DOI: 10.19830/j.upi.2021.068
Architectural Project and the Agency of Representation: The Case of Nowa Huta, Poland

Written by ?ukasz Stanek, Translated by Yang Shan

Keywords: The Production of Space; The Agency of Representation; Architectural Project; Poland; Socialist City

Abstract:

On the basis of Lefebvre’s doctrine, this article explores the agency of representation in the production of space. As Lefebvre stresses, representations are a necessary part of the processes of space production. Representations result from architectural labour and inhabitants’ creation. Although the competition and negotiation between different representations lead to an expenditure of architectural labour in conclusion, they promote the production of space in reality. Using Nowa Huta, the “first socialist city in Poland”, as a case, this article discusses how the contested representations of space intervened in the dynamics of space production in the post-socialist period after 1989. Two specific issues, “the housing question in Nowa Huta” and “alley of roses”, are chosen as the specific reference points to develop the discussion.

Funds:

Brief Info of Author(s):

References:
  • [1] LEFEBVRE H. The production of space[M]. NICHOLSON-SMITH D, trans. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991. 

     [2] STANEK ?. Henri Lefebvre on space. architecture, urban research, and the production of theory[M]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2011. 

    [3] STANEK ?. Architecture as space, again? notes on the “Spatial Turn”[J]. Le journal speciale’Z, 2012(4): 48-53. 

    [4] LEFEBVRE H. Architecture et sciences sociales seminaire annuel 22-26 juin, 1972[M] // STURGE-MOORE L, ed. Port Grimaud. Compte rendu des communications et des interventions. Paris: Centre de recherche sur l’habitat, 1972: 4. 

    [5] JACOBS J M. The city unbound: qualitative approaches to the city[J]. Urban studies, 1993, 30(4/5): 827-848. 

    [6] HOLSTON J. The modernist city: anthropological critique of Brasilia[M]. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1989. 

    [7] AWAN N, TILL J, SCHNEIDER T. Spatial agency: other ways of doing architecture[M]. London: Routledge, 2011. 

    [8] STANEK ?. A Manuscript found in Saragossa: toward an architecture[M] // LEFEBVRE H. Toward an architecture of enjoyment. BONONNO R, trans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2014: xi-lxi. 

     [9] IRION I, SIEVERTS T. Neue St?dte. experimentierfelder der moderne[M]. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1991. 

    [10] JUCHNOWICZ S. Nowa Huta, a relict of the past or a chance for Cracow[Z]. IX International Biennale of Architecture, Kraków, 2002. 

    [11] BUKOWSKI A. The diagnosis of social situation in Nowa Huta in the context of sociotherapy centers establishing[C]. 5th Transnational Meeting: Demos – improving local democracy, Kraków, 2003. 

    [12] SIEMIENSKA R. Nowe ?ycie w nowym mie?cie[M]. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna. 1969. 

    [13] PTASZYCKI T. Fundamenty nowego miasta[J]. Miasto, 1952, 15 (1/III): 8-11. 

    [14] STENNING A. Representing transformations/transforming representations: remaking life and work in Nowa Huta, Poland[EB/OL]. [2001-03-07]. www. nowahuta.info. 

    [15] STANEK ?. Simulation or hospitality: beyond the crisis of representation in Nowa Huta[M] // FRERS L, MEIER L, eds. Visual and material performances in the city. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007: 135-153. 

    [16] KARNASIEWICZ J. Nowa Huta: okruchy ?ycia i meandry historii[M]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa S?owaków w Polsce, 2003. 

    [17] KARSZNIA N. Powstanie parafii i budowa ko?cio?a Matki Bo?ej Cz?stochowskiej w Nowej Hucie[M]. Kraków: Sponsor, 1994: 35. 

    [18] KARSZNIA N. ?ycie rodzinne w Nowej Hucie. Obserwacje i rozwi?zania[M]. Kraków: Sponsor, 1997: 12. 

    [19] OSTROWSKI W. Kszta?towanie przestrzenne miasta socjalistycznego’. Miasto, 1952, 1(15)(1/III): 1–4. 

    [20] WEREKSIEJ F Z. Jubileuszowe obrachunki[J]. WTK Tygodnik Katolicki, 1976(35): 1, 8. 

    [21] LEFEBVRE H. Les nouveaux ensembles urbains (un cas concret: Lacq– Mourenx et les problemes urbains de la nouvelle classe ouvriere)[J]. La Revue fran?aise de sociologie, 1960, 1 (1/2): 186-201. 

    [22] STENNING A, SMITH A, ROCHOVSKà A et al. Domesticating neoliberalism: spaces of economic practice and social reproduction in postsocialist cities[M]. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010: 9-10. 

    [23] LEFEBVRE H. Critique of everyday life volume 1: introduction[M]. New York: Verso, 2008. 

    [24] LEFEBVRE H. Critique of everyday life volume 2. foundations for a sociology of the everyday[M]. New York: Verso, 2002. 

    [25] LEFEBVRE H. Critique of everyday life volume 3. from modernity to modernism (towards a metaphilosophy of daily life) [M]. New York: Verso, 2006. 

    [26] KOZLOWSKI D. Less Ideology – More Geometry[Z]. IX International Biennale of Architecture, 2002: 14-23. 

    [27] PTASZYCKI T, eds. Nowa Huta[M]. Kraków: Miastoprojekt, 1959. [28] MIEZIAN M. Nowa Huta. socjalistyczna w formie, fascynuj?ca w tre?ci[M]. Kraków: Bezdro?a, 2004: 85-86.

TOP 10