点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:640
2021年第3期   DOI:10.19830/j.upi.2021.115
“总体性”与“开放性”的延续 —— 再读《空间的生产》导读
To Keep “Totality” and “Openness”: An Introduction of the Special Issue “Rereading The Production of Space”

杨舢

Yang Shan

关键词:空间的生产 ;总体性 ;开放性 ;矛盾辩证法 ;空间矛盾

Keywords:The Production of Space; Totality; Openness; Dialectics of Contradictions; Spatial Contradictions

摘要:

本文阐述了推出“再读《空间的生产》”专辑的主要原因。选择在这个时 间点以《空间的生产》为主题展开专题讨论,首先有缅怀和致敬其作者列斐伏尔 之意。这本经典著作早已成为空间和都市研究绕不开的里程碑,但是与其声名日 隆相随的是误读和曲解。更重要的是,以《空间的生产》和《日常生活批判》为 代表的列斐伏尔思想开启了诸多问题域,这些问题域与当下中国的现实处境有着 深刻的内在关联。不同于其他大师文集的讨论,这次专辑讨论并不局限于纯粹的 城市规划和设计范畴,也不以达成某种标准理解为目的。列斐伏尔思想中的“总 体性”和“开放性”的立场决定了此次专辑的这些特点。通过这一专题研究,我 们希望能够在城市与空间研究中延续“总体性”和“开放性”的立场。

Abstract:

The article gives an account of the reasons why the special issue “Rereading The Production of Space” is launched. First of all, it is dedicated to memorize the Master, Henri Lefebvre. His classical work The Production of Space has already become the milestone which contemporary urban and spatial research cannot evade. However, misreading and misinterpreting have accompanied with its increasing reputation. Moreover, it is the problematique Lefebvre opens up in his theory and its intrinsic connection to Chinese realistic situation that has the important implication. Unlike other issues of Master anthology, this issue neither limits itself in the sheer discipline category of urban planning and design, nor aims to achieve some standard understandings. It is the totality and openness inherent in Lefebvrian thoughts that determine the characteristics of the issue. Through the research, we hope the urban and spatial research could remain the totality and openness.

版权信息:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金“以过程和使用为导向、多元主体影响下的‘过渡使用’城 市设计方法与策略研究”(51878327)
作者简介:

杨舢,博士,南京大学建筑与城市规划学院,副研究员。y_sampan@sina.cn

译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] 爱德华·索亚. 第三空间: 去往洛杉矶和其他真实和想象地方的旅程[M]. 陆扬 , 刘佳林 , 朱志荣 , 等译 . 上海 : 上海教育出版社 , 2005. 

    [2] 刘怀玉 . 今天我们为何要重访列斐弗尔 [J]. 马克思主义与现实 , 2020(1): 93-102. 

    [3] LEFEBVRE H. Toward a leftist cultural politics: remarks occasioned by the centenary of Marx’s death[M] // NELSON C, CROSSBERG L, eds. Marxism and the interpretation of culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1988: 75-88.

     [4] LEFEBVRE H. The production of space[M]. London: Blackwell Publishing, 1991. 

    [5] 刘怀玉 .《空间的生产》若干问题研究 [J]. 哲学动态,2014(11): 18-28. 

    [6] STANEK L. Henri Lefebvre on space: architecture, urban research, and the production of theory[M]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011. 

    [7] CHARNOCK G. Challenging new state spatialities: the open Marxism of Henri Lefebvre[J]. Antipode, 2010, 42(5): 1279-1303. 

    [8] SCHMID C. The trouble with Henri: urban research and the theory of the production of space[M] // STANEK L, SCHMID C, MORAVANSZKY A, eds. Urban revolution now: Henri Lefebvre in social research and architecture. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014: 27-47. [9] KIPFER S, GOONEWARDENA K, SCHMID C, et al. On the production of Henri Lefebvre[M] // GOONEWARDENA K, KIPFER S, MILGROM R, et al, eds. Space, difference, everyday life: reading Henri Lefebvre. New York & London: Routledge, 2008: 1-23.

《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

7743560