Wan Chengwei, Yu Yang

Keywords： Public Goods; Polycentric Governance; Urban Village; Renewal Model; Shuiwei Village in Shenzhen

Abstract：

The existing urban village renewal model is difficult to meet the diversified needs of megacity socio-economic transformation and development, which has become a key factor in limiting the effects of renewal and transformation. Based on the perspective of polycentric governance theory, this paper analyzes the shortcomings of the traditional renewal model. After defining the four main bodies (government, market, villagers, migrants) and their roles in the renewal of urban villages, it suggests that the urban village renewal and reconstruction in China shall establish a polycentric governance schema with equalized collaboration and inclusion of migrants. Then, through the case study of Shuiwei Village in Shenzhen, it is found that the construction of public goods (interests) is an important catalyst for polycentric governance. In addition, the renewal strategy guided by “talent housing” supply as a low-cost affordable housing supply solution in large cities, has explored a new path of local governance for the nation. On this basis, the paper puts forward the path of multi-center governance renewal of urban villages, which includes: changing government affairs from management to governance; actively integrating the goal of enterprise development into the one of public policy and conforming to the law of market; strengthening the community cultivation and promoting the ability of autonomy; offering the “urban right” to the alien population to promote the development of civilization; using the urban public products (benefits) to promote the “compromise” of all parties; seeking for the relative optimal results of the collective in the renewal process; and promoting negotiation and cooperation.

Funds：

• [1] 张磊 . “新常态”下城市更新治理模式比较与转型路径 [J]. 城市发展研

  究 , 2015, 22(12): 57-62.

  [2] 叶裕民 . 特大城市包容性城中村改造理论架构与机制创新——来自北京和广州的考察与思考 [J]. 城市规划 , 2015, 39(8): 9-23.

  [3] 罗宇 . 2009-2019 城市更新十年展望与回顾 [R]. 2019.

  [4] 陈颖颖 . 我国城中村改造实践模式比较 [J]. 中国行政管理 , 2012(08): 127-128.

  [5] 郑思齐 , 任荣荣 .“城中村”住房问题 ：现状分析与政策建设 [M] //满燕云，隆国强，景娟 . 中国低收入住房 ：现状及政策设计 . 北京 : 

  中国商务印书馆 , 2011: 3-16.

  [6] 陈清鋆 . 城中村改造开发模式对比研究 [J]. 现代城市研究 , 2012, 27(3): 60-63.

  [7] 刘红 , 张洪雨 , 王娟 . 多中心治理理论视角下的村改居社区治理研究 [J]. 理论与改革 , 2018(5): 153-162.

  [8] 杨志军 . 多中心协同治理模式的内涵阐析 [J]. 四川行政学院学报 , 2010 (4): 29-32.

  [9] 谭禹 . 多中心治理理论与保障性住房的多元供给 [J]. 城市问题 , 2012(12): 63-67.

  [10] 王志刚 . 多中心治理理论的起源、发展与演变 [J]. 常熟理工学院学报 , 2010, 24(3): 33-35.

  [11] 文森特·奥斯特罗姆 , 帕克斯 , 惠特克 . 公共服务的制度建构 [M]. 上海 : 三联书店 , 2000.

  [12] 十九届四中全会 , 中国共产党第十九届中央委员会第四次全体会议公报 [R]. 北京 : 人民出版社 , 2019.

  [13] 何力武 , 刘骥 . 城中村改造 : 历史起源及行为者分析 [J]. 中国行政管理 , 2017(3): 78-82. 

  [14] 蓝宇蕴 , 蓝燕霞 . 关于政府主导城中村改造的探析——以广州城中村改造为例 [J]. 城市观察 , 2010(5): 110-118.

  [15] 章平 , 唐娟 . 城中村城市化过程中的多中心复合治理模式构建——以深圳市宝安区城中村城市管理为例 [J]. 生态经济 , 2015, 31(4): 188-191.