Zhou Xiang, Liu Xuanxuan, Sun Zeyi

Keywords： Digital Footprint; Application Scenario; Passive Mode and Active Mode; Spatial Structure; Service Experience

Abstract：

Based on the social reality of “being digital”, this paper points out that the application scope of digital footprint has been expanded under the premise of continuous coupling and co-evolving between the global economic form and information interaction technology. On the basis of categorizing digital footprint into passive and active application types, this paper studies the development course and value characteristics of digital footprint. The results show that the current application scenarios of digital footprints mainly focus on seven research fields, and illustrating the trend of cross-field overlapping and multidisciplinary integration. Among them, there are mainly two research types in the urban field: one is the research on urban spatial structure led by passive digital footprint; the other is the research on urban service experience led by active digital footprint. The former includes urban transportation, regional structure, population flow and environmental evaluation, while the latter involves recreational service, experience perception and function coordination. Based on the analysis of the limitations of utilizing the single type of digital footprint, it is proposed that the comprehensive application of the two types of digital footprint will become an important trend of urban research in the future. The authors argue that classifying and analyzing the application scenarios and innovation prospects of digital footprint will help to improve the richness and vitality of urban space research.

Funds：

• [1] NEGROPONTE N. Being digital[M]. New York: Vintage Books, 1995.

  [2] PINE B J, GILMORE J H. The experience economy[M]. Brighton: Harvard Business Review Press, 2011.

  [3] 孙智中 , 张晨 . 基于厚数据的信息分析：内涵与模式 [J]. 情报资料工作 , 2020, 41(3): 69-75.

  [4] 刘畅 . 网人合一：从 Web1.0 到 Web3.0 之路 [J]. 河南社会科学 , 2008（2）:137-140.

  [5] SALAS-OLMEDO M H, MOYA-GóMEZ B, GARCíA-PALOMARES J C, et al. Tourists’digital footprint in cities: comparing big data sources[J]. Tourism management, 2018, 66:13-25.

  [6] OSBORNE N, CONNELLY L. Managing your digital footprint[J]. ALISS quarterly, 2015, 11: 22-26.

  [7] GIRARDIN F, CALABRESE F, FIORE F D, et al. Digital footprinting: uncovering tourists with user-generated content[J]. IEEE pervasive computing, 2009, 7(4): 36-43.

  [8] GIRARDIN F. Catching the world’s eyes[M] // OFFENHUBER D, RATTI C. eds. Decoding the city: urbanism in the age of big data[M]. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag AG, 2014.

  [9] ROSE G, WILLIS A. Seeing the smart city on Twitter: colour and the affective territories of becoming smart[J]. Environment and planning d: society and space, 2018, 37(3): 411-427.

  [10] STOCK K. Mining location from social media: a systematic review[J]. Computers, environment and urban systems, 2018, 71(5): 209-240.

  [11] DOURISH P. Re-space-ing place[C] // Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2006: 299-308.

  [12] KONG C, GAO M, XU C, et al. Entity matching across multiple heterogeneous data sources[C] // International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications, 2016: 133-146.

  [13] ARYA V, SETHI D, PAUL J. Does digital footprint act as a digital asset? enhancing brand experience through remarketing[J]. International journal of information management, 2019, 49: 142-156.

  [14] OENDER I, KOERBITZ W, HUBMANN-HAIDVOGEL A. Tracing tourists by their digital footprints: the case of Austria[J]. Journal of travel research, 2016, 55(5): 566-573.

  [15] TU W, LI Q, FANG Z, et al. Optimizing the locations of electric taxi charging stations: a spatial-temporal demand coverage approach[J]. Transportation research part c, 2016, 65: 172-189.

  [16] TU W, CAO R, YUE Y, et al. Spatial variations in urban public ridership derived from GPS trajectories and smart card data[J]. Journal of transport geography, 2018, 69: 45-57.

  [17] LOUAIL T, LENORMAND M, CANTU ROS O, et al. From mobile phone data to the spatial structure of cities[J]. Scientific reports, 2014, 4(1): 1-14.

  [18] ZHANG Y, MARSHALL S, CAO M, et al. Discovering the evolution of urban structure using smart card data: the case of London[J]. Cities, 2021, 112(3): 103-157.

  [19] ZHOU Y, FANG Z, THILL J C, et al. Functionally critical locations in urban transportation network: identification and space-time analysis using trajectories[J]. Computers, environment and urban systems, 2015, 52: 34-47

  [20] ZENG C, YANG L, DONG J. Management of urban land expansion China through intensity assessment: a big data perspective[J]. Journal cleaner production, 2017, 153: 637-647.

