DOI:
After Rural Planning: The Obligatory Passage Phenomenon of Rural Operation by State-owned Enterprises and the Paradox Towards Sustainability

Dou Lanyu, Shen Mingrui

Keywords: Rural Revitalization; State-owned Enterprises Going Down to Countryside; Rural Governance; Obligatory Passage Point; Sustainable Development

Abstract:

The rural program and planning entering the countryside filled the hollow of rural governance and spawned a boom in rural physical construction. The accumulation of government funds in the countryside formed considerable assets, and the focus of rural revitalization has shifted from “rural construction” to “rural operation”. The feature of the government being short of market operation creates a need to introduce market entities, but the profit-seeking nature of market entities makes it difficult for them to undertake benefit mitigation. The state-owned enterprise is an important tool for the government to realize the market-oriented operation of projects, so it becomes a new choice for rural operation subjects between the government and the market. Taking Qianjiadu in Jiangning District of Nanjing as a typical case, this paper points out that the stated-owned enterprise operating model village project became the obligatory passage point, opened a window for governance and reconstruction, led Qianjiadu to go through two stages of space construction and asset operation, and realized rural material renewal and asset revitalization. This paper reveals that after state-owned enterprises went to the countryside, a stable governance structure with economic and social separation has been formed in Qianjiadu, but there remain problems of unsustainable rural development caused by the dilemma of business models and the loss of village collective autonomy.


Funds:

Brief Info of Author(s):

References:
  • [1] LIU Y, LI Y. Revitalize the world’s countryside[J]. Nature, 2017, 548(7667): 275-277.

    [2] 张京祥 , 申明锐 , 赵晨 . 乡村复兴 :生产主义和后生产主义下的中国乡村转型 [J]. 国际城市规划 , 2014, 29(5): 1-7.

    [3] 申明锐 , 张京祥 . 新型城镇化背景下的中国乡村转型与复兴 [J]. 城市规划 , 2015, 39(1): 30-34, 63.

    [4] 周飞舟 . 从汲取型政权到“悬浮型”政权——税费改革对国家与农民关系之影响 [J]. 社会学研究 , 2006(3): 1-38, 243.

    [5] 渠敬东 . 项目制 :一种新的国家治理体制 [J]. 中国社会科学 , 2012(5): 113-130, 207.

    [6] 叶敏 , 李宽 . 资源下乡、项目制与村庄间分化 [J]. 甘肃行政学院学报 , 2014(2): 14-21, 125.

    [7] 折晓叶 , 陈婴婴 . 项目制的分级运作机制和治理逻辑——对“项目进村”案例的社会学分析 [J]. 中国社会科学 , 2011(4): 126-148, 223.

    [8] 申明锐. 乡村项目与规划驱动下的乡村治理——基于南京江宁的实证[J]. 城市规划 , 2015, 39(10): 83-90.

    [9] 焦长权 , 周飞舟 .“资本下乡”与村庄的再造 [J]. 中国社会科学 , 2016(1): 100-116, 205-206.

    [10] 孙莹 , 张尚武 . 乡村建设的治理机制及其建设效应研究——基于浙江奉化四个乡村建设案例的比较 [J]. 城市规划学刊 , 2021(1): 44-51.

    [11] 郭清岁 . “项目下乡”模式的治理困境及对策研究 [D]. 福州 : 福建师范大学 , 2016.

    [12] 申明锐 , 张京祥 . 政府项目与乡村善治——基于不同治理类型与效应的比较 [J]. 现代城市研究 , 2017(1): 2-5.

    [13] 王勇 , 李广斌 . 苏南乡村集中社区建设类型演进研究——基于乡村治理变迁的视角 [J]. 城市规划 , 2019, 43(6): 55-63.

    [14] 王克 . 南京江宁 :国企下乡担当“拓荒者”和“铺路石”[J]. 中国经济周刊 , 2017(27): 76-77.

    [15] 黄速建 , 余菁 . 国有企业的性质、目标与社会责任 [J]. 中国工业经济 , 2006(2): 68-76.

    [16] AHLERS A L, SCHUBERT G. Strategic modelling:“building a new socialist countryside”in three Chinese counties[J]. China quarterly, 2013, 216: 831-849.

    [17] 赵燕菁 , 宋涛 . 地权分置、资本下乡与乡村振兴——基于公共服务的视角 [J]. 社会科学战线 , 2022(1): 41-50, 281-282.

    [18] 申明锐. 从乡村建设到乡村运营——政府项目市场托管的成效与困境[J]. 城市规划 , 2020, 44(7): 9-17.

    [19] WEI S J, XIE Z, ZHANG X. From“Made in China”to“Innovated in China”: necessity, prospect, and challenges[J]. Nber Working Papers, 2016, 31(1): 49-70.

    [20] 贺雪峰 , 印子 . “小农经济”与农业现代化的路径选择——兼评农业现代化激进主义 [J]. 政治经济学评论 , 2015, 6(2): 45-65.

    [21] 周 应 恒 , 胡 凌 啸 . 中 国 农 民 专 业 合 作 社 还 能 否 实 现“ 弱 者 的 联合”?——基于中日实践的对比分析 [J]. 中国农村经济 , 2016(6): 30-38.

    [22] CALLON M. The sociology of an actor-network: the case of the electric vehicle[M] // CALLON M, LAW J, RIP A. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London: Macmillan Press, 1986: 19-34.

    [23] 姚金伟 , 马大明 , 罗猷韬 . 项目制、服务型政府与制度复杂性 :一个尝试性分析框架 [J]. 人文杂志 , 2016(4): 29-36.

    [24] 折晓叶 . 县域政府治理模式的新变化 [J]. 中国社会科学 , 2014(1): 121-139, 207.

    [25] FENG Y, WU F, ZHANG F. Shanghai municipal investment corporation: extending government power through financialization under state entrepreneurialism[J]. Environment and planning c: politics and space, 2023, 41(1): 20-36.

    [26] 龙花楼 . 论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展 [J]. 地理科学进展 , 2012, 31(2): 131-138.

    [27] 汤爽爽 , 郝璞 , 黄贤金 . 大都市边缘区农村居民对宅基地退出和定居的思考——以南京市江宁区为例 [J]. 人文地理 , 2017, 32(2): 72-79.

    [28] 刘守英 , 熊雪锋 . 产权与管制——中国宅基地制度演进与改革 [J]. 中国经济问题 , 2019(6): 17-27.

    [29] 石欣欣 , 胡纹 , 孙远赫 . 可持续的乡村建设与村庄公共品供给——困境、原因与制度优化 [J]. 城市规划 , 2021, 45(10): 45-58.

    [30] 陆文荣 , 卢汉龙 . 部门下乡、资本下乡与农户再合作——基于村社自主性的视角 [J]. 中国农村观察 , 2013(2): 44-56, 94-95.

    [31] 付翠莲 . 我国乡村治理模式的变迁、困境与内生权威嵌入的新乡贤治理 [J]. 地方治理研究 , 2016(1): 67-73.


TOP 10