点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:2168
2017年第3期   DOI:10.22217/upi.2017.125
回归后香港公共住房政策审视及实施成效 —— 基于社会可持续性的视角
Examination and Implementation of Public Housing Policies in Post-handover Hong Kong: A Social Sustainability Perspective

魏宗财 何深静 刘玉亭 陈婷婷

Wei Zongcai, He Shenjing, Liu Yuting, Chen Tingting

关键词:公共住房政策;社会可持续性;香港;将军澳

Keywords:Public Housing Policies; Social Sustainability; Hong Kong; Tseung Kwan O

摘要:

香港在解决低收入群体住房问题方面是一个成功的典范。但回归20 年来,香港公共住房的供给除了受复杂多变的宏观经济环境和泛政治化的社会环境的影响,还受社会阶层固化、政策覆盖面有限、政府部门间协调不畅等深层次因素的显著影响,供求脱节的问题难以在短时间内解决。对将军澳新市镇的调查发现,香港已建成的公屋住区具有较高水平的社会可持续性,显示出香港公共住房政策的实施成效显著。这对中国内地及亚洲其他城市在公共住房政策制定和实施方面具有一定的借鉴。笔者建议国内保障性住房政策需要循序渐进地推进,数量与质量并重,更加重视低收入家庭的实际需求。


Abstract:

Hong Kong is a successful model in addressing the housing problem of lowincome groups. However, in the past two decades, the supply of public housing in Hong Kong has been affected by several complex factors, including the complicated global economic environment and the politicized social environment, the consolidated social hierarchical system, the limited coverage of public housing policy, and the poor coordination among government departments. As a result, the imbalance between supply and demand cannot be easily solved. Taking the housing estates in Tseung Kwan O new town as cases, this study found that the public housing estates in Hong Kong enjoy a high level of social sustainability, especially in terms of public transport, employment and community management. This provides important policy implications for the provision of public housing in mainland China and other Asian cities. This study also suggests that the government of mainland China should construct the affordable housing step by step, and pay more attention to the actual needs of lowincome families than before.


版权信息:
基金项目:中国博士后科学基金(2017M610524)、中央高校基本科研业务费(17lgy39) 国家自然科学基金项目(41671153、41271183)、亚热带建筑科学国家重点实 验室自主研究课题项目(2017KA02)共同资助
作者简介:

魏宗财,博士,华南理工大学建筑学院城市规划系博士后,城市规划工程师,国家注册规划师

何深静(通信作者),博士,香港大学建筑学院城市规划及设计系副教授,博士生导师。sjhe@hku.hk

刘玉亭,博士,华南理工大学建筑学院城市规划系、亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室教授,博士生导师

陈婷婷,博士,中山大学地理科学与规划学院城市与区域规划系,副研究员;香港理工大学建筑与房地产系,高级研究助理


译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] Wei Zongcai. Planning and Livability of Subsidized Housing Estates in China: A Case Study of Guangzhou[D]. PhD Thesis. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong, 2017.

    [2] Yeung Y M, Wong K Y, eds. Fifty Years of Public Housing in Hong Kong: A Golden Jubilee Review and Appraisal[M]. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 2003.

    [3] Chiu R L. Planning, Land and Affordable Housing in Hong Kong[J]. Housing Studies, 2007, 22(1): 63-81.

    [4] Chiu R L. The Transferability of Hong Kong’s Public Housing Policy[J]. European Journal of Housing Policy, 2010, 10(3): 301-323.

    [5] 魏宗财, 陈婷婷, 孟兆敏, 等. 广州保障性住房的困境与出路——与香港的比较研究[J]. 国际城市规划, 2015, 30(4): 109-115.

    [6] 杨靖, 郭菂, 张嵩. 香港公屋规划设计的分析与启发[J]. 规划师, 2008, 24(4): 31-35.

    [7] Li S M. Land and Housing Policies in Post-Handover Hong Kong: Political Economy and Urban Space[R]. Public Policy Research Funding Scheme Final Report, 2015.

    [8] Li S M. Housing and Urban Development in Hong Kong: Political Economy and Space[R] // Jim C Y, Li S M, Fung T, eds. A New Geography of Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, HKSAR Government, 2010: 37-70.

    [9] 李思名, 杜慧敏, 陆惠贤. 特别行政区成立后香港的土地与住房政策[J]. 紫荆论坛, 2014,14: 68-74.

