[1] ALLMENDINGER P, HAUGHTON G, KNIELING J, et al. Soft Spaces in Europe: re-negotiating governance, boundaries and borders[M]. Oxon: Routledge, 2015.
[2] 中共中央国务院. 关于建立更加有效的区域协调发展新机制的意见[R]. (2018)[2022-12-21]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-11/29/content_5344537.htm.
[3] 广东省发展改革委. 广东省开发区总体发展规划(2020—2035 年)[R]. (2020)[2022-12-21]. http://www.gd.gov.cn/gdywdt/bmdt/content/post_3011094.html.
[4] 郭磊贤, 吴唯佳. 基于空间治理过程的特大城市外围跨界地区空间规划机制研究[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2019(6): 8-14. DOI: 10.16361/j.upf.201906001.
[5] 陈宏胜, 李志刚, 肖扬, 等. 基于区域功能视角的边界新区发展研究——对深圳前海合作区与珠海横琴合作区的比较[J]. 城市规划, 2022, 46(4): 21-29.
[6] 周凌. 特大城市边缘区空间演化机制与对策的实例剖析——以上海为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2017, 235(3): 85-94.
[7] 廖开怀, 符蓝, Breitung Werner. 边界融合理论视角下的同城化研究——以广佛为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2021, 28(7): 115-123.
[8] 田莉, 吕传廷, 沈体雁. 城市总体规划实施评价的理论与实证研究——以广州市总体规划(2001-2010 年)为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2008(5): 90-96.
[9] 贺璟寰. Evaluation of plan implementation: peri-urban development and the Shanghai master plan 1999-2020[M]. Amsterdam: Architecture and the Built Environment Press, 2015.
[10] 孙施文, 冷方兴. 上海城市边缘区空间形态演变研究——以闵行区莘庄镇为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2017, 238(6): 16-24.
[11] 林雄斌, 杨家文. 新区域主义下跨市空间规划与多层级治理研究——以珠三角为例[J]. 中国公共政策评论, 2015(001): 131-149.
[12] 任思儒, 杨箐丛. 基于治理模式转变的跨界地区协同发展研究——以深港、深惠边界为例[C] // 面向高质量发展的空间治理——2020中国城市规划年会论文集(11 城乡治理与政策研究). 2021: 974-983. DOI: 10.26914/c.cnkihy.2021.037748.
[13] FALUDI A. Territorial cohesion and subsidiarity under the European Union treatyies: a critique of the ‘territorialism’ underlying[J]. Regional studies, 2013, 47: 1594-1606.
[14] 陈德宁, 吴康敏, 吴家瑜, 等. 欧盟跨边界合作研究对粤港澳大湾区协同治理的启示[J]. 热带地理, 2022, 42(2): 283-292. DOI: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003435.
[15] 马里奥· 赖默, 帕纳约蒂斯·格蒂米斯, 汉斯·布洛特福格尔. 欧洲空间规划体系与实践:比较视角下的延续与变革[M]. 贺璟寰, 译. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2022.
[16] 罗德里克·邓肯·麦肯齐. 大都市社区[M]. 叶涯剑, 张汉娇, 译. 上海: 上海三联书店, 2017.
[17] 殷为华, 沈玉芳, 杨万钟. 基于新区域主义的我国区域规划转型研究[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2007(5): 12-15, 47.
[18] 叶林. 新区域主义的兴起与发展:一个综述[J]. 公共行政评论, 2010, 3(3): 175-189, 206.
[19] 于立, 姚瑞, 曹曦东, 等. 区域规划的必要性与困境:从英格兰废止“区域空间战略”所引发的思考[J]. 城市发展研究, 2021, 28(4): 14-21, 28.
[20] NEWMAN J. Modernising governance: new labour, policy and society[M]. London: Sage Publications, 2001.
[21] 叶裕民, 王晨跃. 城市治理研究范式转移与一般分析框架创新[J]. 城市规划, 2022, 46(2): 42-52, 99.
