赖楚杨 王红扬

Lai Chuyang, Wang Hongyang

关键词：《新城市议程》；包罗一切；线性逻辑；拼贴局部；整体主义

Keywords：New Urban Agenda; Everything; Linear Logic; Collage of Part; Holism

摘要：

《新城市议程》是联合国住房和城市可持续大会（“人居三”）最重要的文本成果。本文通过对《新城市议程》内容和形成逻辑的展现和解读，说明其中潜藏的线性拼贴的“规划包罗一切”逻辑，解释其发生的过程和存在的问题。传统的思维方式在面对规划对象复杂和开放程度逐渐增加时，遇到了everything 和nothing 的瓶颈。随着规划目标不断扩张、规划内容不断丰富，知识库发生了新的有益扩展，但也掩盖和模糊了许多内在矛盾和冲突。由于思维本能具有的同时性逻辑导致的必然性，在评价与证明《新城市议程》“包罗一切”的同时，也在试图通过猜想和检验构建一个城市各要素及其关系的整体一致性相对最优的参照体系。本文是非先验的、同时性的、关系一致的整体主义思维的具体文本实践运用。

Abstract：

The New Urban Agenda is the most important outcome of the United Nations Conference on Housing and Urban Sustainability (the“Habitat III” Conference). This paper contains an explanation of the structure of the text exposes the hidden linear and collage logic of “planning becomes everything”. How does this happen and what’s the problem? The traditional paradigm of thinking meets the bottleneck of “everything” and “nothing” as the planning objects get more complex and open. With the constant expansion of planning objectives and enriched planning contents, internal contradictions and conflicts are concealed and blurred, however. It is also attempted to construct a relatively optimal reference system for the holistic conformity of urban elements and their relations through guessing and testing, because of the inevitability of instinctive synchronic thinking logic. In a word, this paper is a practical application of a no-priori, synchronic and relationconforming holistic thinking paradigm.

赖楚杨，南京大学建筑与城市规划学院，硕士研究生。ashleychuyang@163.com

王红扬（通信作者），博士，南京大学建筑与城市规划学院教授，南京大学—东巴黎大学中法城市·区域·规划研究中心中方主任，南京大学—以色列理工学院中以规划创新中心中方主任。hongyang@nju.edu.cn

• [1] UN Habitat. The Vancouver declaration on human settlements[EB/OL]. Vancouver: United Nations Conference on Human Settlements, 1976. (1976-06-11)[2020-02-10]. http://habitat.scarp.ubc.ca/habitat-i-document-archive/.

  [2] UN Habitat. The habitat agenda-Istanbul declaration on human settlements[EB/OL]. Istanbul: The Second United Nations Conference on Human Settlements, 1996. (1996-08-07)[2020-02-10]. http://habitat.scarp.ubc.ca/habitat-ii-document-archive/.

  [3] UN Habitat. New urban agenda[EB/OL]. Quito: United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development, 2017. (2016-10-20)[2020-02-10]. http://habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda/.

  [4] 新城市议程[J]. 城市规划, 2016, 40(12): 19-32.

  [5] 吴志强“. 人居三”对城市规划学科的未来发展指向[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2016(6): 7-12.

  [6] 石楠.“ 人居三”、《新城市议程》及其对我国的启示[J]. 城市规划, 2017, 41(1): 9-21.

  [7] 张振山, 章沐曦.《 新城市议程》的解读与落实[J]. 现代城市研究, 2017(8): 5-8, 14.

  [8] 陈小坚.《 新城市议程》框架下的城乡关系解读[J]. 现代城市研究, 2017(8): 9-14.

  [9] 李翔, 魏嘉彬. 从关注经济增长到公平正义：联合国三次人居大会历程梳理浅析[C] // 2017 城市发展与规划论文集. 海口, 2017.

  [10] 王红扬. 人居三、中等发展陷阱的本质与我国后中等发展期规划改革：再论整体主义[J]. 国际城市规划, 2017, 32(1): 1-25. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2016.566.

  [11] 王红扬. 整体主义与空间的政治经济学的本质——评《为增长而规划：中国城市与区域规划》[J]. 国际城市规划, 2016, 31(3): 3-15.

  [12] 王红扬. 对新时背景下中国城市化研究的方法论思考[J]. 城市规划,2000(6): 7-16, 21.

  [13] HALL P. 规划：新千年的回顾与展望[J]. 国外城市规划, 2004（4）:23-34.

  
  

• 收起