点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:285
2022年第3期   DOI:10.19830/j.upi.2020.098
中国城市空间生产中的企业主义——上海世博园土地再开发机制研究
Entrepreneurialism in China’s Urban Space Production: Exploring Land Redevelopment Mechanism of Shanghai Expo Park

李凌月 李曼雪 肖扬

Li Lingyue, Li Manxue, Xiao Yang

关键词:资本积累 ;企业主义 ;土地开发 ;上海世博园 ; 国有企业

Keywords:Capital Accumulation; Entrepreneurialism; Land Development; Shanghai Expo Park; State-owned Enterprises

摘要:

改革开放引入市场经济以来,我国城市空间生产呈现政企联盟的企业主义特征已是学界共识。地方政府与私有资本或外资形成增长机器推动了城市中资本的快速积累。不过近年来研究者发现,由城市土地(再)开发推动的大规模空间生产中,政府力量在市场中普遍存在,表现出以各级政府及其派出机构和国有企业主导的企业主义特征。本文通过上海世博园的空间生产,详细审视了各级政府及其平台企业在资本积累中的角色和互动,从权力博弈、资本运作和招商引资三个维度,揭示了其不同于西方国家侧重获取交换价值实现经济利益而关注国有利益的空间生产路径。

Abstract:

Since the introduction of market economy in Economic Refom and Opening Up period, scholars have reached consensus that China’s urban space production has been promoted by diverse growth coalitions, characterized by urban entrepreneurialism. However, in recent years, researchers have found that in large-scale space production promoted by urban land (re)development, government forces are ubiquitous in the market, showing distinctive characteristics of state-owned entrepreneurialism. This paper examines the role and interaction of governments and their affiliated platforms at multiple levels in capital accumulation through the space production of the Shanghai Expo Park, revealing a space production path from three dimensions of power game, capital operation and attracting investmant that is different from the Western countries, where exchange value for economic benefits have been prioritized.

版权信息:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(51808391),国家社科基金面上项目(19BSH035)
作者简介:

李凌月,同济大学建筑与城市规划学院城市规划系,助理教授。lilingyue929@gmail.com 

李曼雪,同济大学建筑与城市规划学院城市规划系,硕士研究生 

肖扬(通信作者),同济大学建筑与城市规划学院城市规划系,副教授。yxiao@tongji.edu.cn

译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] HARVEY D. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism[J]. Geografiska annaler, 1989, 71(1): 3-17. 

    [2] CARRIèRE J-P, DEMAZIERE C. Urban planning and flagship development projects: lessons from EXPO 98, Lisbon[J]. Planning practice and research, 2002, 17(1): 69-79. 

    [3] CODECASA G, PONZINI D. Public-private partnership: a delusion for urban regeneration? evidence from Italy[J]. European planning studies, 2011, 19(4): 647-667. 

    [4] COQ-HUELVA, D. Urbanisation and financialisation in the context of a rescaling state: the case of Spain[J]. Antipode, 2013, 45(5): 1213-1231. 

    [5] SHEN J, WU F. The suburb as a space of capital accumulation: the development of new towns in Shanghai, China[J]. Antipode, 2017, 49(3): 761-780. 

    [6] LIN G C S. Scaling-up regional development in globalizing China: local capital accumulation, land-centred politics, and reproduction of space[J]. Regional studies, 2009, 43(3): 429-447. 

    [7] CHIEN S. Chinese eco-cities: a perspective of land-speculation-oriented local entrepreneurialism[J]. China information, 2013, 27(2): 173-196. 

    [8] JIANG Y, WALEY P, GONZALEZ S. Shifting land-based coalitions in Shanghai’s second hub[J]. Cities, 2016, 52: 30-38.

    [9] XU J, YEH A, WU F. Land commodification: new land development and politics in China since the late 1990s[J]. International journal of urban and regional research, 2009, 33(4): 890-913. 

    [10] HUANG D, CHAN R C. On ‘land finance’ in urban China: theory and practice[J]. Habitat international, 2018, 75: 96-104. 

    [11] HE S, WU F. Property-led redevelopment in post-reform China: a case study of Xintiandi redevelopment project in Shanghai[J]. Journal of urban affairs, 2005, 27(1): 1-23. 

    [12] YANG Y R, CHANG C H. An urban regeneration regime in China: a case study of urban redevelopment in Shanghai’s Taipingqiao Area[J]. Urban studies, 2007, 44(9): 1809-1826. 

    [13] QIAN Z. Institutions and local growth coalitions in China’s urban land reform: the case of Hangzhou High-Technology Zone[J]. Asia pacific viewpoint, 2007, 48(2): 219-233. 