[22] ALLMENDINGER P, HAUGHTON G. Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries and metagovernance: the new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway[J]. Environment and planning a, 2009, 41(3): 617-633.
[23] MAGGETTI M. Hard and soft governance[M] // LYNGGAARD K, MANNERS I, L?FGREN K. Research methods in European Union Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015: 252-265.
[24] OLIVEIRA E. Editorial for virtual special issue: the emergence of new forms of flexible governance arrangements in and for urban regions: an European perspective[J]. Regional studies, regional science, 2017, 4(1): 1-6.
[25] THOMAS K, LITTLEWOOD S. From green belts to green infrastructure? the evolution of a new concept in the emerging soft governance of spatial strategies[J]. Planning practice & research, 2010, 25: 2, 203-222. DOI: 10.1080/02697451003740213.
[26] METZGER J, SCHMITT P. When soft spaces harden: the EU strategy for the Baltic Sea Region[J]. Environment and planning a, 2012, 44(2): 263-280.
[27] EVERS D, TENNEKES J. The Europeanisation of Spatial Planning in the Netherlands[R]. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2016.
[28] EDUARDO M, ed. European territorial cooperation: theoretical and empirical approaches to the process and impacts of cross-border and transnational cooperation in Europe[M]. London: Springer, 2018: 111-113.
[29] 熊灵, 覃操, 龚晨. 跨境经济合作的运行机制与管理模式——欧盟INTERREG的经验及对中国的启示[J]. 边界与海洋研究, 2017, 2(3): 41-58.
[30] SIELKER F. The European Commission’s proposal for a cross-border mechanism (ECBM): potential implications and perspectives[J]. Journal of property, planning and environmental law, 2018, 10(3): 219-239. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPPEL-08-2018-0024.
[31] NADIN V, MALDONADO F, ZONNEVELD W, et al. Comparative analysis of territorial governance and spatial planning systems in Europe[R/OL]. (2018)[2022-12-11]. https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/1.%20COMPASS_Final_Report.pdf.
[32] GLOERSEN E, WERGLES N, CORBINEAU C, et al. ESPON ACTAREA: Thinking and planning in areas of territorial cooperation[R]. Luxembourg: ESPON EGTC, 2017.
[33] ALTES W. Rules versus ideas in landscape protection: is a Green Heart attack imminent?[J]. International planning studies, 2018, 23: 1, 1-15. DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2017.1321479.
[34] 周静, 沈迟. 荷兰空间规划体系的改革及启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2017, 32(3): 113-121. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2016.233.
[35] OECD. Territorial reviews: Randstad Holland, Netherlands[M]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2007.
[36] BALZ V E, ZONNEVELD W A M. Regional design in the context of fragmented territorial governance: South Wing Studio[J]. European planning studies, 2015, 23: 5, 871-891. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2014.889662.
[37] BALZ V E. Regional design: discretionary approaches to planning in the Netherlands[M]. Delft: Architecture and the built environment, 2019.
[38] COLLINGE C, BENTLEY G, DAMSGAARD O. RISE; Regional Integrated Strategies in Europe[R/OL]. (2013)[2022-12-30]. https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/RISE_Final_Report_Main_Report.pdf.
[39] 刘健. 法国国土开发政策框架及其空间规划体系——特点与启发[J]. 城市规划, 2011, 35(8): 60-65.
[40] 范冬阳, 李雯骐. 地方治理目标的呈现与实现——法国市镇联合体空间规划的传导与实施[J]. 国际城市规划, 2022, 37(5): 37-46. DOI: 10.19830/j.upi.2022.322.
[41] PATRICIA G, JULIEN S, PASCAL T, et al. Trajectories du Sillon Lorrain: éléments de Réflexion pour un Projet Stratégique[R]. (2020)[2023-04-11]. https://www.aguram.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/2020-01-Portrait-Sillon-Lorrain_HD.pdf.
[42] 张衔春, 栾晓帆, 李志刚.“ 城市区域”主义下的中国区域治理模式重构——珠三角城际轨道的实证[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(3): 483-494.