Du Yan, Liang Zhitong, Zhao Qian

Keywords： Field; Wholeness; Space; Mechanism; Ontology; Urban Field

Abstract：

“Field” is an area of active forces which can be used to understand and define the interaction of forces between objects. It first appeared in physics as a scientific term and has been widely used in the study of the interaction mechanism of objects under noncontact condition. This paper sorts through the scientific concept and various description models of field from the two aspects of definition of object existence and analysis of evolution mechanism, summarizes and refines the characteristics and significance of field, and makes it clear that it has ontological and methodological potential in formally describing the holistic characteristics and summation effect between objects. In addition, this paper points out the main steps of the application of field in space research, and explains it in details from the aspects of ontology construction, relational space structure and operation mechanism, mapping method and practical operation. The further application and development of the concept of field are also prospected: as a tool for analyzing psychological cognition, providing a perspective for urban planning and design, and explaining the dynamic system of cultural landscape.

Funds：

• [1] 赵仲牧 . 物理场论对哲学思考的提示 [J]. 思想战线 , 2000(5): 1-6. 

  [2] McMULLIN E. The origins of the field concept in physics[J]. Physics in perspective, 2002, 4(1): 13-39. 

  [3] BARNETT R. Emergence in landscape architecture[M]. London and New York: Routledge, 2013: 67-69. 

  [4] RUMMEL R J. Understanding conflict and war (Vol. 1): the dynamic psychological field[M]. New York: Halsted Press, 1975-1981: 33-35.

  [5] LEWIN K. Field theory and experiment in social psychology: concepts and methods[J]. American journal of sociology, 1939, 44(6): 868-896. 

  [6] LEWIN K, CARTWRIGHT D, eds. Field theory in social science[M]. New York: Harper & Row, 1951: 240. 

  [7] 刘海龙 . 当代媒介场研究导论 [J]. 国际新闻界 , 2005(2): 53-59, 75. 

  [8] MARTIN J L. What is field theory?[J]. American journal of sociology, 2003, 109(1): 1-49. [9] KLUTTZ D N, FLIGSTEIN N. Varieties of sociological field theory[M] // ABRUTYN S. Handbook of contemporary sociological theory. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, 2016: 185-204. 

  [10] WACQUANT L J D. Towards a reflexive sociology: a workshop with Pierre Bourdieu[J]. Sociological theory, 1989: 26-63. 

  [11] 罗德尼·本森 , 韩纲 . 比较语境中的场域理论: 媒介研究的新范式 [J]. 新闻与传播研究 , 2003(1): 2-23, 93. 

  [12] 皮埃尔·布迪厄 , 华康德 . 实践与反思：反思社会学导引 [M]. 李猛 , 李康 , 译 . 北京 : 中央编译出版社 , 2004: 155. 

  [13] 郑天艺 . 布尔迪厄的社会学研究 [J]. 管理观察 , 2018(13): 66-68. 

  [14] 邹锐 . 生态场理论及生态场特性 [J]. 生态学杂志 , 1995, 14(1): 49-53. 

  [15] 王根轩 . 生态场理论 [J]. 地球科学进展 , 1993(6): 76-78.

  [16] WU H I, SHARPE P J H, WALKER J, et al. Ecological field theory: a spatial analysis of resource interference among plants[J]. Ecological modelling, 1985, 29(1-4): 215-243. 

  [17] 王亚秋 , 王德利 . 改进的植物生态场模型与实例分析 [J]. 生态学报 , 2005(11): 63-69. 

  [18] 王德利 . 植物生态场导论 [M]. 长春 : 吉林科学技术出版社 , 1994: 38, 46. 

  [19] THOM D, RAMMER W, SEIDL R. The impact of future forest dynamics on climate: interactive effects of changing vegetation and disturbance regimes[J]. Ecological monographs, 2017, 87(4): 665-684. 

  [20] THOM D, RAMMER W, GARSTENAUER R, et al. Legacies of past land use have a stronger effect on forest carbon exchange than future climate change in a temperate forest landscape[J]. Biogeosciences, 2018, 15(18): 5699- 5713. 

