唐燕

Tang Yan

关键词：城市更新 ；制度 ；治理尺度 ；动力机制 ；管控要素

Keywords：Urban Regeneration; Institution; Governance Scale; Driving Force; Control Elements

摘要：

城市更新制度建设近年来已上升为我国的热点话题。这一方面与 社会经济转型带来的城市存量发展阶段息息相关，另一方面与城市更新 行动在实践中遇到的一系列亟待解决的阻力和问题密不可分。由于缺乏 系统的理论指导和有效的制度设计，当前我国各地城市更新工作的开展 面临着诸多挑战与困境。本文在解读城市更新制度内涵的基础上，针对 我国更新制度建设的现实进展和薄弱环节，从“治理尺度—动力机制— 管控要素”三方面探讨城市更新制度建设的关键维度和策略做法，包括 建立国家和地方相互支撑的城市更新政策体系、针对城市更新项目的动 力强弱实行差异化管控、建构“主体—空间—资金”相适配的系统化更 新规则等，为推进我国城市更新的制度创新和政策完善提供思路参照。

Abstract：

The construction of urban regeneration institution has risen to be a hot topic in China in recent years. On the one hand, it is closely related to the urban “internal” development era brought about by socio-economic transformation; on the other hand, it is inextricably linked to a series of obstacles encountered in the urban regeneration practices. At present, due to the lack of systematic theoretical guidance and effective institutional design, the implementation of urban regeneration in China is facing many challenges and difficulties. Therefore, based on interpretation of the meanings of urban regeneration and its institutions, as well as surrounding the practical progress and weak spots of institutional construction in urban regeneration of China, this paper discusses the key fields and strategies of the institutional construction of urban regeneration from three aspects of “scale-control -elements”, including the establishment of integrated national and local urban regeneration policy system, the implementation of differentiated control measures for urban regeneration projects with various motivations, and the systematically construction of compatible “subject-space-capital” regeneration rules, so as to provide references for promoting institutional reform and improving policies of urban regeneration in China.

唐燕，博士，清华大学建筑学院，长聘副教授，博士生导师。 yantang@tsinghua.edu.cn

• [1] 王蒙徽 . 实施城市更新行动 [EB/OL]. (2020-03-14)[2020-11-17]. http:// www.mohurd.gov.cn/jsbfld/202011/t20201117_248050.html. 

  [2] 唐燕 , 杨东 , 祝贺 . 城市更新制度建设 ：广州、深圳、上海的比较 [M]. 北京 : 清华大学出版社 , 2019. 

  [3] 阳建强, 陈月. 1949—2019年中国城市更新的发展与回顾[J]. 城市规划, 2020, 44(2): 9-19, 31. 

  [4] 丁凡 , 伍江 . 城市更新相关概念的演进及在当今的现实意义 [J]. 城市规 划学刊 , 2017(6): 87-95. 

  [5] ROBERTS P W, SYKES H. Urban regeneration: a handbook[M]. London: SAGE, 2000. 

  [6] 方可 . 西方城市更新的发展历程及其启示 [J]. 城市规划汇刊 , 1998(1): 59-61, 51-66. 

  [7] 张庭伟 . 从城市更新理论看理论溯源及范式转移 [J]. 城市规划学刊 , 2020(1): 9-16.

  [8] NORTH D C. Institutions[J]. Journal of economic perspective, 1991(5): 97- 12. 

  [9] TALLON A. Urban regeneration in the UK (2nd version)[M]. London: Routledge, 2013. 

  [10] 杨连强 . 利益差别与政策博弈 ：中央与地方关系的另类解读 [J]. 重庆 社会科学 , 2006(7): 101-105. 

  [11] MUSTERD S, OSTENDORF W. Integrated urban renewal in the Netherlands: a critical appraisal[J]. Urban research and practice, 2008(1): 78-92. 

  [12] HESSE M. On borrowed size, flawed urbanisation and emerging enclave spaces: the exceptional urbanism of Luxembourg, Luxembourg[J]. European urban and regional studies, 2016, 23(4): 612-624. 

  [13] LEARY M E, McCARTHY J. The Routledge companion to urban regeneration[M]. London: Routledge, 2013. 

  [14] 吕斌 . 日本实施城市更新的制度构建与施策体系 [EB/OL]. (2020-03-14) [2021-02-02]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/i0MsDWe1ibyxYDVyEhf8pA. 

  [15] 柯于璋. 社区主义治理模式之理论与实践——兼论台湾地区社区政策[J]. 公共行政学报 , 2005(9): 33-57.

• 收起