, 2016, 43(5): 805-825.

    [23] SCHEER B C. The epistemology of urban morphology[J]. Urban morphology, 2016, 20(1): 5-17.

    [24] HAN D, SONG Y, WANG E, et al. Multiple dimensions of urban design development from a practice perspective: a case study of an institute in Nanjing[J]. Frontiers of architectural research, 2021, 10(1): 79-91.

    [25] 乔纳森·巴内特. 城市设计:现代主义、传统、绿色和系统的观点[M]. 刘晨, 黄彩萍, 译. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2014.

    [26] 王建国. 从理性规划的视角看城市设计发展的四代范型[J]. 城市规划, 2018, 42(1): 9-19, 73.

    [27] 伊恩·伦诺克斯·麦克哈格. 设计结合自然[M]. 黄经纬, 译. 天津: 天津大学出版社, 2006.

    [28] 王建国. 基于人机互动的数字化城市设计——城市设计第四代范型刍议[J]. 国际城市规划, 2018, 33(1): 1-6. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2017.558.

    [29] MARGOLIS H. Patterns, thinking, and cognition: a theory of judgment[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

    [30] KROPF K. Ambiguity in the definition of built form[J]. Urban morphology, 2014, 18(1): 41-57.

    [31] MARSHALL S. Street and pattern[M]. New York: Spon Press, 2005.

    [32] 叶宇, 庄宇. 城市形态学中量化分析方法的涌现[J]. 城市设计, 2016(4): 56-65.

    [33] 龙瀛, 周垠. 街道活力的量化评价及影响因素分析——以成都为例[J]. 新建筑, 2016(1): 52-57.

    [34] 盛强, 杨滔, 刘星. 酒香不怕巷子深?——基于大众点评数据对王府井街区餐饮业分布的空间句法分析[J]. 新建筑, 2018(5): 124-129.

    [35] 叶宇, 戴晓玲. 新技术与新数据条件下的空间感知与设计运用可能[J]. 时代建筑, 2017(5): 6-13.

    [36] 丁沃沃, 胡友培, 窦平平. 城市形态与城市微气候的关联性研究[J]. 建筑学报, 2012(7): 16-21.

    [37] 卡米诺·西特. 城市建设艺术[M]. 仲德崑, 译. 南京: 江苏凤凰科学技术出版社, 2017.

    [38] 戈登·卡伦. 简明城镇景观设计[M]. 王钰, 译. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2008.

    [39] 勒·柯布西耶. 光辉城市[M]. 金秋野, 王又佳, 译. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2011.

    [40] 艾德蒙·N. 培根. 城市设计[M]. 黄富厢, 朱琪, 译. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2003.

    [41] 张庭伟, 田莉. 城市读本[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2013.

    [42] ALEXANDER C. A city is not a tree[J]. Design, 1966(206): 45-55.

    [43] C. 亚历山大, H. 奈斯, A. 安尼诺, 等. 城市设计新理论[M]. 陈治业, 童丽萍, 译. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2019.

    [44] 杨俊宴, 朱骁. 人工智能城市设计在街区尺度的逐级交互式设计模式探索[J]. 国际城市规划, 2021, 36(2): 7-15. DOI: 10.19830/j.upi.2021.046.

    [45] 王建国, 张愚. 基于用地开发强度决策支持系统的大尺度城市空间形态优化控制[J]. 中国科学: 技术科学, 2016, 46(6): 633-642.

    [46] FINK T, KOENIG R. Integrated parametric urban design in Grasshopper/Rhinoceros 3D-demonstrated on a master plan in Vienna[C] // eCAADe 37/SIGraDi 23. Porto, Portugal, 2019: 313-322.

    [47] BARNETT J. Urban design as public policy: practical methods for improving cities[M]. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Publication, 1974.

    [48] 吴志强, 甘惟, 臧伟, 等. 城市智能模型(CIM)的概念及发展[J]. 城市规划, 2021, 45(4): 106-113, 118.

    [49] 杨俊宴. 凝核破界——城乡规划学科核心理论的自觉性反思[J]. 城市规划, 2018, 42(6): 36-46.


TOP 10