Jiang Huaxiong

Keywords： Complexity; Planning Support Systems; PSS Implementation Gap; A Socio-Technical Approach; Smart City Planning

Abstract：

Urban planning is a highly complex human activity that requires appropriate planning support techniques to assist planners in performing specific planning tasks. Various information technologies in different periods of Western society have been developed and applied to the urban planning field, which finally crystallized as “Planning Support Systems”(PSS). PSS are geo-based information technology that includes a set of components to collectively support specific planning tasks. However, for a long time, the development of PSS in Western urban planning has witnessed “PSS implementation gap”, that is, many PSS have been developed by academic circles or technology companies, but their application in planning practice is quite insufficient and limited. Understanding this issue will help to reveal PSS development trajectory of Western urban planning over the past two decades. Thus, this paper aims to outline the theoretical background, practical reasons, and solutions of PSS implementation gap, and sketch new development trends of PSS in Western urban planning. From this, this paper provides constructive suggestions for the development and application of planning support in the Chinese urban planning context.

Funds：

• [1] DE ROO G, HILLIER J. Complexity and planning: Systems, assemblages and simulations[M]. New York: Routledge, 2016.

  [2] ZELLNER M, Campbell S D. Planning for deep-rooted problems: what can we learn from aligning complex systems and wicked problems?[J]. Planning theory & practice, 2015, 16(4): 457-478.

  [3] RITTEL H W J, WEBBER M M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning[J]. Policy sciences, 1973, 4(2): 155-169.

  [4] KLOSTERMAN R E. Planning support systems: a new perspective on computer-aided planning[J]. Journal of planning education and research, 1997, 17(1): 45-54.

  [5] BATTY M. Planning support systems and the new logic of computation[J]. Regional development dialogue, 1995, 16(1): 1-17.

  [6] GEERTMAN S. PSS: Beyond the implementation gap[J]. Transportation research part a: policy and practice, 2017, 104: 70-76.

  [7] GEERTMAN S. Planning support: from systems to science[J]. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-urban design and planning, 2013, 166(1): 50-59.

  [8] GEERTMAN S, Stillwell J. Planning support science: challenges, themes and applications[M] // GEERTMAN S, STILLWELL J, eds. Handbook of planning support science. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020: 1-20.

  [9] GEERTMAN S. Potentials for planning support: a planning-conceptual approach[J]. Environment and planning b: planning and design, 2006, 33(6): 863-880.

  [10] PETTIT C, BAKELMUN A, LIESKE S N, et al. Planning support systems for smart cities[J]. City, culture and society, 2018, 12: 13-24.

  [11] SILVA C, BERTOLINI L, TE BR?MMELSTROET M, et al. Accessibility instruments in planning practice: bridging the implementation gap[J]. Transport policy, 2017, 53: 135-145.

  [12] VONK G, GEERTMAN S, SCHOT P. Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems[J]. Environment and planning a, 2005, 37(5): 909-924.

  [13] BEAUREGARD R A. Planning practice[J]. Urban geography, 1986, 7(2): 172-178.

  [14] BEAUREGARD R A. Progress report: the object of planning[J]. Urban geography, 1987, 8(4): 367-373.

  [15] HARRIS B. Plan or projection: an examination of the use of models in planning[J]. Journal of the american institute of planners, 1960, 26(4): 265-272.

  [16] SIMON H A. Theories of bounded rationality[J]. Decision and organization, 1972, 1(1): 161-176.

  [17] FALUDI A. A reader in planning theory[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2013.

  [18] FRIEDMANN J. The future of comprehensive urban planning: a critique[J]. Public administration review, 1971, 31(3): 315-326.

  [19] FRIEDMANN J. Planning in the public domain: from knowledge to action[M]. Princeton, N J: Princeton University Press, 1987.

  [20] BRAIL R K, KLOSTERMAN R E. Planning support systems: integrating geographic information systems, models, and visualization tools[M]. Redlands, CA: ESRI, Inc., 2001.

  [21] DOBESCH H, DUMOLARD P, DYRAS I, eds. Spatial interpolation for climate data: the use of GIS in climatology and meteorology[M]. Hoboken, N J: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

  [22] MYSIAK J, GIUPPONI C, ROSATO P. Towards the development of a decision support system for water resource management[J]. Environmental modelling & software, 2005, 20(2): 203-214.

  [23] GEERTMAN S, STILLWELL J. Planning support systems: content, issues and trends[M] // GEERTMAN S, STILLWELL J, eds. Planning support systems best practice and new methods. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009: 1-26.

  [24] BATTY M. Planning support systems: technologies that are driving planning[M] // GEERTMAN S, STILLWELL J, eds. Planning support systems in practice. Berlin: Springer, 2003: 5-8.

  [25] BRAIL R K. Planning support systems evolving: when the rubber hits the road[M] // PORTUGALI J, eds. Complex artificial environments. Berlin: Springer, 2006: 307-317.

  [26] GEERTMAN S, STILLWELL J. Planning support systems: an inventory of current practice[J]. Computers, environment and urban systems, 28(4): 291-310.

  [27] STILLWELL J, HAYES J, DYMOND-GREEN R, et al. Access to UK census data for spatial analysis: towards an integrated census support service[M] //GEERTMAN S, TOPPEN F, STILLWELL J, eds. Planning support systems for sustainable urban development. Berlin: Springer, 2013: 329-348.

  [28] INNES J E, SIMPSON D M. Implementing GIS for planning lessons from the history of technological innovation[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1993, 59(2): 230-236.

  [29] STILLWELL J, GEERTMAN S, OPENSHAW S, eds. Geographical information and planning: European perspectives[M]. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 1999.

