点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:2698
2015年第2期   DOI:
增长主义价值观转变背景下的收缩城市复兴策略比较——以美国与德国为例
A Comparison of the Strategies to Cope with Shrinkage in the USA and Germany: Under the Background of Transformation of Growth Orientation Values

李翔 陈可石 郭新

Li Xiang, Chen Keshi, Guo Xin

关键词:增长主义转变;收缩城市;旧区复兴

Keywords:Transformation of Growth Orientation Values; Shrinking Cities; Urban Renaissance

摘要:

近年来发达国家收缩城市现象日益严峻,且导致了日趋复杂的城市问题,逐步引起了专家学者对收缩问题的重视和应对。其中,美国和德国的应对策略颇具代表性。本文从分析美国与德国在应对收缩时所具有的不同价值观的背景入手,通过对克利夫兰和马格德堡不同的应对范式的比较研究发现:以美国为代表的大部分发达国家延续利用传统的增长主义价值范式应对收缩,通过刺激性投资项目的建设带动城市不断增长,却导致收缩效应的强化;而德国率先转变收缩价值观——采用关注城市存量空间的精简主义价值取向,应对收缩取得良好效果。通过此比较性视角研究,本文希望为我国正确认识城市收缩现象——转变传统增长主义价值观提供思路和借鉴,并冀图从中得到我国复兴收缩城市的有益启示。


Abstract:

In recent years, the phenomenon of shrinking cities in developed counties has become continuously severe, which led to increasingly complex urban problems. More experts, therefore, began to focus on the strategies to deal with shrinkage, which in the United States and Germany are fairly representative. This paper starts to analyze the background of different values of these two countries in response to the shrinkage, and compares the approaches to shrinkage within the cities of Cleveland (the USA) and Magdeburg (Germany). Findings show that most developed countries, including the United States, continued to deal with shrinkage in the use of traditional growth orientation paradigm, which intensified the negative consequences of shrinkage, while Germany took the lead to values shift - followed a more citywide strategy of downsizing and achieved good results. Through the comparative overview of the paradigm of the USA and Germany, the paper suggests a new transatlantic cognition of shrinkage and new enlightenment to restructure shrinking cities in China.


版权信息:
基金项目:
作者简介:

李翔,北京大学深圳研究生院,硕士研究生。leavingcity@gmail.com

陈可石,北京大学深圳研究生院,教授,博士生导师。chenks@pkusz.edu.cn

郭新,奥斯陆建筑设计学院,硕士研究生。keke3944863@gmail.com


译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] 杨东峰, 殷成志. 如何拯救收缩的城市:英国老工业城市转型经验及

    启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2013(6): 50-56.

    [2] Oswalt P, Rienitz T. Atlas of Shrinking Cities[M]. Ostfildern: Hatje Crantz, 2006.

    [3] EU Urban Audit[R/OL]. 2007. http://www.urbanaudit.org.

    [4] Pallagst K, Wiechmann T. Shrinking Smart - Processes of Urban Shrinkage

    in the USA[M]. Jahrbuch Stadtregion, 2004/05.

    [5] Oswalt P. Shrinking Cities. Vol. 1: International Research[M]. Ostfildern:

    HatjeCrantz, 2005.

    [6] Herfert G, Lentz S. New Spatial Patterns of Population Development as a

    Factor in Restructuring Eastern Germany[M] // Lentz S, ed. Restructuring

    Eastern Germany. German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy. Berlin,

    Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2007.

    [7] 董楠楠. 浅析德国经济萎缩地区的城市更新[J]. 国际城市规划, 2009,

    24(1): 103-106.

    [8] Siedentop S, Einig K, G?ssel J, Kausch S. Siedlungsstrukturelle

    Ver?nderungenim Umland der Agglomerationsr?ume[M]. Bonn:

    Bundesamtfür Bauwesen und Raumordnung, 2003.

    [9] Shetty S, Reid N. Global Challenges and Local Responses: Creating a

    New Urban World in the Shrinking Cities of the US Industrial Midwest[J].

    Regional Science Policy & Practice, 2013, 5(2): 201-217.

    [10] William Bridges. Managing Spatial Transition[J]. Organizational

    Dynamics, 1986, 15(1): 24-33.

    [11] Wiechmann T, Pallagst K M. Urban Shrinkage in Germany and the USA: A

    Comparison of Transformation Patterns and Local Strategies[J]. International

    Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2012, 36(2): 261-280.

    [12] Molotch H. The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of

    Place[J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 1976, 82(2): 309-32.

    [13] Gallagher J. Re-imagining Detroit: Opportunities for Redefining an

    American City[M]. Detroit: MI, 2010.

    [14] Brandstetter B, Lang T, Pfeifer A. Umgang mit der Schrumpfenden Stadt

    — ein Debattenüberblick[J]. Berliner Debatte Initial, 2005, 16: 55-68.

    [15] Glock B, H?u?ermann H. New Trends in Urban Development and Public

    Policy in Eastern Germany: Dealing with the Vacant Housing Problem at

    the Local Level[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,

    2004: 919-29.

    [16] Nicholas C Zingale and Deborah Riemann. Coping with Shrinkage in

    Germany and the United States: A Cross-cultural Comparative Approach

    Toward Sustainable Cities[J]. Urban Design international, 2013, 1: 90-98.

    [17] Cleveland Planning Commission. Connecting Cleveland 2020. City Wide

    Plan[R/OL]. 2010. http://planning.city.cleveland.oh.us/census/factsheets/

    spa08.pdf.

    [18] Euclid Corridor Transportation Project Cleveland and East Cleveland,

    OH. Landscape Architecture Online[R/OL]. http://www.asla.org/meetings/

    awards/awds01/euclid.html.

    [19] Cleveland Planning Commission. Detroit Shoreway Neighborhood Plan

    Summary[R/OL]. 2010. http://planning.city.cleveland.oh.us/cwp/pdf/det.pdf.

    [20] IBA Office. IBA Urban Redevelopment[R/OL]. 2010. http://www.ibastadtumbau.

    de/index.php?iba2010-en.

    [21] Magdeburg - Living Beside and with the Elbe[R/OL]. 2010. http://www.

    iba-stadtumbau.de/index.php?magdeburg-en.

    [22] 黄毅, 佟晓光. 中国人口老龄化现状分析[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2012,

    21: 4853-4855.

    [23] 张京祥, 赵丹, 陈浩. 增长主义的终结与中国城市规划的转型[J]. 城市

    规划, 2013(1): 45-50.

《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

7789196