Zhou Zihang, Zhang Jingxiang, Yang Jieying

Keywords： State-level New Area ； Risk Society ； Governance ； Urban Entrepreneurialism ； Jiangbei New Area

Abstract：

Starting from the institutional background and governance characteristics of state-level new areas, this paper discusses its governance structure and local administrative power distribution. It enrolls risk society theory to establish an analytical framework among the administrative power, social capital and governance risks, with the aim of examining new areas’ potential risks of governance failure. Focusing on the relationship between risk distribution and the empowerment from upper government, through the empirical study of the governance pattern of Nanjing Jiangbei New Area, it demonstrates three examples of the selection of a coffee shop site, the Jiangbei International Health City project, and the mixed-development of substation. This paper also analyzes its governance system and intergovernmental power distribution and figures out logic of local government’s actions, which aims to enhancing governance benefits and eliminating risk. This paper then discusses the dilemma of affairs and power in the era of risk society. Based on this, it proposes three measures to balance risks and benefits, including: (1) using market toolkits to depoliticize governance risks; (2) reasonable distribution of powers and risks; (3) constructing the circuit breaker mechanism of local administrative power.

Funds：

• [1] 张京祥, 赵丹, 陈浩. 增长主义的终结与中国城市规划的转型[J]. 城市规划, 2013, 37(1): 45-50, 55.

  [2] 贾康, 刘微, 张立承, 等. 我国地方政府债务风险和对策[J]. 经济研究参考, 2010(14): 2-28.

  [3] WU F. Planning centrality, market instruments: governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism[J]. Urban studies, 2018, 55(7): 1383-1399.

  [4] 晁恒, 林雄斌, 李贵才. 尺度重构视角下国家级新区“多规合一”的特征与实现途径[J]. 城市发展研究, 2015, 22(3): 11-18.

  [5] 王佃利, 于棋, 王庆歌. 尺度重构视角下国家级新区发展的行政逻辑探析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016(8): 41-47.

  [6] SHEN J. Scale, state and the city: urban transformation in post-reform China[J]. Habitat international, 2007, 31(3): 303-316.

  [7] 张京祥. 国家—区域治理的尺度重构: 基于“国家战略区域规划”视角的剖析[J]. 城市发展研究, 2013, 20(5): 45-50.

  [8] FARMER S. Cities as risk managers: the impact of Chicago’s parking meter P3 on municipal governance and transportation planning[J]. Environment and planning a, 2014, 46(9): 2160-2174.

  [9] 乌尔里希·贝克. 风险社会[M]. 何博闻, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2004.

  [10] 陈东, 孔维锋. 新地域空间——国家级新区的特征解析与发展对策[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2016, 31(1): 118-125.

  [11] 谢广靖, 石郁萌. 国家级新区发展的再认识[J]. 城市规划, 2016, 40(5): 9-20.

  [12] 郭小碚, 张伯旭. 对开发区管理体制的思考和建议——国家级经济技术开发区调研报告[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2007(10): 9-14.

  [13] 赵晓冬, 王伟伟, 吕爱国. 国家级经济技术开发区管理体制类型研究[J]. 中国行政管理, 2013(12): 56-59.

  [14] 殷洁, 罗小龙, 肖菲. 国家级新区的空间生产与治理尺度建构[J]. 人文地理, 2018, 33(3): 89-96.

  [15] 冯奎, 闫学东, 郑明媚, 等. 中国新城新区发展报告: 2016[M]. 北京: 企业管理出版社, 2016.

  [16] 冯奎, 闫学东, 郑明媚, 等. 中国新城新区发展报告: 2017[M]. 北京: 企业管理出版社, 2017.

  [17] 王召刊. 国家级新区治理体系创新研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2018.

  [18] 聂翔宇, 刘新静. 城市化进程中“鬼城”的类型分析及其治理研究[J]. 南通大学学报( 社会科学版), 2013, 29(4): 111-117.

  [19] BECK U. World at risk: the new task of critical theory[J]. Development and society, 2008, 37(1): 1-21.

  [20] HARVEY D. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism[J]. Geografiska Annaler: series b, human geography, 1989, 71(1): 3-17.

  [21] PHELPS N A, MIAO J T. Varieties of urban entrepreneurialism[J]. Dialogues in human geography, 2020, 10(3): 304-321.

  [22] LAUERMANN J. Municipal statecraft: revisiting the geographies of the entrepreneurial city[J]. Progress in human geography, 2018, 42(2): 205-224.

  [23] BECK U. Global generations in world risk society[J]. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 2008(82/83): 203-216.

  [24] 林毅夫. 转型国家需要有效市场和有为政府[J]. 中国经济周刊, 2014(6): 78-79.

  [25] 刘熙瑞. 服务型政府——经济全球化背景下中国政府改革的目标选择[J]. 中国行政管理, 2002(7): 5-7.