  [30] VONK G A. Improving planning support: the use of planning support systems for spatial planning[M]. Utrecht: KNAG/Netherlands Geographical Studies, 2006.

  [31] PELZER P, GEERTMAN S, VAN DER HEIJDEN R, et al. The added value of planning support systems: a practitioner’s perspective[J]. Computers, environment and urban systems, 2014, 48: 16-27.

  [32] RUSSO P, LANZILOTTI R, COSTABILE M F, et al. Towards satisfying practitioners in using planning support systems[J]. Computers, environment and urban systems, 2018, 67: 9-20.

  [33] VONK G, LIGTENBERG A. Socio-technical PSS development to improve functionality and usability-sketch planning using a maptable[J]. Landscape and urban planning, 2010, 94(3-4): 166-174.

  [34] TE BR?MMELSTROET M, SILVA C, BERTOLINI L. COST Action TU1002-Assessing usability of accessibility instruments[M]. Brussels: COST, 2014.

  [35] GEERTMAN S, ALLAN A, PETTIT C, et al. Planning support science for smarter urban futures[M]. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017.

  [36] VONK G, GEERTMAN S. Improving the adoption and use of planning support systems in practice[J]. Applied spatial analysis and policy, 2008, 1(3): 153-173.

  [37] PELZER P. Usefulness of planning support systems: conceptual perspectives and practitioners’ experiences[D]. Groningen: InPlanning, 2015.

  [38] IANG H, GEERTMAN S, WITTE P. Avoiding the planning support system pitfalls? what smart governance can learn from the planning support system implementation gap[J]. Environment and planning b: urban analytics and city science, 2020: 2399808320934824.

  [39] VONK G, GEERTMAN S. Knowledge-based planning using planning support systems: practice-oriented lessons[M] // YIGITCANLAR T, ed. Creative urban regions: harnessing urban technologies to support knowledge city initiatives. IGI Global, 2008: 203-217.

  [40] NIELSEN J. Usability Engineering[M]. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1993.

  [41] PELZER P. Usefulness of planning support systems: a conceptual framework and an empirical illustration[J]. Transportation research part a: policy and practice, 2017, 104: 84-95.

  [42] TE BR?MMELSTROET M. A critical reflection on the experimental method for planning research: testing the added value of PSS in a controlled environment[J]. Planning practice and research, 2015, 30(2): 179-201.

  [43] CHAMPLIN C, TE BR?MMELSTROET M, PELZER P. Tables, tablets and flexibility: evaluating planning support system performance under different conditions of use[J]. Applied spatial analysis and policy, 2019, 12(3): 467-491.

  [44] PELZER P, GEERTMAN S, VAN DER HEIJDEN R. A comparison of the perceived added value of PSS applications in group settings[J]. Computers, environment and urban systems, 2016, 56: 25-35.

  [45] ARCINIEGAS G, JANSSEN R, RIETVELD P. Effectiveness of collaborative map-based decision support tools: results of an experiment[J]. Environmental modelling & software, 2013, 39: 159-175.

  [46] ZHANG L, GEERTMAN S, HOOIMEIJER P, et al. The usefulness of a web-based participatory planning support system in Wuhan, China[J]. Computers, environment and urban systems, 2019, 74: 208-217.

  [47] JIANG H, GEERTMAN S, WITTE P. Ignorance is bliss? an empirical analysis of the determinants of PSS usefulness in practice[J]. Computers, environment and urban systems, 2020, 83: 101505.

  [48] VONK G, GEERTMAN S, SCHOT P. A SWOT analysis of planning support systems[J]. Environment and planning a, 39(7): 1699-1714.

  [49] JIANG H, GEERTMAN S, WITTE P. Smartening urban governance: an evidence-based perspective[J]. Regional science policy & practice, 2020. DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12304

  [50] TE BR?MMELSTROET M. Performance of planning support systems: what is it, and how do we report on it?[J]. Computers, environment and urban systems, 2013, 41: 299-308.

  [51] TE BR?MMELSTROET M. Equip the warrior instead of manning the equipment: land use and transport planning support in the Netherlands[J]. Journal of transport and land use, 2010, 3(1): 25-41.

  [52] SILVA C, PATATAS T, AMANTE A. Evaluating the usefulness of the structural accessibility layer for planning practice–planning practitioners’perception[J]. Transportation research part a: policy and practice, 2017, 104: 137-149.

  [53] JIANG H, GEERTMAN S, WITTE P. Comparing smart governance projects in China: a contextual approach[M] // GEERTMAN S, ZHAN Q, ALLAN A, et al, eds. Computational urban planning and management for smart cities. Cham: Springer, 2019: 99-114.

  [54] GEERTMAN S. Planning support systems (PSS) as research instruments[M] // SILVA E A, HEALEY P, HARRIS N, et al. The Routledge handbook of planning research methods. London: Routledge, 2015.

  [55] BATTY M. Can it happen again? planning support, Lee’s Requiem and the rise of the smart cities movement[J]. Environment and planning b: planning and design, 2014, 41(3): 388-391.

  [56] BATTY M, AXHAUSEN K W, GIANNOTTI F, et al. Smart cities of the future[J]. The European physical journal special topics, 2012, 214(1): 481-518.

  [57] GEERTMAN S, GOODSPEED R, STILLWELL J, eds. Planning support systems and smart cities[M]. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2015.

  [58] KITCHIN R, MCARDLE G. What makes big data, big data? exploring the ontological characteristics of 26 datasets[J]. Big data & society, 2016, 3(1): 2053951716631130.