Luo Zhendong

Keywords： Historical Institutionalist; Planning History; Spatial Planning; Institution; Theoretical Innovation

Abstract：

Urban space is densely institutionalized, and urban planning history is the history of construction of urban institutions, then studying planning is effectively studying institutions. Historical institutionalist approaches offer a robust theoretical framework and a valuable set of conceptual and analytic tools for planning history study. Introducing Historical institutionalist into China will promote the theoretical innovation in spatial planning study, especially in the period of nowadays huge institutional change.

Funds：

• [1] 斯文·斯坦莫. 什么是历史制度主义[J]. 比较政治学研究, 2016(2): 70-92.

  [2] 米尔斯. 社会学的想象力[M]. 陈强, 张永强, 译. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2010.

  [3] 何俊志. 结构、历史与行为——历史制度主义的分析范式[J]. 国外社会科学, 2002(5): 25-33.

  [4] HALL P, TAYLOR R. Political science and the three new institutionalisms[J]. Political studies, 1996, 44(5): 936-957.

  [5] SORENSEN A. Taking path dependence seriously: an historical institutionalist research agenda in planning history[J]. Planning perspectives, 2015, 30(1): 17-38.

  [6] 安德烈·索伦森，徐南南. 安德烈·索伦森：历史制度主义和城市与规划研究[J]. 北京规划建设, 2018(4): 188-194.

  [7] D?BROWSKI M, LINGUA V. Introduction: historical institutionalist perspectives on European spatial planning[J]. Planning perspectives, 2018, 33(4): 499-505

  [8] 罗震东. 经验、规律与知识：新时期国际规划历史研究的任务[J]．国际城市规划, 2018(4): 1-3. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2018.136.

  [9] 张京祥, 罗震东. 中国当代城乡规划思潮[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2013.

  [10] LUO Z D, ZHU B Y. Local adjustment with path-dependence: the governance structure shift and spatial responding in Chinese third-front city since 1980s[J]. Looking at the world history of planning, 2018, 18(1): 461-469.

  [11] 侯丽, 孙睿. 地方规划决策制度的创新与演进：以上海和深圳的规划委员会制度为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2019(6): 87-93.