点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:2350
2017年第2期   DOI:10.22217/UPI.2014.109
形态类型学理论以及本土化的探明
The Theory and Localization About Typo-morphological Approach

陈锦棠 姚圣 田银生

Chen Jintang, Yao Sheng, Tian Yinsheng

关键词:城市形态学;建筑类型学;形态类型学;城市规划

Keywords:Urban Morphology; Architectural Typology; Typo-morphology; Urban Planning

摘要:

康泽恩城市形态学和卡尼吉亚建筑类型学都是西方认知城市形态构成与演进的重要理论。以德国形态生成研究传统为基础的形态学研究方法带有浓厚的历史性特征,而以意大利设计类型学为基础的类型学研究则深刻揭示了各种建成空间之间的类型关系。两者能通过融合各自的优势,形成应用性更高的形态类型学。本文总结近几十年西方学者对形态类型学理论及应用的探讨,形成了该理论的研究框架,并且探明该理论的本土化过程中,我国的理论优势、案例研究时面对的挑战以及在城市规划中的一些应用层面。


Abstract:

Conzenian approach and Caniggian approach are important western methodologies for appreciating the structure and transformation of urban form. Historical thinking is an important framework for Conzenian approach based on the Germany morphorogenetic research tradition. Highlight the relation between every type of built spaces is main component for Caniggian approach developed from Italian design typology. Typo-morphological approach combined the advantages of the two approaches shows higher potential both in understanding and managing the urban form. After a review of the development of the typo-morphology approach from western academic, the research framework is formed. Based on those discussions, attention will be placed on advantages in theory base, challenges in case studies and issues in urban planning during the localization process.


版权信息:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51678241)和亚热带建筑科学国家重点 实验室自主创新课题(2017KB08)资助项目
作者简介:

陈锦棠,华南理工大学建筑学院、英国伯明翰大学联合培养博士研究生,英国伯明翰大学城市形态研究中心研究员。j-t.chen@hotmail.com

姚圣,博士,英国伯明翰大学城市形态研究中心研究员,华南理工大学建筑学院讲师

田银生(通信作者),博士生导师,华南理工大学建筑学院、亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室教授


译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] Moudon A V. Getting to Know the Built Landscape: Typomorphology[A] //

    Franck K A, Schneekloth L H. Ordering Space:Types in Architecture and

    Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1994: 289-311.

    [2] Samuels I. A Typomorphological Approach to Design: The Plan for St

    Gervais[J]. Urban Design International, 1999, 4(3-4): 129-141.

    [3] Kropf K S. An Alternative Approach to Zoning in France: Typology,

    Historical Character and Development Control[J]. European Planning

    Studies, 1996(4): 717-737.

    [4] 谷凯. 城市形态的理论与方法——探索全面与理性的研究框架[J]. 城

    市规划, 2001(12): 36-42.

    [5] 陈飞. 一个新的研究框架: 城市形态类型学在中国的应用[J]. 建筑学报,

    2010(4): 85-90.

    [6] Chen F & Romice O. Preserving the Cultural Identity of Chinese Cities in

    Urban Design Through a Typomorphological Approach[J]. Urban Design

    International, 2009, 14(1): 36-54.

    [7] Moudon A V. The Research Component of Typomorphological Studies[C].

    Boston: AIA/ACSA Reseach Conference, 1987, 11.

    [8] Moudon A V. Urban Morphology as an Emerging Interdisciplinary Field[J].

    Urban Morphology, 1997, 1(1): 3-10.

    [9] Schlüter O. Uber den Grundriss der St.dte[J]. Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft

    Für Erdkunde zu Berlin, 1899, 34: 446-462.

    [10] Geisler W. Danzig: ein siedlungegeographischer Versuch[M]. Danzig:

    Kafemann, 1918.

    [11] Conzen M R G. The Plan Analysis of an English City Centre[M] // Norborg

    K. Proceedings of the I.G.U. Symposium on Urban Geography, Lund, 1960.

    Lund Studies in Geography B, 1962, 24: 383-414.

    [12] Conzen M R G. Morphogenesis, Morphological Regions and Secular

    Human Agency in the Historic townscape, as Exemplified by Ludlow //

    Denecke D, Shaw G. Urban Historical Geography. Cambridge: Cambridge

    University Press, 1988.

