DOI: 10.19830/j.upi.2019.461
Exploration of Dutch Social Housing Sale Mechanism

Jiao Yixue

Keywords: Dutch Social Housing; Public Rental Housing; Sale Mechanism; Sale Mode; Social Integration

Abstract:

The Netherlands began to promote the sale of social housing from the late 1970s. During the long developing period, the government has strictly regulated the types and quantities of social housing for sale to ensure that the total amount of social housing is basically stable and can meet the rental requirements of low-income families. This paper focuses on the background and purpose of the selling of social housing in the Netherlands, the selling objects and conditions , the selling approaches, etc., and analyzes the effectiveness and risks of social housing for sale in the case of Amsterdam. This paper aims at providing useful suggestions for Chinese affordable housing development and management.


Funds:

Brief Info of Author(s):

References:
  • [1] 重庆网络问政平台. 关于重庆公租房出售问题[EB/OL]. [2019-05-05]. http://cqwz.cqnews.net/ask/askDetail?id=276369

    [2] VAN KEMPEN R, PRIEMUS H. Revolution of social housing in the Netherlands: possible effects of new housing policies[J]. Urban studies, 2014, 39(2): 237-253.

    [3] Aedes, Facts and Figures, 2012[EB/OL]. [2013-09-12]. http://www.aedes.nl.

    [4] OUWEHAND A, DAALEN G V. Dutch housing associations–a model for social housing[M]. DUP Satellite, 2002.

    [5] WHITEHEAD C, SCANLON K. Social housing in Europe[M]. London School of Economics and Political Science, 2007.

    [6] Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations. Figures on Housing and Building(2016)[EB/OL]. [2016-04-11]. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2016/04/11/cijfers-over-wonen-en-bouwen-2016.

    [7] OpMaat. Corporaties verkochten in 2013 beter dan de markt[EB/OL]. [2014-05-30]. http://www.opmaat.nl/uploads/media/Verkopen_corporaties_in_2013.pdf.

    [8] Government of the Netherlands. de MG 2013-02 Verkoopregels Corporatiewoningen[EB/OL]. [2013-02-04]. http://www.government.nl/.

    [9] ELSINGA M, STEPHENS M, KNORR T-S. The privatisation of social housing: three different pathways[C] // SCANLON K, WHITEHEAD C, FERNáNDEZ A M. Social Housing in Europe. LSE London, 2008.

    [10] Amsterdamse Federatie van Woningcorporaties. Jaarboek 2012[EB/OL]. [2013-05-21].http://www.afwc.nl/uploads/tx_news/AFWC2012.pdf.

    [11] PAPA O, BOSCH N, KET M. De effecten van verkoop van sociale huurwoingen[C]. SEV Rotterdam, 2002.

    [12] ZIJLSTRA S. Mixing Dutch neighborhoods through the sale of social housing[C]. ENHR conference, Toulouse, 2011

    [13] CFV. Sectorbeeld (2013) [EB/OL]. [2014-03-20]. http://www.cfv.nl/.

    [14] ZIJLSTRA S. Choosing tenure, is that a real choice?[C] // ENHR conference changing housing markets: integration and segmentation conference paper. Prague, 2009.

    [15] Iamsterdam. Renting in the social sector in the Amsterdam Area[EB/OL]. [2019-10-21]. https://www.iamsterdam.com/en/living/everyday-essentials/housing/rental-property.

    [16] 周静, 姜鹏. 荷兰社会住房体系近期发展变化及对我国的启示[J]. 北京规划建设, 2012(5): 104-107.

    [17] BOTERMAN W R, GENT VAN W P C. Housing liberalisation and gentrification: the social effects of tenure conversions in Amsterdam[J]. Journal of economic and social geography, 2014(4): 140-160.

    [18] 赵展慧. 托起两亿人的安居梦(壮丽70 年 奋斗新时代)——我国住房保障体系建设述评(上)[N]. 人民日报, 2019-08-17(01).

    [19] 刘玉亭, 邱君丽. 企业主义视角下大城市保障房建设的策略选择及其社会空间后果[J]. 人文地理, 2018(4): 52-59.


TOP 10