    [14] HE S, WU F. China’s emerging neoliberal urbanism: perspectives from urban redevelopment[J]. Antipode, 2009, 41(2): 282-304. 

    [15] JIANG Y, WALEY P. Shenhong: the anatomy of an urban investment and development company in the context of China’s state corporatist urbanism[J]. Journal of contemporary China, 2018, 27(112): 596-610. 

    [16] LI J, CHIU L H R. Urban investment and development corporations, new town development and China’s local state restructuring–the case of Songjiang new town, Shanghai[J]. Urban geography, 2018, 39(5): 687-705. 

    [17] WANG Z, WU F. In-situ marginalisation: social impact of Chinese mega projects[J]. Antipode, 2019, 51(5): 1640-1663. 

    [18] LEFEBVRE H. The production of space[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992. 

    [19] HARVEY D. The limits to capital[M]. London and New York: Verso, 2018. 

    [20] SOJA E W. Seeking spatial justice[M]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010. 

    [21] LI L. State rescaling and national new area development in China: the case of Chongqing Liangjiang[J]. Habitat international, 2015, 50: 80-89. 

    [22] CHUNG C, ZHANG F, WU F. Negotiating green space with landed interests: the urban political ecology of greenway in the Pearl River Delta, China[J]. Antipode, 2018, 50(4): 891-909. 

    [23] 李凌月. 转型时期欧美及中国城市重构研究——基于西方文献的解读[J]. 国际城市规划 , 2020, 35(3): 9-14. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2018.428. 

    [24] PHELPS N A, MIAO J T. Varieties of urban entrepreneurialism[J]. Dialogues in human geography, 2019: 1-18. 

    [25] SWYNGEDOUW E, MOULAERT F, RODRIGUEZ A. Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy[J]. Antipode, 2002, 34(3): 542-577. 

    [26] LEHRER U, LAIDLEY J. Old mega-projects newly packaged? waterfront redevelopment in Toronto[J]. International journal of urban & regional research, 2008, 32(4): 786-803. 

    [27] FAINSTEIN S S. Mega-projects in New York, London and Amsterdam[J]. International journal of urban & regional research, 2008, 32(4): 768-785. 

    [28] LOGAN J, MOLOTCH H L. Urban fortunes: the political economy of place[M]. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1987. 

    [29] STONE C N. Regime politics: governing Atlanta, 1946-1988[M]. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas Lawrence, 1989. 

    [30] 曹湛 , 彭震伟 , 毕胜 . “城市企业主义”——一个转轨期我国城乡空间现象的分析视角 [J]. 现代城市研究 , 2016, 27(10): 79-86, 101. 

    [31] 栾峰 , 何丹 . 企业家城市 :城市发展理论的内涵及其批判 [J]. 城市规划学刊 , 2005(2): 50-54. 

    [32] 殷洁 , 罗小龙 , 程叶青 , 等 . 基于企业家型城市理论的工矿资源型城市转型——以马鞍山市为例 [J]. 地理科学 , 2010, 30(3): 329-335. 

    [33] 张勇 , 何深静 . 城市企业主义视角下的政府转型——中部小城济源的发展路径 [J]. 人文地理 , 2015, 30(2): 65-71. [34] WU F. Planning centrality, market instruments: governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism[J]. Urban studies, 2018, 55(7): 1383-1399. 

    [35] 易晓峰 . 合作与权力下放 :1980 年代以来英国城市复兴的组织手段 [J]. 国际城市规划 , 2009, 24(3): 59-64. 

    [36] MILHAUPT C J, ZHENG W. Reforming China’s state-owned enterprises: institutions, not ownership[M] // MILHAUPT C J, LIEBMAN B L, eds. Regulating the visible hand?: the institutional implications of Chinese State capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. 

    [37] CHAN R C K, LI L. Entrepreneurial city and the restructuring of urban space in Shanghai Expo[J]. Urban geography, 2017, 38(5): 666-686. 

    [38] JIANG Y, WALEY P, GONZALEZ S. Shanghai swings: the Hongqiao project and competitive urbanism in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Environment and planning a, 2016, 48(10): 1928-1947. 

    [39] RAMO J C. The Shanghai bubble[J]. Foreign policy, 1998, 111: 64-75. 

    [40] MCCANN E. Urban Policy Mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: toward a research agenda[J]. Urban insight, 2013, 101(1): 107-130. 

    [41] LI L. A mega-event approach to glurbanization: insights from Expo 2010, Shanghai[J]. Journal of geographical research, 2019, 2(1): 1-12.

《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

7758290