Tu Fan, Hu Siwen, Zhao Guochao

Keywords： Public Land Development Model; Industrial Land; Stock Land Revitalization; Land Price; The Netherlands

Abstract：

The purpose of this study is to analyze the background, characteristics, current situation and reform direction of the application of Dutch public land development model in industrial land development, to compare with China’s industrial land development, and to explore the enlightenment to the market-oriented reform of China’s industrial land policies. By literature analysis and comparative analysis, the study finds that the public land development model in Dutch industrial land development has played an active role in history; current reforms focus on the direction of industrial land revitalization, sustainable land development, and high quality of industrial properties and sites. The common characteristic between China and the Netherlands is that local government dominates the supply of industrial land; the difference is that the land price of industrial land in China is much lower than the cost, and the cost recovery cannot be realized. The study concludes that the directionsof industrial land policy reform in China should change the pricing method, promote the diversification and improve the quality of industrial properties, and link the supply of greenfield industrial land with the stock of industrial land.

Funds：

• [1] NEEDHAM B. Land policy in the Netherlands[J]. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 1997, 88(3): 291-296.

  [2] NEEDHAM B, LOUW E. Institutional economics and policies for changing land markets: the case of industrial estates in the Netherlands[J]. Journal of property research, 2006, 23(1): 75-90.

  [3] KRABBEN E, NEEDHAM B. Land readjustment for value capturing: a new planning tool for urban redevelopment[J]. Town planning review, 2008, 79(6): 651-672.

  [4] KRABBEN E, JACOBS H M. Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: reflections on the Dutch experience[J]. Land use policy, 2013, 30(1): 774-783.

  [5] NEEDHAM B. Dutch land use planning: planning and managing land-use in the Netherlands, the principles and the practice[M]. The Hague: SDU Publishers, 2007.

  [6] ALTERMAN R. National-level planning in democratic countries: an international comparison of city and regional policy-making[M]. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2001.

  [7] KRABBEN E, BUITELAAR E. Industrial  land and property markets: market processes, market institutions and market outcomes: the Dutch case[J]. European planning studies, 2011, 19(12): 2127-2146.

  [8] BUITELAAR E. Window on the Netherlands: cracks in the myth: challenges to land policy in the Netherlands[J]. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 2010, 101(3): 349-356.

  [9] GOLLAND A. Models for land assembly in the UK: a comparative analysis of other European approaches[M]. London: RICS foundation, 2003.

  [10] MACLENNAN D, ALISON M. The future of social housing: key economic questions[J]. Housing studies, 1997, 12(4): 531-547.

  [11] VROM (Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment). Meerjarenplan stadsver- nieuwing 1986-1990[R]. The Hague: VROM, 1985.

  [12] VROM (Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment). Meerjarenplan stadsver- nieuwing 1987-1991[R]. The Hague: VROM. 1986.

  [13] EZ (Ministry of Economic Affairs). Kwaliteit wint terrein: actie-plan herstructurering bedrijventerreinen[R]. The Hague: EZ, 2002.

  [14] EZ (Ministry of Economic Affairs). Actieplan bedrijventerreinen 2004-2008: samenwerken aan uit- voering[R]. The Hague: EZ, 2004.

  [15] PLOEGMAKERS H. Regenerating rundown areas. An assessment of the impact of planning policies on the industrial property market[M]. Groningen: In Planning, 2015.

  [16] EVERS D. The sustainable urbanization ladder: the first experiences with the last national policy on urbanization[R/OL]. (2014-09-15) [2018-10-7]. https://urbanplanningams.wordpress.com/2014/09/15/the-sustainableurbanization-ladder-the-first-experiences-with-the-last-national-policy-onurbanization/.

  [17] OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). The governance of land use in the Netherlands: the case of Amsterdam[M]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017: 168.

  [18] SIRKIN H L, ZINSER M, HOHNER D. Made in America, again: why manufacturing will return to the US[R]. Boston: Boston Consulting Group, 2011.

  [19] TU F, YU X F, RUAN J Q. Industrial land use efficiency under government intervention: evidence from Hangzhou, China[J]. Habitat international, 2014, 43: 1-10.