点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:206
2022年第3期   DOI:10.19830/j.upi.2020.064
澳大利亚“先验”规划评估的理性、实践及其借鉴——以悉尼市为例
Rationality and Practice of Australian “a Priori” Planning Evaluation and Its Reference to China: Case of Sydney

高煜 张京祥

Gao Yu, Zhang Jingxiang

关键词:“先验”规划评估 ;评估理性 ;城市治理 ;制度化 ; 框架规划 ;澳大利亚

Keywords:“A Priori” Planning Evaluation; Evaluation Rationality; Urban Governance; Institutionalisation; Framework Planning; Australia

摘要:

中国当前的规划评估研究主要以“事后”规划实施评估为主,对“先验”规划评估少有研究,但此类评估能显著提高规划决策的正确性和有效性。本文以“先验”规划评估发展较为成熟的澳大利亚悉尼市为例,具体阐述其“一个框架、专项指引、多方主体参与”的“先验”规划评估机制的理性和实施策略,认为其评估介入规划的阶段、对多方主体有序参与规划评估的制度保障,以及跨部门协同评估等做法能有效提高规划决策的质量,是对中国规划实施评估体系的有机补充,对完善中国规划体系有一定的借鉴意义。

Abstract:

The planning evaluation research in China has not yet constituted a complete system, mainly focusing on “ex post facto” planning-implementation evaluation research, as opposed to“a priori” planning evaluation, but such evaluation can improve the accuracy and effectiveness of decisions-making, and can better reflect the attribute of “public policy” in planning. This paper takes the planning evaluation practice of Sydney, Australia as an example, and specifically explains the rational background and specific practices of its “a priori” planning evaluation mechanism of “a framework, special guidance, and multi-party participation”, and considers its evaluation to effectively improve the quality of planning decision-making, and are an organic supplement to planning implementation evaluation system, for its involvement in the phases of planning , the legislations for the systematic participation of multiple parties in planning and evaluation, and the cross-sectoral collaborative evaluation and other specific practices. Thus, this paper holds that it can have a certain degree of reference to improve the planning evaluation system in China.

版权信息:
基金项目:
作者简介:

高煜,南京大学建筑与城市规划学院,博士研究生。564d@163.com 

张京祥(通信作者),博士,南京大学建筑与城市规划学院教授、博士生导师,中国城市规划学会常务理事,中国城市规划学会城乡治理与政策研究学术委员会主任委员。3593786@163.com

译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] TALEN E. After the plans: methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans[J]. Journal of planning education and research, 1996, 2(16): 79-97. 

    [2] ALEXANDER E R, FALUDI A. Planning and plan implementation: notes on evaluation criteria[J]. Environment and planning b: planning and design, 1989, 2(16): 127-140. 

    [3] FALUDI A. A decision-centred view of environmental planning[J]. Landscape planning, 1985, 3(12): 239-256. 

    [4] ALEXANDER E. Evolution and status: where is planning-evaluation today and how did it get here?[M] // Evaluation in planning : evolution and prospects. London: Routledge, 2016: 3-18. 

    [5] 孙施文 , 周宇 . 城市规划实施评价的理论与方法 [J]. 城市规划汇刊 , 2003(2): 15-20, 27-95. 

    [6] 马璇 , 张一凡 . 我国城市总体规划实施评估工作评析及建议——基于省市调研的若干思考 [J]. 规划师 , 2016, 32(3): 34-41. 

    [7] 汪军 , 陈曦 . 西方规划评估机制的概述——基本概念、内容、方法演变以及对中国的启示 [J]. 国际城市规划 , 2011, 26(6): 78-83. 

    [8] 梁学功 , 刘娟 . 中国实施规划环评可能出现的问题及其解决方法 [J]. 环境科学 , 2004(6): 163-166. 

    [9] 桂萍 . 重大行政决策之公众参与制度 [D]. 苏州:苏州大学 , 2016. 

    [10] 张京祥 , 陈浩 . 空间治理 :中国城乡规划转型的政治经济学 [J]. 城市规划 , 2014, 38(11): 9-15. 

    [11] ALEXANDER E. Evaluations and rationalities: reasoning with values in planning[M] // Evaluation in planning: evolution and prospects. London: Routledge, 2016: 39-52. 

    [12] PATASSINI D. Beyond benefit cost analysis: accounting for non-market values in planning evaluation[M]. London: Taylor and Francis, 2017. 

    [13] WILDAVSKY A. If planning is everything, maybe it’s nothing[J]. Policy sciences, 1973, 2(4): 127-153. 

    [14] ALEXANDER E. Dilemmas in evaluating planning, or back to basics: what is planning for?[J]. Planning theory & practice, 2009, 2(10): 233-244. 

    [15] FREESTONE R. A historical perspective[M] // THOMPSON S, MAGINN P. Planning Australia: an overview of urban and regional planning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 17-33. 

    [16] HU R. Shaping a global Sydney: the City of Sydney’s planning transformation in the 1980s and 1990s[J]. Planning perspectives, 2012, 3(27): 347-368. 

    [17] WILLIAMS P. Statutory planning[M] // THOMPSON S, MAGINN P J, eds. Planning Australia: an overview of urban and regional planning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 98-118. 

    [18] Treasury NSW. NSW government guidelines for economic appraisal[R]. 2007. 

    [19] Transport for NSW. Principles and guidelines for economic appraisal of transport investment and initiatives: transport economic appraisal guidelines, evaluation and benefits, finance and investment[R]. 2016. 

    [20] NSW Health. Guide to cost-benefit analysis of health captial projects[R]. 2018. 

    [21] THOMAS I. Environmental impact assessment in Australia: theory and practice[M]. 3rd ed. Leichhardt, NSW: Federation Press, 2001. 

    [22] Sydney Council. Review of environmental factors: green square to Ashmore Connector Road between Botany Road and Bowden Street, Alexandria[R]. 2017. 

    [23] Sydney Water Corporation. Review of environmental factors: green square stormwater drain[R]. 2014. 

    [24] THORPE A. Bringing plan-making back into planning: a reflection on Barangaroo and lessons from Part 3A, which provides special streamlined planning approval procedures for projects deemed by the minister to be of state state significance[J]. Architecture Australia, 2010, 4(99): 25-26. 

    [25] New South Wales. Department of Urban Planning. Plan first: review of plan making in NSW: white paper[R]. Sydney: 2001. 

    [26] 张勤 , 章建明 , 张京祥 , 等 . 追求善治与善政的统一——杭州“最多跑 一次”规划实施管理改革经验与启示 [J]. 城市规划 , 2018, 42(4): 9-17.

《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

7726910