  [21] 钟炜菁 , 王德 . 基于居民行为周期特征的城市空间研究 [J]. 地理科学进展 , 2018, 37(8): 98-110.

  [22] YABE T, TSUBOUCHI K, SEKIMOTO Y. City flow fragility: measuring fragility of people flow in cities to disasters using GPS data collected from smartphones[J]. Proceedings of the ACM on interactive mobile wearable ubiquitous technologies, 2017, 1(3): 1-17.

  [23] 谢栋灿 , 王德 , 钟炜菁 , 等 . 上海市建成环境的评价与分析 ：基于手机信令数据的探索 [J]. 城市规划 , 2018, 42(10): 103-114, 126.

  [24] HE Q, HE W, SONG Y, et al. The impact of urban growth patterns urban vitality in newly built-up areas based on an association rules analysis using geographical‘big data’[J]. Land use policy, 2018, 78: 726-738.

  [25] 李渊 , 郑伟民 , 王德 . 景区旅游者空间行为研究综述 [J]. 旅游学刊 , 2018, 33(4): 103-112.

  [26] VU H, LI G, LAW R, et al. Exploring the travel behaviors of inbound tourists to Hong Kong using geotagged photos[J]. Tourism management, 2015, 46: 222-232.

  [27] WALDEN-SCHREINER C, LEUNG Y, TATEOSIAN L. Digital footprints: incorporating crowdsourced geographic information for protected area management[J]. Applied geography, 2018, 90: 44-54.

  [28] 梁保尔 , 潘植强 . 基于旅游数字足迹的目的地关注度与共现效应研究——以上海历史街区为例 [J]. 旅游学刊 , 2015, 30(7): 80-90.

  [29] 唐佳薇 . 基于旅游照片的湖南省国家森林公园游客景观偏好研究 [D]. 湖南 : 中南林业科技大学 , 2018.

  [30] 李渊 , 高小涵 , 黄竞雄 , 等 . 基于摄影照片与眼动实验的旅游者视觉行为分析——以厦门大学为例 [J]. 旅游学刊 , 2020, 35(9): 41-52.

  [31] 邓宁 , 刘耀芳 , 牛宇 , 等 . 不同来源地旅游者对北京目的地形象感知差异——基于深度学习的 Flickr 图片分析 [J]. 资源科学 , 2019, 41(3): 416-429.

  [32] 张琳 , 朱文一 . 抖音短视频空间意象初探——以三处重庆网红打卡地为例 [J]. 城市设计 , 2020, 1: 36-45.

  [33] 朱钟炜 . 基于社交媒体数据的城市绿地景观满意度评价方法 [D]. 北京 : 北京大学 , 2020.

  [34] 刘震 , 戴泽钒 , 楼嘉军 , 等 . 基于数字足迹的城市游憩行为时空特征研究——以上海为例 [J]. 世界地理研究 , 2019, 28(5): 95-105.

  [35] TóTH G, WACHS J, DI CLEMENTE R. et al. Inequality is rising where social network segregation interacts with urban topology[J]. Nature communications, 2021, 12(1): 1-9.

  [36] 秦萧 , 甄峰 , 朱寿佳 , 等 . 基于网络口碑度的南京城区餐饮业空间分布格局研究——以大众点评网为例 [J]. 地理科学 , 2014, 34(7): 810-817.

  [37] 潘碧麟 , 王江浩 , 葛咏 , 等 . 基于微博签到数据的成渝城市群空间结构及其城际人口流动研究 [J]. 地球信息科学学报 , 2019, 21(1): 68-76.

  [38] CALABRESE F, FERRARI L, BLONDEL V. Urban sensing using mobile phone network data: a survey of research[J]. ACM computing surveys, 2014, 47(2): 1-20.

  [39] GRAHAM M, ZOOK M. Augmented realities and uneven geographies: exploring the geolinguistic contours of the web[J]. Environment & planning a, 2013, 45(1): 77-99.

  [40] 陈圆圆 . 上海市公共活动中心空间绩效及影响因素研究 [J]. 上海国土资源 , 2019, 40(3): 13-19.

  [41] 陈筝 , 刘颂 . 基于可穿戴传感器的实时环境情绪感受评价 [J]. 中国园林 , 2018, 34(3): 12-17.