郑德高 袁海琴

Zheng Degao, Yuan Haiqin

关键词：校区；园区；社区；三区融合；创新空间；发展动力

Keywords：Campus; Industrial Park; Community; Integration of Three Zones; Innovation Space; Development Force

摘要：

文章通过对创新理论的研究与梳理，认为创新空间理论的研究目前在国内外还处于萌芽状态。作者结合国内外城市创新空间案例，总结出当前的创新空间主要存在校区主导、园区主导和校区园区双主导三种创新空间模式，并从“校区、园区、社区”三区融合的角度提出了创新空间发展的理论模型，认为校区、园区和社区是城市创新的主要空间载体，三区融合是推动城市创新的关键发展动力。在此基础上，总结出三种典型的创新空间模式：圈层发展模式、园区社区化发展模式与融合发展模式。

Abstract：

In this paper, through the research on innovation theories, it thought innovation space theory research is still in the nascent state at home and abroad. Based on case studies of urban innovation space, it summarizes three innovation space models exist currently which include the campus dominant model, the industrial park dominant model and the campus-industrial park dominant model, and puts forward the theory model of the innovation space development from the perspective of integration of “campus, industrial park and community”, which thought that campus, industrial park and community are the main spaces of urban innovation and that integration of three zones is the key to push forward the innovation of urban development. On this basis, three spatial patterns are concluded, which are the circle-layer model, the industrial park communalization model and the integration development model.

郑德高，中国城市规划设计研究院副总规划师，上海分院院长，教授级高级工程师；同济大学建筑与城市规划学院博士研究生。zdg2000@163.com

袁海琴，中国城市规划设计研究院上海分院，规划二所所长

• [1] 熊彼特. 经济发展理论[M]. 孔伟艳, 朱攀峰, 等, 译. 北京出版社, 2008.

  [2] Rogers Everett M. Diffusion of Innovations[M]. New York: The Free Press, 1983.

  [3] Moore Geoffery A. Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High-tech Products to Mainstream Customers[M]. Harper Paperbacks, 2002: 16-152.

  [4] 杨华峰, 邱丹, 余艳. 创新型城市的评价指标体系[J]. 统计与决策, 2007, 11: 68-70.

  [5] Hospers G J. Creative Cities: Breeding Places in the Knowledge Economy[J]. Knowledge Technology & Policy, 2003, 16(3): 143-162.

  [6] Florida Richard. The Rise of the Creative Class[M]. Basic Books, 2002.

  [7] Glaeser Edward L, Kahn Matthew E. “Sprawl and Urban Growth,” Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics // Henderson J V, Thisse J

  F, eds. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics[M]. 1st ed. Elsevier, 2004(04): 2481-2527.

  [8] Etzkowitz H, Jose M, Mariza A. Towards “Meta-innovation”in Brazil: The Evolution of the Incubator and the Emergence of a Triple Helix. Research Policy, 2005.

  [9] Christian W M, Annette W S. The Top-level Global Research System, 1997-99: Centers, Networks and Nodality-Ananalysis Based on Bibliometric Indicators[J]. Urban Studies, 39(5/6): 903-927.

  [10] 张苏梅, 顾朝林, 葛幼松, 等. 论国家创新体系的空间结构[J]. 人文地理, 2001, 01: 51-54.

  [11] 曾鹏, 曾坚, 蔡良娃. 城市创新空间理论与空间形态结构研究[J]. 建筑学报, 2008(8): 34-38.

  [12] 陈秉钊, 范军勇. 大学城与知识创新区[J]. 规划师, 2006(10): 24.

  [13] Etzkowitz H. The Entrepreneurial University Wave: From Ivory Tower to Global Economic Engine[J]. Industry & Higher Education, 2014, 28(28).

  [14] Owen-Smith J, Riccaboni, Pammolli F. A Comparison of US and European University-Industry Relations in the Life Sciences[J]. Management Science, 2002, 48(1): 24-43.

  [15] Roberts E B, Eesley C E. Entrepreneurial Impact: The Role of MIT-An Updated Report[J]. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 2011, 7(1-2).

  [16] 卡斯特尔 M, 霍尔 P. 世界的高技术中心——21 世纪产业综合体的形成[M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 1998.

  [17] 魏新镇, 王缉慈, 等. 新的产业空间——高技术产业开发区的发展与布局[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1993.

  [18] 吕拉昌, 李勇. 基于城市创新的中国创新城市空间体系[J]. 地理学报, 2010(2): 179-190.

  [19] 方创琳, 马海涛, 王振波, 等. 中国创新型城市建设的综合评估与空间格局分异[J]. 地理学报, 2014(4): 459-473.

  
  

• 收起