DOI: 10.19830/j.upi.2022.725
Financing Urban Development Through Land Value Capture Tools

Liu Wei, Liu Shenmin

Keywords: Land Value Capture; Municipal Finance; Infrastructure Finance; Land Policy; Urban Planning; Property Tax

Abstract:

Rapid urbanization creates an enormous pressure on urban public infrastructure. On the one hand, cities need to invest heavily in new infrastructure; on the other hand, existing infrastructure needs to be maintained and renovated. Financing urban infrastructure in a sustainable manner is a major challenge for city governments around the world, and land value capture has proven to be an important financing tool. Implemented in coordination with laws, urban planning, and fiscal tools, land value capture enables urban governments and communities to capture the portion of land value increase that is caused by public investment and other government actions. The additional revenue can then be reinvested in the community, forming a virtuous circle between land value and public expenditure, thereby making municipal finance more sustainable. In this paper, we first review key concepts and literatures around land value capture. Then we categorize and analyze various land value capture tools around the world. Finally, we suggest ways in which China could adapt land value capture to its urban development context.


Funds:

Brief Info of Author(s):

References:
  • [1] DEEP A. Infrastructure finance[C] // GóMEZ-IBá?EZ J, LIU Z, eds. Infrastructure economics and policy: international perstectives. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2022: 197-212.

    [2] INGRAM G K, HONG Y H. Land value capture: types and outcomes[C] //INGRAM G K, HONG Y H, eds. Value capture and land policies. MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2010: 3-18.

    [3] 朱道林. 土地增值收益分配悖论: 理论、实践与改革[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017: 23-26.

    [4] 约翰·斯图亚特·穆勒. 政治经济学原理[M]. 金镝, 金熠, 译. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2017: 758-759.

    [5] 亨利·乔治. 进步与贫困[M]. 吴良健, 王翼龙, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2010: 208-219.

    [6] 周诚. 农地转非自然增值分配需私公兼顾[J]. 农村经营管理, 2010(10): 28.

    [7] BOOTH P A. The unearned increment: property and the capture of betterment value in Britain and France[C] // INGRAM G K, HONG Y H, eds. Value capture and land policies. MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2012: 74-93.

    [8] SMOLKA M. Implementing value capture in Latin America: policies and tools for urban development[R]. Policy Focus Report, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2012: 52.

    [9] SMOLKA M. Implementing value capture in Latin America: policies and tools for urban development[R]. Policy Focus Report, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2012: 53.

    [10] SANDRONI P. A new financial instrument of value capture in S?o Paulo: certificates of additional construction potential[C] // INGRAM G K, HONG Y H, eds. Municipal revenues and land policies. MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2012: 218-236.

    [11] 巴西圣保罗市官网[EB/OL].[2022-07-28]. www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br.[12] JULIE K. CePACs and their value capture viability in the U.S. for infrastructure funding[C]. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2018: 42

    [13] 香港铁路有限公司官网. 业务概览[EB/OL].[2022-07-28]. https: //www.mtr.com.hk/archive/corporate/ch/publications/images/business_overview_c.pdf.

    [14] 杨家文, 段阳, 乐晓辉. TOD 战略下的综合开发土地整备实践——以上海、深圳和东莞为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2020, 35(4): 124-130. DOI: 10.19830/j.upi.2018.190.

    [15] 许雅芝. 区段征收与市地重划怎么办?台北市政府地政局[EB/OL].[2022-07-28]. https: //land.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=1B5D693 DA346D752&ccms_cs=1.

    [16] 黄道远, 刘健, 谭纵波, 等. 台湾地区的土地整理模式及其对大陆农村地区的启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2017, 32(3): 93-99. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2015.304.

    [17] GERMáN L, BERNSTEIN A E. Land value return: tools to finance our urban future[R]. Policy Brief, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2018: 2.

    [18] MERRIMAN D. Improving tax increment financing (TIF) for economic development[R]. Policy Focus Report, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2018: 7.


TOP 10