Tang Shan, Li Ze, Wang Kailai, Cui Jianqiang

Keywords： Sino-Foreign Cooperative University; Embeddedness; International Branch Campus; Transnational Space; Spatial Characteristics

Abstract：

Driven by the internationalization of higher education, the number of international branch campus is increasing rapidly. By setting up international branch campus in the form of sino-foreign cooperative partnership, China has founded a special transnational educational entity that called Sino-foreign cooperative university. This paper systematically analyses sino-foreign cooperative universities’ embedded characteristics, studies their development status and spatial embedded mechanism. In addition, this paper takes four typical sino-foreign cooperative universities for example, analyzes the spatial characteristics of these campuses using the paradigm of “global integration-local responsiveness”, and studies the influence of the internal and external networks on the campus space under the influence of global integration and local responsiveness from four aspects: the transplantation of teaching mode, the integration of campus culture, the interaction of functional organization and the connection of gown and town, so as to provide reference for the development of higher education globalization.

Funds：

• [1] KNIGHT J. Education hubs: a fad, a brand, an innovation?[J]. Journal of studies in international education, 2011, 15(3): 221-240.

  [2] KOSMüTZKY A, PUTTY R. Transcending borders and traversing boundaries–a systematic review of the literature on transnational and offshore, cross-border and borderless higher education[J]. Journal of studies in international education, 2016, 20(1): 8-33.

  [3] VERBIK L. The international branch campus: models and trends[J]. International higher education, 2014, 12(2): 14-15.

  [4] Cross-Border Educational Research Team. Branch campus listing (Updated January 20, 2017) [EB/OL]. [2019-01-20]. http://cbert.org/resources-data/branch-campus/.

  [5] KINSER K, LANE J E. International branch campuses: evolution of a phenomenon[J]. International higher education, 2016(86): 6-8.

  [6] JACKSON P, CRANG P, DWYER C. Transnational spaces[M]. Routledge, 2004.

  [7] 王立, 薛德升. 世界城市跨国空间形成发展过程比较——基于柏林和广州的实证[J]. 城市规划, 2018, 42(4): 44-52, 118.

  [8] 刘亚玲. 场域嵌入：乡村传统文化发展的认识论和方法论研究[J]. 图书馆, 2018(9): 5-9.

  [9] 卡尔·波兰尼. 大转型：我们时代的经济与政治起源[M]. 冯刚, 刘阳, 译. 杭州: 浙江人民出版社, 2007: 15.

  [10] HESS M. “Spatial” relationships? towards a conceptualization of embeddedness[J]. Progress in human geography, 2004, 28(2): 165-186.

  [11] BARTLETT C A, GHOSHAL S. Managing across borders: the transnational solution[M]. Boston: Harvard Business School, 1989.

  [12] HEALEY N M. The optimal global integration–local responsiveness tradeoff for an international branch campus[J]. Research in higher education, 2018, 59(5): 623-649.

  [13] SHAMS F, HUISMAN J. Managing offshore branch campuses: an analytical framework for institutional strategies[J]. Journal of studies in international education, 2011, 16(2): 106-127.

  [14] 顾美玲. 中外合作办学的经验与启示——以宁波诺丁汉大学和西交利物浦大学为例[J]. 世界教育信息, 2012, 25(17): 64-68.

  [15] 王思斌. 中国社会工作的嵌入性发展[J]. 社会科学战线, 2011(2): 206-222.

  [16] MEYER KE , MUDAMBI R, NARULA R. Multinational enterprises and local contexts: the opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness[J]. Journal of management studies, 2011(11): 236-248.

  [17] 宋峻, 周玉辉. 开放、融合、绿色的校园建筑——西交利物浦大学科研楼[J]. 动感( 生态城市与绿色建筑), 2012(1): 76-85.

  [18] 时惠来, 林中杰.“上善若水”——昆山杜克大学生态景观设计[J]. 建筑学报, 2018(3): 94-100.

  [19] 刘宁. 大学园区对城市发展的影响研究[D]. 华东师范大学, 2014.

  [20] FENG Y . University of Nottingham Ningbo China and Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University: globalization of higher education in China[J]. Higher education, 2013, 65(4): 471-485.

  [21] 郑德高, 袁海琴. 校区、园区、社区：三区融合的城市创新空间研究[J]. 国际城市规划, 2017, 32(4): 67-75. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2016.158.

  [22] 刘铮, 王世福, 莫浙娟. 校城一体理念下新城式大学城规划的借鉴与反思：以比利时新鲁汶大学城为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2017(6): 112-119. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2016.395.

  [23] 汪德根, 杜金莹. 城市双修理念下大学校园开放的困境与突破——以苏州大学为例[J]. 中国名城, 2018(7): 57-64.