Chen Lu, Zhou Jianyun, Pang Xiaomei

Keywords： Zoning; Hybrid Zoning; Land Use; Control Tools; Transformation; Los Angeles

Abstract：

Los Angeles’s zoning has important pioneering significance in land use control in the United States. By tracing the origin and historical evolution of zoning and the transformation of the new hybrid zoning for Los Angeles, this paper lays a foundation for a more comprehensive understanding of American zoning to clarify the differences between planning and zoning. The Los Angeles’s zoning shows the development of land use control tools in the United States, which expanded from nuisance ordinances, from incomplete zoning to comprehensive zoning. The zoning for Los Angeles has gradually transformed from the early tools of direct land use control into control tools for implementing planning objectives. Its new comprehensive zoning is a dynamic, web-based hybrid partition system, which is the control carrier to achieve multiple objectives and has high advanced nature. As a technical tool for space control, zoning and its experience in Los Angeles can provide reference for the law-based management of spatial planning in China.

Funds：

• [1] 王丰龙, 刘云刚, 陈倩敏, 等. 范式沉浮——百年来西方城市规划理论体系的建构[J]. 国际城市规划, 2012, 27(1): 75-83.

  [2] CULLINGWORTH B, CAVES R W, CULLINGWORTH J B, et al. Planning in the USA: Policies, issues, and processes[M]. Routledge, 2013.

  [3] 于洋. 纽约市区划条例的百年流变（1916—2016）——以私有公共空间建设为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2016, 31(2): 98-109.

  [4] FLUCK T A. Euclid v. Ambler: a retrospective[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1986, 52(3): 326-337.

  [5] 薄力之. 美国区划法对于建设强度管控的措施与经验——以纽约为例[J]. 北京规划建设, 2017, 173(2): 34-43.

  [6] 孙骅声, 蔡建辉. 美国纽约市区划决议（1993 年修订本）的几个特点[J]. 国外城市规划, 1998(4): 41-42.

  [7] 王卉, 谭纵波, 刘健. 美国纽约市建筑高度控制方法探析[J]. 国际城市规划, 2016(1): 93-99.

  [8] 李强, 王珊. 纽约的分区制及其启示[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2005(5): 95-97.

  [9] 彭飞飞. 美国的城市区划法[J]. 国际城市规划, 2009, 24( 增刊1): 69-72.

  [10] 阳建强. 美国区划技术的发展（上）[J]. 城市规划, 1992(6): 49-52.

  [11] WEISS M A,WARD D, ZUNZ O. Density and intervention: New York’s planning traditions[M] // The landscape of modernity: essays on New York City, 1900-1940. Russell Sage Foundation, 1992: 46-75.

  [12] KOLNICK K A. Order before zoning: land use regulation in Los Angeles, 1880-1915[M]. University of Southern California, 2008.

  [13] WEISS M A. The rise of the community builders: the American real estate industry and urban land planning[M]. Beard Books, 2002.

  [14] FISCHLER R. The metropolitan dimension of early zoning: revisiting the 1916 New York City Ordinance[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1998, 64(2): 170-188.

  [15] 李恒. 美国区划发展历史研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2007.

  [16] HIRT S A. Zoned in the USA: the origins and implications of American land-use regulation[M]. Cornell University Press, 2015.

  [17] 王卉. 妨害视角下的城市土地用途控制探析——以美国为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2015, 30( 增刊1): 23-28.

  [18] WHITTEMORE A. The regulated city: the politics of land use regulation in Los Angeles, 1909-2009[M]. University of California, Los Angeles, 2010.

  [19] BASSETT E M. Zoning: the laws, administration, and court decisions during the first twenty years[M]. Russell Sage Foundation, 1940.

  [20] 周剑云, 黎淑翎, 戚冬瑾, 等.《 1961 纽约区划则例》立法目的及其实施路线[J]. 城市规划, 2020, 44(10): 102-113.

  [21] WHITTEMORE A H. Zoning Los Angeles: a brief history of four regimes[J]. Planning perspectives, 2012, 27(3): 393-415.

  [22] 戚冬瑾, 周剑云. 基于形态的条例——美国区划改革新趋势的启示[J]. 城市规划, 2013, 37(9): 67-75.

  [23] BURDETTE J T. Form-based codes: a cure for the cancer called Euclidean Zoning?[D]. Blacksburg, Virginia: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2004.

  [24] McDOUGAL III L L. Performance standards: a viable alternative to Euclidean zoning[J]. Tulane law review, 1972, 47: 255.

  [25] 黄明华, 赵阳, 高靖葆, 等. 规划与规则——对控制性详细规划发展方向的探讨[J]. 城市规划, 2020, 44(11): 52-57, 87.

  [26] 周剑云, 戚冬瑾. 从规划语言学层面再认识城市用地分类体系[J]. 城市规划, 2018, 42(10): 34-41.

  [27] 陈璐, 周剑云. 语言学视角下的规划、分区及分区代码研究[J/OL]. 城市规划, 2022[2022-04-24]. https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.scut.edu.cn/kcms/detail/11.2378.TU.20220421.1203.002.html.