    [13] Conzen M R G. Alnwick, Northumberland: A Study in Town-plan

    Analysis[M]. Institute of British Geographers, 1969.

    [14] Muratori S. Studi per una operante storia urbana di Venezia[M] // I:

    Quadro generale dalle origini agli sviluppi attuali, Palladio, 3-4. 1959. 2nd

    Ed. Roma: Istituto Poligrafico dello Stato, 1960.

    [15] Muratori S, Bollati R, Bollati S, Marinucci G. Studi per una operante storia

    urbana di Roma[M]. Roma: Centro Studi di Storia Urbanistica, 1963.

    [16] Caniggia G, Maffei G L. Architectural Composition and Building Typology:

    Interpreting Basic Building[M]. Alinea Editrice, 2001.

    [17] Canigia G. Dialettica tra tipo e tessuto[A]. Paper Given at the Academie de

    France, Rome, 1979.

    [18] Moudon A V. The Role of Typomorphological Studies in Environmental

    Design Research[M] // Changing Paradigms: EDRA 20: proceedings of

    Annual Conference. 1989: 41-48.

    [19] Moudon A V. A Catholic Approach to Organizing What Urban Designers

    Should Know[J]. Journal of Planning Literature, 1992, 6(4): 331-349.

    [20] Levy A. The Typo-morphological Approach of G. Caniggia and His School

    of Thought[J]. Urban Morphology, 1997(1): 52-56.

    [21] Kropf K S. Typological Zoning[M]. Attilio Petruccioli, ed. Typological

    Process and Design Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Aga Khan Program

    for Islamic Architecture. 1998: 127-140.

    [22] Chen F. Typomorphology and the Crisis of Chinese Cities[J]. Urban

    Morphology, 2008, 2(2): 45-47.

    [23] Samuels I. Typomorphology and Urban Design Practice[J]. Urban

    Morphology, 2008, 12(1): 58-61.

    [24] Chen F. The Role of Typomorphology in Sustaining the Cultural Identity

    of Chinese Cities: The Case Study of Nanjing, China[D]. University of

    Strathclyde, 2009.

    [25] Chen F. Typomorphology and Public Participation in China[J]. Urban

    Morphology, 2010, 14(2): 59-62.

    [26] Chen F, Thwaites K. Chinese Urban Design: The Typomorphological

    Approach[M]. Surrey: Ashgate, 2013.

    [27] Tian Y, Gu K, Tao W. Urban Morphology, Architectural Typology and Cities

    in Transition[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2014.

    [28] Maretto M. Ecocities. Ⅱ progetto urbano tra morfologia e sostenibilità[M].

    Rome: Franco Angeli, 2012.

    [29] Marat-Mendes T. Sustainability and the Study of Urban Form[J]. Urban

    Morphology, 2013, 17(02): 123-124.

    [30] 熊国平. 当代中国城市形态演变[M]. 中国建筑工业出版社, 2006.

    [31] Whitehand J W R, Gu K. Research on Chinese Urban Form: Retrospect

    and Prospect[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2006, 30(3): 337-355.

    [32] 段进, 邱国潮. 国外城市形态学概论[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社,

    2009.

    [33] Conzen M R G. 城镇平面格局分析:诺森伯兰郡安尼克案例研究[M].

    宋峰, 等, 译. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2011.

    [34] 沈克宁. 意大利建筑师阿尔多·罗西[J]. 世界建筑, 1988 (6): 50-57.

    [35] 沈克宁. 建筑类型学与城市形态学[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社,

    2010.

    [36] Conzen M P, Gu K, Whitehand J W R. Comparing Traditional Urban Form

    in China and Europe: A Fringe-belt Approach[J]. Urban Geography, 2012,

    3(1): 22-45.

    [37] Whitehand J W R, Gu K, Conzen M P, Whitehand S M. The Typological

    Process and the Morphological Period: A Cross-cultural Assessment[J].

    Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2014, 41(3): 512-533.

    [38] 田银生, 谷凯, 陶伟. 城市形态研究与城市历史保护规划[J]. 城市规划,

    2010, 34(4): 21-26.


《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

7747297