    [10] Yung Betty. Hong Kong’s Housing Policy: A Case Study in Social Justice[M]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2008.

    [11] 邹祟铭. 不是土地供应,香港土地问题的迷思与真象[M]. 香港: 基道出版社, 2013.

    [12] 香港房屋委员会. 建屋为民,香港房屋委员会2014/15 年度报告[R]. 2015.

    [13] 中国新闻网.香港10年内房屋供应增至48万个单位[EB/OL]. (2017-01-20)[2014-12-16]. http:// www.chinanews.com/ga/2014/12-16/6882850.shtml.

    [14] 财政司司长办公室经济分析及方便营商处经济分析部及政府统计处. 2012 年香港贫穷情况报告[R]. 香港, 2013.

    [15] 刘国裕. 从公屋居屋的供应目标看合资格申请人的前景[J]. 紫荆论坛, 2015, 20:42-51

    [16] 冯淑环, 甘铭添. 政策局乱斗 管治乱龙建屋大落后[EB/OL]. (2017-02-01)[2016-12-8]. http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20161208/00174_001.html.

    [17] 香港文汇报. 梁振英:设立专门政策机构解决香港“住屋难”[EB/OL]. (2017-01-20) [2012-05-07]. http://www.chinanews.com/ga/2012/05-07/3869098.shtml.

    [18] Bramley G, Power S. Urban Form and Social Sustainability: The Role of Density and Housing Type[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 2009, 36(1): 30-48.

    [19] Colantonio A. Urban Social Sustainability Themes and Assessment Methods[J]. Proceedings of the ICE-Urban Design and Planning 2010, 2010, 163(2): 79-88.

    [20] Dempsey N, Bramley G, Power S, et al. The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability[J]. Sustainable Development, 2011, 19(5): 289-300.

    [21] McKenzie S. Social Sustainability: Towards Some Definitions[R]. Australia: University of South Australia, 2004.

    [22] Wei Z, Wang B, Chen T, et al. Community Development in Urban Guangzhou Since 1980: A Social Sustainability Perspective[J]. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 2016, 4(4): 58-68.

    [23] Congreve A. Sustainable Communities[M] // International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home. San Diego: Elsevier, 2012: 97-110.

    [24] Chan E, Lee G K. Critical Factors for Improving Social Sustainability of Urban Renewal Projects[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2008, 85(2): 243-256.

    [25] Pareja-Eastaway M. Social Sustainability[M] // International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home. San Diego: Elsevier, 2012: 502-505.

    [26] 冯宜萱. 以可持续规划缔造公营房屋优质居住环境:香港房屋委员会的经验[J]. 国际城市规划, 2013, 28(1): 30-36.

    [27] 香港规划署. 新界规划小册子—— 将军澳[EB/OL]. (2017-02-01)[2003-01-08]. http://www.pland.gov.hk/pland_sc/press/publication/nt_pamphlet02/tko_html/hist.html.

    [28] Forrest R, Kearns A. Social Cohesion and Urban Inclusion for Disadvantaged Neighbourhoods[M]. New York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 1999.

    [29] Kim J Y, Kim B, Park K S, et al. Health-related Quality of Life with KDQOL-36 and Its Association with Self-efficacy and Treatment Satisfaction in Korean Dialysis Patients[J]. Quality of Life Research, 2013, 22(4): 753-758.

    [30] Rothenberg J. Economic Evaluation of Urban Renewal: Conceptual Foundation of Benefit-cost Analysis[M]. Washington: The Brookings Institution, 1969.

    [31] Che M C O. Urbanization Versus Urban Planning Practice in Malaysia: Considerations, Prospects and Possibilities[M] // Yeh A G O, Ng M K, eds. Planning for a Better Urban Living Environment in Asia. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000.

    [32] Healey P. Land Use Planning and the Mediation of Urban Change: The British Planning System in Practice[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

    [33] Streeten P. A Basic-needs Approach to Economic Development[M] // K A W. Jameson, C, ed. Directions in Economic Development[M]. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1979.

    [34] Weaver C. Regional Development and the Local Community, Planning, Politics, and Social Context[M]. Avon: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1984.

    [35] 叶嘉安. 香港城市发展经验对内地的启示[J]. 紫荆论坛, 2014,14: 18-24.


《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

7763375