Hong Qianhui, Chen Yulin

Keywords： Informal Settlements; Inclusive Governance; Urban Regeneration; Implementation Mechanism; Brazil

Abstract：

In the context of the transformation of informal settlements governance in China, this paper proposes an analytical framework of “spatial inclusion - institutional inclusion - implementation inclusion” based on the concept of inclusiveness, and takes Sao Paulo, Brazil, which is successful in informal settlements upgrading, as an example. Based on the review of the governance process of informal settlements in Sao Paulo, its implementation mechanism of inclusive governance is summarized: in the spatial dimension, a comprehensive governance system has been built, including favela, informal subdivisions, tenements and public housing estates; in the institutional dimension, the formalization of informal housing is promoted by ensuring land use rights, delineating special areas of social interest, obtaining funds from multiple parties, and building a project coordination platform; in the implementation dimension, all-round and whole process strategies have been adopted to improve survival, development, and social conditions. Finally, suggestions are put forward for the governance of informal settlements in China, including improving the spatial pedigree of informal housing, integrating informal housing into the urban public housing system, and adopting informal housing governance countermeasures that pay equal attention to spatial improvement and social development.

Funds：

• [1] UN-habitat. The challenge of slums: global report on human settlements, 2003[M]. UK & USA: Earthscan Publications Ltd., 2003.

  [2] 张磊 . “新常态”下城市更新治理模式比较与转型路径 [J]. 城市发展研究 , 2015, 22(12): 57-62.

  [3] YUAN D, YAU Y, BAO H. A framework for understanding the institutional arrangements of urban village redevelopment projects in China[J]. Land use policy, 2020, 99: 104998.

  [4] 韦长传 , 仝德 , 袁玉玺 , 等 . 城中村研究热点及区域差异——基于CiteSpace 的文献计量分析 [J]. 地域研究与开发 , 2022, 41(3): 68-74. 

  [5] 张理政 , 叶裕民 . 城中村更新治理 40 年 ：学术思想的演进与展望 [J]. 城市规划 , 2022, 46(5): 103-114.

  [6] 冯晓英 . 论北京“城中村”改造 ：兼述流动人口聚居区合作治理 [J]. 人口研究 , 2010, 34(6): 55-66.

  [7] WU F, ZHANG F, WEBSTER C. Informality and the development and demolition of urban villages in the Chinese Peri-urban Area[J]. Urban studies, 2013, 50(10): 1919-1934.

  [8] 比什·桑亚尔 . 发展中国家非正规住房市场的政策反思 [J]. 国际城市规划 , 2019, 34(2): 15-22. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2018.551.

  [9] 叶裕民 , 张理政 , 孙玥 , 等 . 破解城中村更新和新市民住房“孪生难题”的联动机制研究——以广州市为例 [J]. 中国人民大学学报 , 2020, 34(2): 14-28.

  [10] 万成伟 , 于洋 . 公共产品导向 ：多中心治理的城中村更新——以深圳水围柠盟人才公寓为例 [J]. 国际城市规划 , 2021, 36(5): 138-147.DOI: 10.19830/j.upi.2019.402.

  [11] 文超 , 杨新海 , 文剑钢 , 等 . 基于“城市针灸”的城中村有机更新模式探究 [J]. 城市发展研究 , 2017, 24(11): 43-50.

  [12] 卢文杰 , 程佳佳 , 方菲雅 . 广州市城中村微改造行动规划探索——以仑头村为例 [J]. 城市发展研究 , 2020, 27(5): 94-100.

  [13] 魏立华 , 闫小培 .“城中村”：存续前提下的转型——兼论“城中村”改造的可行性模式 [J]. 城市规划 , 2005(7): 9-13, 56.

  [14] 田莉 . 从城市更新到城市复兴 ：外来人口居住权益视角下的城市转型发展 [J]. 城市规划学刊 , 2019(4): 56-62.

  [15] 张理政 , 叶裕民 . 城中村更新治理 40 年 ：学术思想的演进与展望 [J]. 城市规划 , 2022, 46(5): 103-114.

  [16] 姚之浩 , 田莉 , 范晨璟 , 等 . 基于公租房供应视角的存量空间更新模式研究 ：厦门城中村改造的规划思考 [J]. 城市规划学刊 , 2018(4): 88-95.

  [17] 楚建群, 赵辉, 林坚. 应对城市非正规性:城市更新中的城市治理创新[J]. 规划师 , 2018, 34(12): 122-126.

  [18] 缪春胜 , 覃文超 , 水浩然 . 从大拆大建走向有机更新，引导城中村发展模式转型——以《深圳市城中村 ( 旧村 ) 综合整治总体规划 (2019—2025)》编制为例 [J]. 规划师 , 2021, 37(11): 55-62.

  [19] 张艳 , 朱潇冰 , 瞿琦 , 等 . 深圳市城中村综合整治的整体统筹探讨 [J]. 现代城市研究 , 2021(10): 36-42.

  [20] ALI I. ZHUANG J. Inclusive growth toward a prosperous Asia: policy implications[R]. Asian Development Bank, 2007.

  [21] The World Bank. World inclusive cities approach paper[R]. 2015.

  [22] The World Bank, Development Research Center of the State Council, the People’s Republic of China. Urban China: toward efficient, inclusive, and sustainable urbanization[M/OL]. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2014 [2022-09-01]. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/18865.

