点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:257
2017年第1期   DOI:10.22217/upi.2016.495
法定与意定:规划许可采光纠纷的公私法解决路径
By-Law and By-Contract: The Solutions of Public Law and Private Law to Lighting Right Dispute Caused by Planning Permits

顾大松

Gu Dasong

关键词:规划许可;采光权;公法;私法;法定;意定

Keywords:Planning Permit; Lighting Right Dispute; Public Law; Private Law; By-law; By-contract

摘要:

规划许可采光权纠纷是城市规划领域最为常见的法律纠纷类型之一,它既是公法问题,也是私法问题。目前在采光权纠纷的解决方式上,公法和私法却存在着诸多冲突。应遵循“法定”与“意定”的公私法不同逻辑,公平处理相关纠纷:明确相邻权人作为规划许可程序参与主体地位,为其协商补偿预留空间;通过地方立法明确某些情形下,旧城区新建建筑业主对日照受损相邻权人的补偿义务。

Abstract:

Lighting right dispute caused by planning permits is the most frequent legal dispute in urban planning. However, there are some conflicts between public and private laws in terms of the solutions to such dispute. This paper brings forward the different logics of solving lighting right dispute from the perspectives of public law and private law, which are by-law and by-contract: be clear that neighboring right persons should be the main body status involved in the planning permits procedure, in order to reserve space on negotiating compensation for them. In some situations that be clear through local legislation, the new buildings owners in old town should undertake the compensation obligations for lighting right loss of neighboring right persons.

版权信息:
基金项目:
作者简介:

顾大松,博士,东南大学法学院副教授。gudasong@seu.edu.cn

译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] 金启洲. 德国公法相邻关系制度初论[J]. 环球法律评论, 2006(1): 70-79.
    [2] 最高人民法院物权法研究小组,编著.《中华人民共和国物权法》条文理解与适用[M]. 人民法院出版社, 2007: 283.
    [3] 张翔. 财产权的社会义务[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012(9): 100-119.

《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

2627081