点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:262
2020年第6期   DOI:10.19830/j.upi.2019.193
因灾群体居住安置路径选择模式的国际比较研究
International Comparison Research on the Pattern of Affected Inhabitants’ Choice of Post-disaster Resettlement

郗皎如 铃木萨琪 王江波

Xi Jiaoru, Suzuki Sachi, Wang Jiangbo

关键词:灾后住房重建;居住安置路径;群体选择;国际比较研究;汶川地震; 新奥尔良飓风;东日本地震

Keywords:Post-disaster Housing Reconstruction; Resettlement Route; Affected Inhabitants’ Choice; International Comparison Research; Wenchuan Earthquake; Katrina Hurricane; Great East Japan Earthquake

摘要:

本文以三个巨灾后典型受灾市镇——中国汶川地震(2008 年)受灾的都江堰市、美国卡特里娜飓风(2005 年)受灾的新奥尔良市、东日本地震(2011 年)受灾的七浜町——的住房重建过程为研究对象,分别构建三个案例的因灾群体居住安置路径选择框架,以通常被忽视的群体视角审视住房重建规划策略对群体安置的影响,并通过“政府方的重建任务”和“受灾居民方的安置选择”两个维度分析各自的框架特点。再通过三个案例框架特点的横向比较,分析其异同、优势及问题、背后成因,为中国的灾后住房重建规划策略在减轻政府负担,完成艰巨的住房重建任务,受灾群体的安置选择更具自主性、多样性、灵活性等方面提出优化建议。


Abstract:

The study thoroughly compared three post-disaster cities on their decisionmaking frameworks for affected inhabitants’ resettlement: Dujiangyan City in China after Wenchuan Earthquake, New Orleans in the US after Katrina Hurricane, and Shichigahama Town in Japan after the Great East Japan Earthquake. Their frameworks are mapped out from two dimensions: the “role of government” and the “choice of inhabitants”. Through analyzing the similarities and differences among the three cases, as well as their strengths, weaknesses, and their underlying problems, the research concludes to propose a series of practices for post-disaster housing reconstruction planning in Chinese regions. It is expected to help coping with some crucial issues that China has faced with: the mitigation of government burdens after extremely serious disasters, and the realization of more autonomous, diverse, and flexible resettlement choices for disaster-affected inhabitants in China.


版权信息:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年项目(52008204),教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(19YJCZH191),日本学术振兴会基金(16J02703)资助
作者简介:

郗皎如,南京工业大学建筑学院,讲师。daixiruster@163.com

铃木萨琪,联合国科教文组织雅加达办公室,助理研究员。sachi.suzuki.11@gmail.com

王江波,南京工业大学建筑学院,教授,硕士生导师。wjb623@163.com


译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. Economic losses, poverty and disasters 1998-2017[R]. Belgium: UNISDR, 2018.

    [2] JOHNSON L A, HAYASHI H. Synthesis efforts in disaster recovery research[J]. International journal of mass emergencies & disasters, 2012, 30(2): 212-238.

    [3] MENO F, NAKABAYASHI I. Support measures for reconstruction of condominiums damaged by earthquakes–comparative study on the Hanshin-Awaji earthquake of 1995 in Japan and the 921 Chi-Chi earthquake of 1999 in Taiwan[J]. Journal of Asian architecture and building engineering, 2008, 7(2): 325-332.

    [4] SUZUKI S, ONODA Y, TSUKUDA H. The role of multiple stakeholders and their collaboration in post-disaster housing recovery–different approaches in hurricane Katrina and great east Japan earthquake[C] // Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Architectural Interchanges in Asia. Sendai, Japan: Architectural Institute of Japan, 2016: 1840-1845.

    [5] 宮入興一. 四川大震災の災害像の実体と復興政策の理念現実[M]. 草津: 立命館経済学, 2010: 99-127.

    [6] 四川省住房和城乡建设厅. 512 汶川特大地震四川灾后重建城乡规划实践[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2013.

    [7] XI J, ONODA Y, TSUKUDA H. Various development of counterpart assistance in post-disaster reconstruction[J]. Journal of architecture and planning (transactions of Architectural Institute of Japan), 2016, 81(724): 1291-1301.

    [8] DAVIS I, ALEXANDER D. Recovery from disaster[M]. London and New York: Routledge, 2015.

    [9] COMERIO M C. Housing recovery in Chile: a qualitative mid-program review[M]. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Headquarters at the University of California, 2013.

    [10] COMERIO M C. Disaster recovery and community renewal: housing approaches[J]. Cityscape, 2014, 16(2): 51-68.

    [11] HIDAYAT B, EGBU C O. A literature review of the role of project management in post-disaster reconstruction[C] // 26th Annual ARCOM Conference Proceedings. Leeds: Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 2010: 1269-1278.

    [12] 胡以志. 对话爱德华·布莱克力教授——美国新奥尔良重建与中国汶川大地震灾后重建[J]. 国际城市规划, 2008(3): 120-122.

    [13] 罗伯特·奥申斯基, 蒂摩·西格林, 劳里·约翰逊, 等. 卡特里娜飓风后新奥尔良的重建规划和住房政策[J]. 城市发展研究, 2012, 19(5): 100-110.

    [14] 塩崎賢明, 出口俊一, 西川榮一. 災害復興ガイド――日本と世界の経験に学ぶ[M]. 神户: 兵庫県震災復興研究センター,「災害復興がいど」編集委員会, 2007.

    [15] 仇保兴. 借鉴日本经验求解四川灾后规划重建的若干难题[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2008(6): 5-15.

    [16] 顾福妹. 中日灾后重建规划比较研究[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2012.

    [17] 郗皎如, 加藤優一, 佃悠, 等. 东日本大震灾灾后重建规划进展缓慢原因分析[J]. 结构工程师, 2015, 31(2): 57-66.

    [18] 東北大学建築空間学研究室. 七ヶ浜町菖蒲田浜災害公営住宅[J]. 新建築, 2016, 91(13): 106-109.

    [19] 仲里英晃, 村尾修, 杉安和也. インドネシア·バンダアチェにおける2004 年インド洋津波後の生活再建過程の構造化[J]. 日本建築学会計画系論文集, 2009, 74(639): 1257-1264.


《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

5604997