  [23] 叶裕民 . 特大城市包容性城中村改造理论架构与机制创新——来自北京和广州的考察与思考 [J]. 城市规划 , 2015, 39(8): 9-23.

  [24] 徐勤贤 , 窦红 . 巴西政府对城市低收入阶层住房改造的做法和启示 [J]. 城市发展研究 , 2010, 17(9): 121-126.

  [25] 李明烨 , 亚历克斯·马格尔哈斯 . 从城市非正规性视角解读里约热内卢贫民窟的发展历程与治理经验 [J]. 国际城市规划 , 2019, 34(2): 56-63. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2017.203.

  [26] 陈天 , 王佳煜 , 石川淼 . 巴西贫民窟协作式规划对我国城中村治理的启示——以贝洛奥里藏特市为例 [J/OL]. 国际城市规划 , 2023(3): 116-125. DOI:10.19830/j.upi.2021.500.

  [28] IBGE. Censo Demográfico 2010 Aglomerados subnormais: primeiros resultados[M]. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, 2010: 19.

  [29] MARQUES E, SARAIVA C. Urban integration or reconfigured inequalities? analyzing housing precarity in S?o Paulo, Brazil[J]. Habitat international, 2017, 69: 18-26.

  [30] UN Habitat. 2012 Scroll of honour winners[EB/OL]. [2023-05-30]. https://unhabitat.org/scroll-of-honour.

  [31] MARQUES E. S?o Paulo in the twenty-first century: spaces, heterogeneities, inequalities[M]. Abingdon: Routledge, 2016.

  [32] HERLING T, FRAN?A E. Social housing in S?o Paulo: challenges and new management tools[R]. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2009.

  [33] PASTERNAK S. Loteamentos irregulares no município de S?o Paulo: uma avalia??o espacial urbanística[J]. Planejamento e políticas públicas, 2010(34): 131-170.

  [34] Cities Alliance. Integrating the poor: urban upgrading and land tenure regularisation in the city of Sao Paulo[EB/OL]. [2023-05-28]. https://www.  citiesalliance.org/sites/default/files/CA_Docs/chapter-2%5B2%5D.pdf.

  [35] BUDDS J, TEIXEIRA P. Ensuring the right to the city: pro-poor housing, urban development and tenure legalization in S?o Paulo, Brazil[J]. Environment and urbanization, 2005, 17(1): 89-114.

  [36] Presidência da República. Lei no 6.766, de 19 de Dezembro de 1979[EB/OL]. [2022-02-27]. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l6766.htm.

  [37] Prefeitura de S?o Paulo. Lei no 7.805 de 1 de Novembro de 1972[EB/OL]. [2022-08-04]. https://legislacao.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/leis/lei-7805-de-01-de-novembro-de-1972.

  [38] OYEYINKA O. S?o Paulo: a tale of two cities[M]. Nairobi: UN-Habitat, 2010: 108-144.

  [39] Prefeitura de S?o Paulo. Lei no 10.928 de 8 de Janeiro de 1991[EB/OL]. [2022-08-04]. https://legislacao.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/leis/lei-10928-de-08-de-janeiro-de-1991.

  [40] Presidência da República. Constitui??o da república federativa do Brasil de 1988[EB/OL]. [2022-02-27]. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao/Constituicao.htm.

  [41] Presidência da República. Lei no 10.257, de 10 de Julho de 2001[EB/OL]. [2022-02-27]. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/LEIS_2001/L10257.htm.

  [42] Presidência da República. Medida provisória no 2.220, de 4 de Setembro de 2001[EB/OL]. [2022-02-27]. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/MPV/2220.htm.

  [43] Prefeitura de S?o Paulo. Lei no 16.050 de 31 de Julho de 2014[EB/OL]. [2022-02-27]. http://legislacao.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/leis/lei-16050-de-31-de-julho-de-2014/.

  [44] Cidade de S?o Paulo. Projeto de Revis?o do Plano Diretor Estratégico[EB/OL]. [2023-05-28]. https://gestaourbana.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/arquivos/mapas_pde/Mapas/04_ZEIS/PDF.zip.

  [45] FRAN?A E, COSTA K P, CYRILLO M O V. Vila Nilo[M]. S?o Paulo: Secretaria Municipal de Habita??o, 2011.

  [46] Prefeitura de S?o Paulo. Decreto no 33.189, de 17 de Maio de 1993[EB/OL]. [2022-08-04]. https://legislacao.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/leis/decreto-33189-de-17-de-maio-de-1993.

  [47] Programa 3 R’s reduz inadimplência nos conjuntos Cingapura[EB/OL]. (2005-05-16)/[2023-05-28]. https://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cidade/secretarias/habitacao/noticias/?p=4273.

  [48] Cidade de S?o Paulo Habitac?o. Urbaniza??o de Favelas: A Experiência de S?o Paulo[M]. S?o Paulo: Boldarini Arquitetura e Urbanismo, 2008.

  [49] CDHU, Governo do Estado de S?o Paulo. Relatório Geral do Programa de atua??o em corti?os[R/OL]. [2022-08-04]. https://www.cdhu.sp.gov.br/documents/20143/37069/RelatorioGeralProgramaCorticos.pdf/cef12342-5419-23a0-bf8c-95360484fe86.

  [50] 陈宇琳 . 中国大城市非正规住房与社区营造 ：类型、机制与应对 [J]. 国际城市规划 , 2019(2): 40-46. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2019.052.