点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:0
2019年第1期   DOI:
疗愈导向的街道设计:基于VR实验的探索
Healing Oriented Street Design: Experimental Explorations via Virtual Reality

徐磊青 孟若希 黄舒晴 陈筝

Xu Leiqing, Meng Ruoxi, Huang Shuqing, Chen Zheng

关键词:城市更新;健康街道;疗愈环境;恢复性环境;VR ;绿视率; 街道界面

Keywords:Urban Renewal; Healthy Street; Healing Environment; Restorative Environment; Virtual Reality Technology; Green Vision; Street Interface

摘要:

本文以两个VR 实验对城市环境的疗愈性进行了研究。第一个VR 实验采用沉浸感极好的虚幻4 建模,虚拟了道路和绿地两种不同的城市环境。皮电数据表明绿地比道路景观有更好的疗愈性。第二个实验以绿视率和街道界面的不同水平建构了街道模型,以HTC 的头盔展示虚拟环境。实验结果表明绿视率和街道界面都对街道的疗愈性有显著影响。论文最后总结了绿视率和街道界面对街道疗愈的影响,并以城市更新为背景,论述了疗愈性街道的设计策略。


Abstract:

This paper designs two virtual reality experiments to study the healing potential of urban environment. The first one uses Unreal Engine 4 with excellent immersion to model two different urban environments: streets and another with green space. Sympathetic conductance response data shows that green space has better healing potential than streets. In the second experiment, street models are constructed at different levels of green vision and street interfaces, and HTC helmet is used to display the virtual environment. The experimental result shows that that both the green viewing rate and the street interfaces have significant effects on healing potential on streets. Finally, the paper summarizes the influence of green vision rate and street interfaces on the healing potential of streets, and discusses the design strategies of Healing Street based on urban renewal.


版权信息:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51778422,51878461),中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(22120180084),上海市城市更新及其空间优化技术重点实验室开放课题资助(201810201)
作者简介:

徐磊青,同济大学建筑与城市规划学院教授,博导。leiqing@tongji.edu.cn

孟若希,上海市黄浦区规划和土地管理局科员。272443564@qq.com

黄舒晴,同济大学建筑与城市规划学院博士研究生。shuqinghuang@tongji.edu.cn

陈筝(通信作者),同济大学建筑与城市规划学院副教授。zhengchen@tongji.edu.cn


译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] 徐磊青. 街道转型—一部公共空间的现代简史[J]. 时代建筑, 2017(6): 6-11.

    [2] 里德·尤因, 苏珊·汉迪. 测量不可测的: 与可步行性相关的城市设计品质[J]. 国际城市规划, 2012(5): 43-53.

    [3] 徐磊青, 施婧. 步行活动品质与建成环境——以上海三条商业街为例[J]. 上海城市规划, 2017(1): 17-24.

    [4] PEDERSEN C B, MORTENSEN P B. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between urbanicity during upbringing and schizophrenia risk[J]. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 2001(58): 1039-1046.

    [5] KAPLAN S, TALBOT J F. Psychological benefits of a wilderness experience[M] // ALTMAN I, WOHLWILL J F, eds. Human behavior and environment: advances in theory and research: behavior and the natural environmen. New York: Plenum Press, 1983: 163-203.

    [6] HARTIG T. Guest editor’s introduction[J]. Environment and Behavior, 2001, 33(4): 475-479.

    [7] HARTIG T, KORPELA K, EVANS G W, et al. A measure of restorative quality in environments[J]. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 1997, 14(4): 175-194.

    [8] ULRICH R S. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment[M] //ALTMAN I, WOHLWILL J F, eds. Human behavior and environment: advances in theory and research: behavior and the natural environment. New York: Plenum Press, 1983: 85-125.

    [9] APPLETON J H. Experience of landscape[M]. Wiley-Blackwell, 1975.

    [10] 徐磊青, 刘念, 卢济威. 公共空间密度、系数与微观品质对城市活力的影响——上海轨交站域的显微观察[J]. 新建筑, 2015(4): 21-26.

    [11] NORDHA H, HARTIG T, HAGERHALLA C M, et al. Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration[J]. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2009, 8(4): 225-235.

    [12] HELENA N, KJERSTI ?. Pocket parks for people – a study of park design and use[J]. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2013, 20(1): 12-17.

    [13] 徐磊青. 恢复性环境、健康和绿色城市主义[J]. 南方建筑, 2016(3): 101-107.

    [14] 陈筝, 翟雪倩, 叶诗韵, 等. 恢复性自然环境对城市居民心智健康影响的荟萃分析及规划启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2016(4): 16-26.

    [15] 吴立蕾, 王云. 城市道路绿视率及其影响因素[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2009, 27(3): 267-271.

    [16] JIANG B, CHANG C, SULLIVAN W. A dose of nature: tree cover, stress reduction, and gender differences[J].Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014(132): 26-36.

    [17] PALL J, LINDALA, TERRY H. Effects of urban street vegetation on judgments of restoration likelihood[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2015 (14): 200-209.

    [18] PALL J, LINDALA, TERRY H. Architectural variation, building height, and the restorative quality of urban residential streetscapes[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2013 (33): 26-36.

    [19] ARTHUR S. Mystery of environmental mysteryeffects of light, occlusion, and depth of view[J]. Environment and Behavior, 2007, 39(7): 165-197.

    [20] CAGRI I. Complexity, liking and familiarity: architecture and nonarchitecture Turkish students’ assessments of traditional and modern house facades[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2000(20): 5-16.

    [21] 徐磊青, 周峰, 吴人韦. 山景城市天际线的偏好与景观知觉: 建筑高度与视廊数量的影响[J]. 中国园林, 2013(10): 46-52.

    [22] 谭少华, 胡亚飞, 韩玲. 基于人群心理满足的城市美丽街道环境特征研究[J]. 新建筑, 2016(1): 64-70.

    [23] 陈泳,赵杏花。基于步行者视角的街道底层界面研究——以上海市淮海路为例[J]. 城市规划, 2014(6): 24-31.

    [24] 徐磊青, 康琦. 商业街的空间与界面特征对步行者停留活动的影响——以上海市南京西路为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2014(3): 104-111.

    [25] 苏谦, 辛自强. 恢复性环境研究: 理论、方法与进展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010(1): 177-184.


《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

3616407