郭磊贤 吴唯佳

Guo Leixian, Wu Weijia

关键词：人居环境提升项目；自主性；公共投资；空间治理； 欧盟城市社区倡议

Keywords：Settlement Improvement Program; Subsidiarity; Public Investment; Spatial Governance; EU Urban Community Initiative

摘要：

当前，各类城市人居环境提升政策项目在我国广泛开展。从海外经验看，超地方组织和社会资本对城市事务的介入缓解了因地方政府财力有限导致的城市人居环境提升压力，并在此过程中形成了以“自主性”为原则、在激励与监测机制下保障地方主体自主权和公共投资绩效的城市人居环境提升政策项目组织模式，其中数欧盟城市社区倡议最为完善。我国相关政策具有在行政体系内部自上而下贯彻执行的惯性，但近年来的实践已表现出一定的“自主性”色彩。本文通过调研分析上海M 区的社区提升实践案例发现，基于“自主性”原则的项目组织架构能够适应我国城市发展制度环境并获得良好的项目实施效果，对于促进我国区域和城市治理现代化有借鉴意义，可从基层社区为起始逐步推广。

Abstract：

Currently, urban settlement improvement programs are widely promoted in China. As seen from the overseas experiences, the involvement of social capital and supra-local organizations in urban affairs alleviates the pressure on urban public resources that is due to the fiscal austerity of local governments. There has evolved a project management model of urban settlement improvement policy based on the ‘subsidiarity’ principle, of which EU’s Urban Community Initiative is a typical representative. Using an incentive and monitoring mechanism, this model guarantees the power of local authorities and the performance of public investment. In contrast, China’s relevant policies are usually implemented from top to bottom within the administration system, but some recent practices have indicated the emergence of ‘subsidiarity’. Through investigating the community enhancement program in M District in Shanghai, this paper found that the project management structure based on ‘subsidiarity’ can  adapt to the institutional environment of Chinese cities and obtain good implementation results. As a conclusion, such mode has reference signification to the modernization of China’s regional and urban governance, as well as community level  implementation.

郭磊贤，清华大学建筑学院，博士研究生。guoleixian@aliyun.com

吴唯佳（通信作者），清华大学建筑学院教授、博士生导师；首都区域空间规划研究北京市重点实验室，主任。wwjwu@tsinghua.edu.cn

• [1] PANIZZA R. The principle of subsidiarity[EB/OL]. Fact sheets on the European Union—2018.[2018-02-25]. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/en/FTU_1.2.2.pdf.

  [2] 简·雅各布斯. 美国大城市的死与生[M]. 金衡山, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2006.

  [3] FISCHLER R. Planning for social betterment: from standard of living to quality of life[M] // FREESTONE R, ed. Urban planning in a changing world: the twentieth century experience. London: E & FN Spon, 2000: 139-157.

  [4] GRAHAM S, MARVIN S. Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition[M]. Hove: Psychology Press, 2001.

  [5] WILSON D, GAME C. Local Government in the United Kingdom [M]. 5th, ed. Macmillian, 2011.

  [6] MACKINTOSH M. Partnership: issues of policy and negotiation[J]. Local economy: the journal of the local economy policy unit, 1992, 7(3): 210-224.

  [7] SHIMOMURA T, MATSUMOTO T. Policies to enhance the physical urban environment for competitiveness: a new partnership between public and private sectors[R]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2010.

  [8] Senatsverwaltung Für Stadtentwicklung. Learning from IBA-die IBA 1987 in Berlin[R]. Berlin: Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung, 2012.

  [9] United Nations. Urban land policies for the uninitiated[R]. Bangkok: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, 1997.

  [10] ECOTEC Consulting. Urban pilot projects annual report 1996[R]. Brussels: European Commission, 1998.

  [11] VAN DEN BERG L, BRAUN E, VAN DER MEER J. The urban dimension in European policy: history, actors and programmes[M] // VAN DEN BERG L, BRAUN E, VAN DER MEER J, ed. National policy responses to urban challenges in Europe. London: Routledge, 2016: 39-61.

  [12] European Commission. Partnership with the cities: the URBAN community initiative[R]. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2003.

  [13] HURTADO S D G. The implementation of the URBAN community initiative: a transformative driver towards collaborative urban regeneration? answers from Spain[J]. European journal of American studies, 2015, 10(3): 1-14.

  [14] GHK Consulting. Ex-post evaluation of URBAN community initiative 1994-1999[R]. Brussels: European Commission, 2003.

  [15] TORTOLA P D. Europeanization in time: assessing the legacy of URBAN in a mid-size Italian city[J]. European planning studies, 2016, 24(1): 96-115.

  [16] ECOTEC Consulting. Ex-post evaluation of cohesion policy programmes 2000-06: the URBAN community initiative[R]. Brussels: European Commission, 2010.

  [17] DOSSI S. Urban governance encounters europeanization: The case of the community initiative URBAN II in Bordeaux and Genoa[J]. Regional and federal studies, 2012, 22(2): 159-175.

  [18] 曲凌雁“. 合作伙伴组织”政策的发展与创新——英国城市治理经验[J]. 国际城市规划, 2013(6): 73-81.

  
  

  
  

• 收起