  [21] SEIDL R, RAMMER W, SCHELLER R M, et al. An individual-based process model to simulate landscape-scale forest ecosystem dynamics[J]. Ecological modelling, 2012, 231: 87-100. 

  [22] FARINA A, BELGRANO A. The eco-field hypothesis: toward a cognitive landscape[J]. Landscape ecology, 2006, 21(1): 5-17. 

  [23] SáNCHEZ-GARCíA F J, MACHADO V, GALIáN J, et al. Application of the eco-field and general theory of resources to bark beetles: beyond the niche construction theory[J]. Biosemiotics, 2017, 10(1): 57-73. 

  [24] SAVAGE M. The lost urban sociology of Pierre Bourdieu[J]. The new Blackwell companion to the city, 2011: 511-520. 

  [25] 斯坦·艾伦 , 吴洪德 . 知不可绘而绘之·论标记符号 [J]. 时代建筑 , 2015(2): 124-129. 

  [26] ALLEN S, WILKE B, eds. Stan Allen: Four projects[M]. San Francisco: Applied Research and Design Publishing, 2017: 24. 

  [27] ALLEN S. From object to field[J]. Architecture design, 1997, 67(3): 24-31. 

  [28] 赵榕 . 从对象到场域——读斯坦·艾伦《场域状态》[J]. 建筑师 , 2005(1): 79-85. 

  [29] 童淑媛 , 张楠 . “场域状态”在后都市化城市建设中的体现——以广州为例 [J]. 中外建筑 , 2005(5): 39-42. 

  [30] 斯坦·艾伦 . 点＋线——关于城市的图解与设计 [M]. 任浩 , 译 . 北京 : 中国建筑工业出版社 , 2006: 98. 

  [31] ALLEN S. Practice: architecture, technique and representation[M]. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009: 212-219. 

  [32] 安军, 郭贵春. 科学隐喻的认知结构与运作机制[J]. 科学技术与辩证法, 2008(5): 43-48. 

  [33] BURNES B, COOKE B. Kurt Lewin’s field theory: a review and re-evaluation[J]. International journal of management reviews, 2013, 15(4): 408- 425. 

  [34] 石楠 . 城乡规划学学科研究与规划知识体系 [J]. 城市规划 , 2021, 45(2): 9-22. 

  [35] FARINA A, BELGRANO A. The eco-field: a new paradigm for landscape ecology[J]. Ecological research, 2004, 19(1): 107-110. 

  [36] MULLET T C, FARINA A, GAGE S H. The acoustic habitat hypothesis: an ecoacoustics perspective on species habitat selection[J]. Biosemiotics, 2017, 10(3): 319-336. 

  [37] FARINA A. Rural sanctuary: an ecosemiotic agency to preserve human cultural heritage and biodiversity[J]. Biosemiotics, 2018, 11(1): 139-158. 

  [38] 赵向东 . 名象何曾定可稽 , 毕竟同归天一寥 [D]. 天津 : 天津大学 , 2012. 

  [39] 何昉 . 从心理场现象看中国园林美学思想 [J]. 中国园林 , 1989(3): 20-27. 

  [40] 许砚梅 , 官悦 . 格式塔心理学视角下的文人园林审美解读——以网师园为例 [J]. 西部人居环境学刊 , 2019, 34(1): 81-86. 

  [41] 徐苏斌 . 风水说中的心理场因素 [M] // 王其亨 . 风水理论研究 . 天津 : 天津大学出版社 , 1999: 107-115. 

  [42] 赖世刚 . 复杂城市系统规划理论架构 [J]. 城市发展研究 , 2019, 26(5): 8-11. 

  [43] BINGOL E. From figure ground patterns to field conditions: understanding the recent urbanism[J]. Building material, 2020(23): 133-148. 

  [44] LAPKA M, CUDLINOVA E. Integrating nature, culture, and society: the concept of landscape field[J]. Ekologia Bratislava, 2001, 20(1): 125-138. 

  [45] 王贵祥 . 东西方的建筑空间 [M]. 天津 : 百花文艺出版社 , 2006: 244. 

  [46] CAO T Y. Conceptual developments of 20th century field theories[M]. Cambridge University Press, 1998: 15-16, 90, 99-102, 365-367.