于洋

Yu Yang

关键词：司法救济；第三方诉权；城市公共利益；澳大利亚经验；困境与消解

Keywords：Judicial Remedy; Third-party Rights of Appeal; Urban Public Interests; Australian Experience;Dilemma and Solution

摘要：

司法救济是权利救济的终局方式，对于权利保护至关重要。本文从第三方诉权的视角，探讨我国现行城乡规划司法救济制度在保护城市公共利益方面的现实困境。澳大利亚作为全世界最早建立城乡规划司法救济制度并引入第三方诉权的国家，其经验对我国法治化破局具有重要的参考意义。笔者对其中具有代表性的新南威尔士州土地与环境法庭和维多利亚州规划与环境特别法庭进行了个案剖析。在域外经验的基础上，笔者在文章结尾提出若干完善我国第三方权利司法救济的制度性建议。

Abstract：

As the ultimate remedy of rights, judicial remedy is of great importance to the protection of rights. From the perspective of third-party rights of appeal, the paper first discusses the existing dilemma of Chinese judicial remedy in protection of urban public interests. As the earliest nation of establishing urban planning judicial remedy system and introducing third-party rights of appeal, Australian experience has significant inspiration for China. Thus, the paper further researches NSW’s LEC and Victoria’s VCAT in detail. Based on the case studies, some suggestions of solving the institutional dilemma in China are finally brought forward.

于洋，中国人民大学公共管理学院城市规划与管理系，助理教授，硕士生导师。yuyang319@ruc.edu.cn

• [1] Taylor A. English History, 1914-1945[M]. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1965.
  [2] 姜明安. 行政法与行政诉讼法[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2015.
  [3] Wade H. Administrative Law[M]. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1989.
  [4] 何明俊. 空间宪政中的城市规划[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2013.
  [5] 李进之，等. 美国财产法[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 1999.
  [6] 宋雅芳，等. 行政规划的法治化：理念与制度[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2009.
  [7] Davidoff P. Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning[J]. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1965, 31(4): 331-338.
  [8] Arnstein S. A Ladder of Citizen Participation[J]. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969, 35(4): 216-224.
  [9] Forester J. Planning in the Face of Power[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1982, 48(1): 67-80.
  [10] Innes J. Planning Through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1996, 62(4): 460-472.
  [11] Healey P. Planning Through Debate: The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory[M] // Campbell S, Fainstein S. Reading in Planning Theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1997.
  [12] Juergensmeyer J C, Roberts T E. Land Use Planning and Development Regulation Law[M]. New York: Thomson-West, 2003.
  [13] Callies D L. Kelo V. City of New London: Of Planning, Federalism, and a Switch in Time[J]. University of Hawaii Law Review, 2005, 28: 327-348.
  [14] Blaesser B W. Discretionary Land Use Controls: Avoiding Invitations to Abuse of Discretion[M]. Boston, MA: Thomson-West, 2007.
  [15] Willey S. Planning Appeal Processes: Reflections on a Comparative Study[J]. Environment & Planning A, 2007, 39(7): 1676-1698.
  [16] Mualam N. Where Planning Meets the Law: The Rise of Appeal Tribunals for Deciding Land-use Disputes[J]. Journal of Planning Literature, 2014, 29(4): 370-385.
  [17] 邹兵, 范军, 张永宾, 等. 从咨询公众到共同决策——深圳市城市总体规划全过程公众参与的实践与启示[J]. 城市规划, 2011, 35(8): 91-96.
  [18] 莫文竞, 夏南凯. 基于参与主体成熟度的城市规划公众参与方式选择[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2012(4): 79-85.
  [19] 吴祖泉. 解析第三方在城市规划公众参与的作用——以广州市恩宁路事件为例[J]. 城市规划, 2014, 38(2): 62-68.
  [20] 陈新民. 德国公法学基础理论（上卷）[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2010.
  [21] 刘飞. 城市规划行政法[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2007.
  [22] 郑春燕. 论城乡规划的司法审查路径：以涉及城乡规划案件的司法裁判书为例[J]. 中外法学, 2013, 25(4): 803-816.
  [23] 章剑生. 现代行政法基本理论[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2014.
  [24] 杨建顺. 《行政诉讼法》的修改与行政公益诉讼[J]. 法律适用, 2012(11): 60-68.
  [25] 周黎安. 中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J]. 经济研究, 2007(7): 36-50.
  [26] Molotch H. The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1976, 82(2): 309-332.
  [27] 何海波. 困顿的行政诉讼[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2012(2): 86-96.
  [28] 张萍, 杨祖婵. 近十年来我国环境群体性事件的特征简析[J]. 中国地质大学学报 (社会科学版), 2015, 15(2): 53-61.
  [29] Trenorden J C. Third-party Appeal Rights: Past and Future[C]. Perth, Australia: 2009.
  [30] Willey S. Are Planning Appeal Rights Necessary? A Comparative Study of Australia, England and Vancouver BC[J]. Progress in Planning, 2005, 63: 265-320.
  [31] Pearlman M L. The Land and Environment Court of New South Wales a Model for Environmental Protection[J]. Water Air & Soil Pollution, 2000, 123(1-4): 395-407.
  [32] Preston B. Operating an Environment Court: The Experience of the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales[J]. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 2008, 25: 385-409.
  [33] Eccles D. The Impact of Victoria’s New Planning Schemes on Third Party Rights[J]. Urban Policy & Research, 1999, 17(3): 235-243.
  [34] Stein L. Specialist Environmental Court: An Australian Experience[M] // Robinson D, Dunkley J. Public Interest Perspectives in Environmental Law. Wiley Chancery, 1995: 255.
  [35] Willey S. The Merits of Merit-based Planning Appeals: Observations from Australia[J]. International Planning Studies, 2004, 9(4): 261-281.
  [36] De Tocqueville A. Democracy in America[M]. London: Oxford University Press, 1835.
  [37] Stein L. Planning and Accountability[J]. Australian Planner, 1995, 32(2): 71-73.
  [38] 徐平, 朱志炜, 杨朝霞. 论我国环境法庭的困境与出路[J]. 吉首大学学报 (社会科学版), 2014, 35(4): 41-50.
  [39] 高原. 77个环保法庭的尴尬[J]. 政府法制, 2012(21): 14-15.
  [40] 高国辉, 王泉. 77个环保法庭“门庭冷落”[N]. 南方日报, 2012年6月8日(A18版).

• 收起