Zhang Shuhai, Li Dingling

Keywords： The Netherlands; Environment and Planning Act; Multiple Acts Integration; Central and Local Power Distribution; Public Participation

Abstract：

With the rapid advancement of the “multiple plans integration” reform, China’s planning system has achieved unity in terms of technology and management institutions. However, laws and regulations are still under multiple management entities. Since the Netherlands has gone through the “great unification” for its space laws, this paper researches the Dutch “Environment and Planning Act” and synthesizes its best practices in three aspects: “multiple acts integration”, central and local power distribution, information disclosure and public participation. Based on that, this paper then explores the enlightenments for China’s planning act system integration and comes up with somes primary results. To construct a unified planning act system, a model like “trunk + special items” should be adopted; to establish a reasonable distribution of central and local power, centralization and decentralization should be balanced; to construct a modest public participation mechanism, information disclosure should be further strengthened.

Funds：

• [1] 苏涵 , 陈皓 . “多规合一”的本质及其编制要点探析 [J]. 规划师 , 2015, 31(2): 57-62. 

  [2] 王向东 , 龚健 . “多规合一”视角下的中国规划体系重构 [J]. 城市规划 学刊 , 2016(2): 88-95. 

  [3] 王向东 , 刘卫东 . 中国空间规划体系：现状、问题与重构 [J]. 经济地理 , 2012, 32(5): 7-15. 

  [4] 孙雯 . 国外发展规划立法例研究及对我国立法的启示 [J]. 南京社会科 学 , 2010(7): 91-97. 

  [5] 谢英挺, 王伟. 从“多规合一”到空间规划体系重构[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2015(3): 15-21. 

  [6] 严金明 , 迪力沙提·亚库甫 , 张东昇 . 国土空间规划法的立法逻辑与 立法框架 [J]. 资源科学 , 2019, 41(9): 1600-1609. 

  [7] 李林林, 靳相木, 吴次芳. 国土空间规划立法的逻辑路径与基本问题[J]. 中国土地科学 , 2019, 33(1): 1-8. 

  [8] 谭纵波 , 高浩歌 . 日本国土利用规划概观 [J]. 国际城市规划 , 2018, 33(6): 1-12. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2018.146. 

  [9] 徐瑾 , 顾朝林 . 英格兰城市规划体系改革新动态 [J]. 国际城市规划 , 2015, 30(3): 78-83. 

  [10] 罗超 , 王国恩 , 孙靓雯 . 从土地利用规划到空间规划 ：英国规划体系 的演进[J]. 国际城市规划, 2017, 32(4): 90-97. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2016.169. 

  [11] 强真 . 德国国土空间规划法律法规体系及借鉴 [J]. 中国土地 , 2019(8): 47-49. 

  [12] 郑明媚 , 黎韶光 , 荣西武 , 等 . 美国城市发展与规划历程对我国的借鉴 与启示 [J]. 城市发展研究 , 2010, 17(10): 67-71. 

  [13] 王玉波 , 唐莹 . 国外土地利用规划发展与借鉴 [J]. 人文地理 , 2010, 25(3): 24-28. 

  [14] 孙雯 . 国外发展规划立法例研究及对我国立法的启示 [J]. 南京社会科 学 , 2010(7): 91-97. 

  [15] 魏后凯 . 荷兰国土规划与规划政策 [J]. 地理学与国土研究 , 1994(3): 54- 60. 

  [16] NEEDHAM B. The new Dutch spatial planning act: continuity and change in the way in which the Dutch regulate the practice of spatial planning[J]. Planning practice and research, 2005, 20(3): 327-340. 

  [17] 张书海 , 冯长春 , 刘长青 . 荷兰空间规划体系及其新动向 [J]. 国际城市 规划 , 2014, 29(5): 89-94. 

  [18] 赵力 . 论荷兰《空间规划法》规划制定权力的垂直分配与纠纷解决 [J]. 国际城市规划 , 2018, 33(4): 124-131. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2017.124. 

  [19] KORTHALS A. W. K. Planning reform beyond planning: the debate on an integrated environment and planning act in the Netherlands[J]. Planning practice and research, 2016, 31(4): 420-434. 

  [20] 周静 , 沈迟 . 荷兰空间规划体系的改革及启示 [J]. 国际城市规划 , 2017, 32(3): 113-121. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2016.345. 

  [21] HENDRIKS F., TOPS P. Between democracy and efficiency: trends in local goverment reform in the Netherlands and Germany[J]. Public administration, 2010, 77(1): 133-153. [22] FLEURKE F, HULST R. A contingency approach to decentralization[J]. Public organization review, 2006, 6(1): 37-56. 

  [23] 生青杰 . 公众参与原则与我国城市规划立法的完善 [J]. 城市发展研究 , 2006(4): 109-113. 

  [24] BUITELAAR E, SOREL N. Between the rule of law and the quest for control: legal certainty in the Dutch planning system[J]. Land use policy, 2010, 27(3): 983-989. 

  [25] DE GRAAF K J, PLATJOUW F M, TOLSMA H D. The future Dutch environment and planning act in light of the ecosystem approach[J]. Ecosystem services, 2018, 29: 306-315. 

  [26] GRAAF K J DE, TOLSMA H D. The future environment and planning act and the impact of the crisis and recovery act: country report the Netherlands[J]. Iucn academy of environmental law ejournal, 2015, 6: 293-302. 

  [27] 蔡玉梅, 谢俊奇, 赵言文, 等. 2000年以来中国土地利用规划研究综述[J]. 中国土地科学 , 2006(6): 56-61. [28] 孙施文, 朱婷文. 推进公众参与城市规划的制度建设[J]. 现代城市研究, 2010, 25(5): 17-20.