DOI: 10.19830/j.upi.2019.001
Research on the Social Housing Community Planning from the Perspective of Spatial-Social Relation: Reflection on Inclusionary Housing Programs in the United States

Gu Yuanyuan, Xing Zhong, Chen Zilong, Qiao Xin, Jin Qiao

Keywords: Spatial-Social Relation; Social Housing; Inclusionary Housing Program; Inclusive Neighborhood; Social Incorporation

Abstract:

How to integrate social housing and public rental housing into urban housing system, to avoid social problems derided with the construction of low-income areas, draws a lot of attentions from both academy and society. Taking the “space-society” correlation and its influence on the reproduction of social relations as the main thread, the paper tends to detect the concept and connotation of inclusionary housing programs in the United States from the perspective of “space-society” relationship. The paper tends to comb various policies with the coexistence of mandatory and flexible guarantee incentives and spatial measures for all parties to jointly promote the construction of inclusive housing program. Furtherly, remarkable reflections are concluded as following: incorporate affordable housing into city neighborhoods indiscriminatingly, benefit all the residents including the low-income groups from the spatial network, and achieve social harmony by spatial integration, catalyze reproduction of positive social relationship.

Funds:

Brief Info of Author(s):

References:
  • [1] 吴宾 , 王亚菲 . 论公共住房空间失配的演化机理及其社会影响 [J]. 山东农业大学学报 ( 社会科学版 ), 2015, 17(2): 7-11.

    [2] 赵聚军 . 保障房空间布局失衡与中国大城市居住隔离现象的萌发中国行政管理 , 2014, (7): 60-63, 68.

    [3] 邵祁峰 . 保障性住区的空间生产与社会再造 [D]. 南京 : 南京大学2013.

    [4] 吴宇哲 , 王薇 . 住房保障与城市经济增长协同机制研究 [J]. 河海大学学报 ( 哲学社会科学版 ), 2016,18(6): 27-33, 95.

    [5] 高鉴国 . 新马克思主义城市理论 [M]. 商务印书馆 , 2006.

    [6] 张京祥 , 陈浩 . 南京市典型保障性住区的社会空间绩效研究——空间生产的视角 [J]. 现代城市研究 , 2012, 27(6): 66-71.

    [7] 洪亮平 , 王旭 . 美国保障性住房政策变迁及其启示 [J]. 城市发展研究2013, 20(6): 129-134.

    [8] 宋伟轩 . 大城市保障性住房空间布局的社会问题与治理途径 [J]. 城市发展研究 , 2011, 18(8): 103-108.

    [9] 徐苗 , 马雪雯 . 基于社会融合视角的保障性住房研究评述及启示 [部人居环境学刊 , 2015(5): 93-99.

    [10] 杨碧波 . 重庆保障房社区非正规就业群体职住空间失配研究 [D]. 重庆重庆大学 , 2017.

    [11] 王承慧 , 章毓婷 . 大型保障房社区公共设施供给机制优化研究 [J]. 城市规划学刊 , 2017(2): 96-103.

    [12] 谢义维 . 主要发达国家住房保障制度及中国的实践研究 [D]. 长春林大学 , 2014.

    [13] 陈玉 . 普鲁伊特·艾格社区的生与死——一个美国公共住房案例的解读 [J]. 规划师 , 2013, 29(4): 105-110.

    [14] Inclusionary housing in California: 30 years of innovation[R]. California Coalition for Rural Housing and Non-profit Housing Association Northern California, 2003: 7.

    [15] WIENER R J, BARTON S E. The underpinnings of inclusionary housing in California: current practice and emerging market and legal challenges Journal of housing & the built environment, 2014, 29(3): 403-422.

    [16] SCHWARTZ A F. Housing policy in the United States[M]. Routledge, 2010

    [17] 张娟 . 美国包容性区划对我国保障性住房建设的启示 [J]. 城市规划2011, 35(9): 41-46.

    [18] 易成栋 , 黄友琴 , 李玉瑶 . 包容性住房政策 :理论思辨与国际评估中国房地产 , 2019(33): 42-49. 

    [19] RUSK D. Nine lessons for inclusionary zoning keynote remarks of David Rusk to the National Inclusionary Housing Conference[R]. Washington DC, 2005: 3. 

    [20] The New York City Council. The inclusionary housing text amendment update. July 29, 2009[EB/OL]. [2020-05-21]. http://www.nyc.gov/html/html/inclusionary_housing/index.shtml.

    [21] 黄潇仪 , 吴晓 . 基于贫困疏解视角的美国保障性住房政策审视 [J]. 现代城市研究 , 2012, 27(11): 71-79.

    [22] LEFEBVRE H, ELDEN S, MOORE G. Rhythm analysis: space, time everyday life[M]. Continuum, 2004.

    [23] HARVEY D. The urban experience[M]. B. Blackwell, 1989.

    [24] REGUS L, SLOVIN S, VINIT M. Can inclusionary zoning be an effective efficient housing policy[J]. Journal of urban affairs, 2010(2): 229-252.

    [25] FULTON W, SHIGLEY P. California planning[M]. 3rd ed. Point Arena California: Solano Press Books, 2005: 135.

    [26] 柴康妮 . 美国当前住房保障政策面临问题与解决方案——以马萨诸塞州为例 [J]. 中国房地产 , 2017, 36(7): 41-49.

    [27] LEONARD H J. Managing Oregon’s growth, the politics of development planning[M]. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation, 1985.

    [28] ROBERT B W, CATHERINE G C. Inclusionary zoning: pros and cons[M].HIGGINS B. California inclusionary housing reader. Institute for Local

    Government, 2003.

    [29] PYATOK M. Inclusionary housing: some doubts[M] // HIGGINS B. California Inclusionary Housing Reader. Institute for Local Self Government, 2003.

    [30] DIAGNE A F, KURBAN H, SCHMUTZ B. Are inclusionary housing programs color-blind? the case of Montgomery County MPDU Program[J].  Journal of housing economics, 2018, 40: 6-24. 

    [31] RUCKER L, SCHNEIDER A. Inclusionary zoning. market-financed affordable housing–could Vienna benefit from this American approach?[J] . Der Offentliche Sektor, 2019, 45(1): 35-48.  

    [32] CAWLEY D G. Law and inclusive urban development: lessons from Chile’s enabling markets housing policy regime[J]. The American journal of comparative law, 2019, 67(3): 587-636.

    [33] MOUSSE M, WINODLEY T, RAVENTON N, et al. Mixed use planning: who can afford it?[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2018, 84(1): 7-20. 

    [34] STEIN S. Progress for whom, toward what? progressive politics and New York City’ s mandatory inclusive housing[J]. Journal of urban affairs, 2018, 40(6): 770-781.

    [35] HAMILTON E. Inclusionary zoning hurts more than it helps[R]. Fairfax: Mercatus Center at George Mason University, 2019: 9.

    [36] WASHINGTON E. Inclusionary zoning and housing market outcomes[J]. Mercatus research paper, 2019: 9.

    [37] CHEN Z, HUANG Y, HUANG X. Public support for inclusionary housing in urban China[J]. International journal of housing policy, 2019, 19(4): 457-482.

    [38] 王薇 . 保障房供给的城市包容性增长机理与效应研究 [D]. 杭州 : 浙江大学 , 2019.

    [39] 陈思圆 . 保障性住房供给对不同收入阶层居民消费的影响研究 [D]. 上海 : 华东师范大学 , 2018.

    [40] NZAU B, TRILLO C. Affordable housing provision in informal settlements through land value capture and inclusionary housing[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(15): 5975.


TOP 10