点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:1822
2015年第6期   DOI:
荷兰兰斯塔德“绿心战略”60 年发展中的争论与共识 —— 兼论对当代中国的启示
Controversies and Consensus of “Green Heart Strategy” in Randstad Holland During 60 Years of Development and Their Inspirations for Contemporary China

袁琳

Yuan Lin

关键词:兰斯塔德;绿心战略;争论;共识;农业地区;城镇化

Keywords:Randstad Holland; Green Heart Strategy; Controversy; Consensus; Rural Area; Urbanization

摘要:

荷兰兰斯塔德地区因多中心的城市环与大面积“绿心”开放空间并存的地区形态闻名于世,但“绿心战略”近60 年的实施过程并非一蹴而就,长期以来一直存有对该战略的怀疑与争论。第一次较为集中的讨论时期是20世纪60、70 年代,这一时期刚刚明确“绿心大都市”的概念,而战后经济复苏带来的绿心内部自发的快速发展也为“绿心”能否成立提出了挑战。另一次更为瞩目的争论发生在20 世纪90 年代中期。1995 年,国家空间规划部专门组织了一次关于绿心战略的大讨论以明确未来的发展方向,争论的过程既有批评与抵制,也有赞同与支持,各种论点的阐释充分显示了人们对于在大都市地区大面积保护农业地区的理想与矛盾。本文试图深入认识与这一战略发展相关的争论与共识,并把握这一开放地带保护与管理的新趋势,以期对当代中国城镇化发展与农业地区保护实践有所启示。


Abstract:

Randstad Holland is well-known for its regional form that polycentric metropolis ring and big green heart coexist with each other. However, 60 years of the implementation of Green Heart strategy is not an accomplishment in one action. There have been lots of controversies over a long time which brought about extensive debates about its persistence or discard. There are two main controversies. One happened in 60-70s, when the concept of Green Heart Metropolitan was just been putted forward, the economic recovery after the World War II stimulated the rapid growth of the built land within the Green Heart, which confused the people about the strategy’s effectiveness; the other happened in mid-1990s, when the Ministry of Space Planning conducted a broad controversy about the Green Heart strategy’s survival, during which there are critics and resistance, and approval and support as well, sufficiently affecting the ideal and paradox of the conservation of agriculture area in metropolitan region. This paper tries to better understand the controversies and consensus of Green Heart strategy, and better grasp the new trends ofprotection and management in green heart, so as to provide some insights for the urbanization and rural area protection in contemporary China.


版权信息:
基金项目:中国博士后基金第55 批面上项目(2014M550738),教育部人文社会科学研究 规划基金/ 青年基金/ 自筹经费项目(15yjczh215)
作者简介:

袁琳,博士,香港大学建筑学院,研究员;清华大学建筑学院,博士后。

yuanlin2013@tsinghua.edu.cn


译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] Peter Hall, Kathy Pain. The Polycentric Metropolis: Learning from Megacity

    Regions in Europe[M]. London, Sterling, VA: Earthscan, 2006: 138.

    [2] Andreas Faludi, Arnold van der Valk, Han L?rzing. The green heart debate[J].

    Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 1996, 87(5): 448-457.

    [3] Four Metropolises in Western Europe: Development and Urban Planning

    of London, Paris, Randstad Holland and the Ruhr Region[M]. Van der

    Cammen, Hans, ed. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1988: 152.

    [4] Arnold van der Valk, Andreas Faludi. The Green Heart and the Dynamics

    of Doctrine[J]. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,

    1997, 12(1): 57-75.

    [5] GerardJL.Vos. Future Forms of Urbanization: An Application for Tigris XL

    on Spatial Policies in the Netherlands (Final-version Final Report)[R]. 2007.

    [6] Remco van Dijk. Green Belts Revisited[R]. Delft: Delft University of

    Technology Faculty of Architecture Department of Urbanism Complex

    Cities Graduation Studio, 2012.

    [7] Michel Van Eeten, Emery Roe. When Fiction Conveys Truth and Authority[J].

    Journal of the American Planning Association, 2000, 66(1): 58-67.

    [8] Barrie Needham, Andreas Faludi. Dutch Growth Management in a

    Changing Market[J]. Planning Practice & Research, 1999, 14(4): 481-491.

    [9] Lambregts, B. Polycentrism: Boon or Barrier to Metropolitan

    Competitiveness? The Case of the Randstad Holland[J]. Built Environment,

    2006, 32(2): 114-123.

    [10] Han Meyer, Inge Bobbink, Steffen Nijhuis, ed. Delta Urbanism: the

    Netherlands[M]. Chicago, IL:American Planning Association, 2010: 101-102.

    [11] Manfred Kühn. Greenbelt and Green Heart: Separating and Integrating

    Landscapes in European City Regions[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,

    2003, 64: 19–27.

    [12] Ernst Storm. Managing Randstad Holland[C]. 40th ISoCaRP Congress, 2004.

    [13] Frans M. Dieleman, Sako Musterd. The Randstad: A Research and Policy

    Laboratory[M]. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 241.

    [14] Eric Koomen, Jasper Dekkers, Terry van Dijk. Open-space Preservation

    in the Netherlands: Planning, Practice and Prospects[J]. Land Use Policy,

    2008, 25: 361-377.

    [15] Leendertse W L, Burger H. Travelling at 300 km/hour Under the “Green

    Heart” of Holland-A Tunnelling Challenge[J]. Tunnelling and Underground

    Space Technology, 1999, 14(2): 211-216.

    [16] Frank van der Hoeven. A Review of the Impact of the RingRing Study

    for Multifunctional Motorway Tunnels in the Netherlands and Beyond[J].

    Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2011, 26: 292-309.

    [17] Sybrand P. Tjallingii. Ecology on the Edge: Landscape and Ecology

    Between Town and Country[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2000, 48:

    103-119.

    [18] Lambregts B W. The Polycentric Metropolis Unpacked: Concepts, Trends

    and Policy in the Randstad Holland[M]. Faculty of Social and Behavioural

    Sciences, 2009: 65.

    [19] Marjan C Hidding, André T J Teunissen. Beyond Fragmentation: New

    Concepts for Urban-rural Development[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,

    2002, 58: 297-308.

    [20] Dirk Frieling. From Randstad to Deltametropolis[M] // Stephen Read,

    Jürgen Rosemann, Job van Eldijk, ed. Future City. London, New York:

    Spon Press, 2005: 31.

    [21] Arnold van der Valk. The Dutch planning experience[J]. Landscape and

    Urban Planning, 2002, 58: 201-210.

    [22] Newton Harrison, Helen Mayer Harrison. Green Heart Vison[M]. 1997.


《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

7742479