张朝辉

Zhang Chaohui

关键词：城市更新；制度体系；日本；都市再生；选址优化规划

Keywords：City Renewal; Institutional System; Japan; Urban Regeneration; Location Optimization Plan

摘要：

城市更新是当前我国提升城市人居品质，推动城市高质量发展的重要战略抓手。目前以老旧小区改造为首的先行实践探索已广泛展开，为了更好地应对各类规划设计、利益协调等复杂的城市更新问题，并保证各项相关行动有依据、有激励、有保障，建设城市更新制度体系势在必行，而借鉴国际优质经验颇有裨益。日本经历了近20 年的都市再生发展进程，至今已形成一套具有较强借鉴意义的城市更新体系。本文梳理了日本都市再生的制度、主体和实践发展沿革，并解析日本都市再生的三大主体制度模块与细化实践模式，探讨日本都市再生体系对我国的启示。日本经验表明，基于完整性、动态化、精细化、人本化的制度建设与应用，高度配套的政策引导，以及多主体充分联结的运行模式是其更新实践取得优质效果的关键原因，也启示未来我国应积极构建城市更新的总体制度框架，探索分项细化的城市更新模式，开辟“区域特例+ 商业化”的中国城市更新道路，并谨慎考量我国在城市体量、自主性与规制性、人民利益等方面问题的特殊性对制度建设产生的影响。

Abstract：

Urban renewal is an important strategy to improve the quality of urban human settlements and promote high-quality urban development. At present, the practices and explorations led by the transformation of old residential areas have been widely carried out. In order to better deal with various plannings and designs, interest coordination and other complex urban renewal problems, and ensure that the actions of urban renewal have basis, incentive and guarantee, the construction of urban renewal system is imperative. Japan has experienced nearly 20 years of urban regeneration development process, and has formed a set of urban renewal system with strong reference significance. Based on this, this paper combs the evolution of the system, subject and practice of urban regeneration in Japan, analyzes three main system modules and detailed practice mode of urban regeneration in Japan, and discusses the enlightenment of Japan’s urban regeneration system to China. Japan’s experience shows that the key reasons for the high-quality effect of urban renewal practice are the system construction and application based on integrity, dynamic, refinement and humanism, highly supporting policy guidance, and the operation mode of multi-agent full connection. It also enlightens that China should actively build the overall system framework of urban renewal in the future, and explore the “sub detailed” urban renewal mode. We should open up the path of “regional special case + commercialization” for urban renewal in China, and carefully consider the impact of the particularity of China’s urban scale, autonomy and regulation, and people’s interests on the construction of desirable system.

张朝辉，中国社会科学院大学，硕士研究生。zhangchaohui555@163.com

• [1] 王丰龙, 刘云刚, 陈倩敏, 等. 范式沉浮——百年来西方城市规划理论体系的建构[J]. 国际城市规划, 2012, 27(1): 75-83.

  [2] CULLINGWORTH B, CAVES R W, CULLINGWORTH J B, et al.

  Planning in the USA: Policies, issues, and processes[M]. Routledge, 2013.

  [3] 于洋. 纽约市区划条例的百年流变（1916—2016）——以私有公共空间建设为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2016, 31(2): 98-109.

  [4] FLUCK T A. Euclid v. Ambler: a retrospective[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1986, 52(3): 326-337.

  [5] 薄力之. 美国区划法对于建设强度管控的措施与经验——以纽约为例[J]. 北京规划建设, 2017, 173(2): 34-43.

  [6] 孙骅声, 蔡建辉. 美国纽约市区划决议（1993 年修订本）的几个特点[J]. 国外城市规划, 1998(4): 41-42.

  [7] 王卉, 谭纵波, 刘健. 美国纽约市建筑高度控制方法探析[J]. 国际城市规划, 2016(1): 93-99.

  [8] 李强, 王珊. 纽约的分区制及其启示[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2005(5): 95-97.

  [9] 彭飞飞. 美国的城市区划法[J]. 国际城市规划, 2009, 24( 增刊1): 69-72.

  [10] 阳建强. 美国区划技术的发展（上）[J]. 城市规划, 1992(6): 49-52.

  [11] WEISS M A,WARD D, ZUNZ O. Density and intervention: New York’s planning traditions[M] // The landscape of modernity: essays on New York City, 1900-1940. Russell Sage Foundation, 1992: 46-75.

  [12] KOLNICK K A. Order before zoning: land use regulation in Los Angeles, 1880-1915[M]. University of Southern California, 2008.

  [13] WEISS M A. The rise of the community builders: the American real estate industry and urban land planning[M]. Beard Books, 2002.

  [14] FISCHLER R. The metropolitan dimension of early zoning: revisiting the 1916 New York City Ordinance[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1998, 64(2): 170-188.

  [15] 李恒. 美国区划发展历史研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2007.

  [16] HIRT S A. Zoned in the USA: the origins and implications of American land-use regulation[M]. Cornell University Press, 2015.

  [17] 王卉. 妨害视角下的城市土地用途控制探析——以美国为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2015, 30( 增刊1): 23-28.

  [18] WHITTEMORE A. The regulated city: the politics of land use regulation in Los Angeles, 1909-2009[M]. University of California, Los Angeles, 2010.

  [19] BASSETT E M. Zoning: the laws, administration, and court decisions during the first twenty years[M]. Russell Sage Foundation, 1940.

  [20] 周剑云, 黎淑翎, 戚冬瑾, 等.《 1961 纽约区划则例》立法目的及其实施路线[J]. 城市规划, 2020, 44(10): 102-113.

  [21] WHITTEMORE A H. Zoning Los Angeles: a brief history of four regimes[J]. Planning perspectives, 2012, 27(3): 393-415.

  [22] 戚冬瑾, 周剑云. 基于形态的条例——美国区划改革新趋势的启示[J]. 城市规划, 2013, 37(9): 67-75.

  [23] BURDETTE J T. Form-based codes: a cure for the cancer called Euclidean Zoning?[D]. Blacksburg, Virginia: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2004.

  [24] McDOUGAL III L L. Performance standards: a viable alternative to Euclidean zoning[J]. Tulane law review, 1972, 47: 255.

  [25] 黄明华, 赵阳, 高靖葆, 等. 规划与规则——对控制性详细规划发展方向的探讨[J]. 城市规划, 2020, 44(11): 52-57, 87.

  [26] 周剑云, 戚冬瑾. 从规划语言学层面再认识城市用地分类体系[J]. 城市规划, 2018, 42(10): 34-41.

  [27] 陈璐, 周剑云. 语言学视角下的规划、分区及分区代码研究[J/OL]. 城市规划, 2022[2022-04-24]. https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.scut.edu.cn/kcms/detail/11.2378.TU.20220421.1203.002.html.

  
  

• 收起