宋彦 唐瑜 丁国胜 陈燕萍

Song Yan, Tang Yu, Ding Guosheng, Chen Yanping

关键词：规划文本评估；内在有效性；外在有效性；评估方法

Keywords：Plan Document Evaluation; Internal Validity; External Validity; Assessment Methods

摘要：

本文以美国城市总体规划文本评估为例，探讨规划文本评估的内容和方法：在内容上，规划文本评估主要考察其内在有效性和外在有效性两方面；在方法上，规划文本评估标准计分表是规划文本评估的重要操作工具，“多方评估”是保证规划文本评估客观性和准确性的重要工作机制。文章进一步分析了我国当前城市规划编制在内在有效性和外在有效性两方面存在的问题，建议积极开展规划文本评估工作，将其作为规划审批和规划师审视日常工作的重要工具。

Abstract：

The article takes a case study of comprehensive planning document evaluation in the United States to reveal the content and methods of plan document evaluation. It is found that the content of plan document evaluation mainly focuses on the internal validity and external validity of plan formulation and on the methodology, planning document evaluation protocols can be an important tool for conducting a plan document evaluation and “multiparty jointed evaluation” can be an effective work mechanism to guarantee an objective and accurate evaluation result. It points out that there are still lots of problems in both internal validity and external validity of planning formulation in China. It also suggests that we should promote the plan document evaluation to make it as an important tool for planning approval and self-examination of planners in their daily work.

宋彦，北卡大学城市与区域规划系终身教授，北卡中国城市研究中心主任，深圳大学城市规划系主任。ys@email.unc.edu

唐瑜，深圳大学建筑与城市规划学院城乡规划系，硕士研究生。2120140616@email.szu.edu.cn

丁国胜，同济大学建筑与城市规划学院城市规划与设计专业博士研究生，美国北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校城市与区域规划系联合培养博士生。dingguoshengaaa@gmail.com

陈燕萍，深圳大学建筑与城市规划学院城乡规划系教授。chenypszu@163.com

• [1] Berke D Godschalk. Searching for the Good Plan: A Meta-Analysis of Plan

  Quality Studies[J]. Journal of Planning Literature, 2009, 23(3): 227-240.

  [2] 宋彦, 陈燕萍. 城市规划评估指引[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.

  [3] 宋彦, 江志勇, 杨晓春, 陈燕萍. 北美城市规划评估实践经验及启示[J].

  规划师, 2010, 26(3): 5-9.

  [4] Brody Samuel D. Are We Learning to Make Better Plans?: A Longitudinal

  Analysis of Plan Quality Associated with Natural Hazards[J]. Journal of

  Planning Education and Research, 2003, 23(2): 191-201.

  [5] Berke Philip R. Enhancing Plan Quality: Evaluating the Role of

  State Planning Mandates for Natural Hazard Mitigation[J]. Journal of

  Environmental Planning and Management, 1996, 39(1): 79-96.

  [6] Conroy Berke. What Makes a Good Sustainable Development Plan?:

  An Analysis of Factors that Influence Principles of Sustainable

  Development[J]. Environment and Planning A, 2004, 36(8): 1381-1396.

  [7] 张昊哲, 宋彦, 陈燕萍, 金广君. 城市总体规划的内在有效性评估探讨:

  兼谈美国城市总体规划的成果表达[J]. 规划师, 2010, 26(6): 59-64.

  [8] The City of New York. New York Master Plam 2008-2030[Z]. 2007.

  [9] 宋彦, 彭科. 城市总体规划促进低碳城市实现途径探讨: 以美国纽约市

  为例[J]. 规划师, 2011, 27(4): 94-99.

  [10] Song Y, Knaap G. Measuring Urban Form: Is Portland Winning the War

  on Sprawl?[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2004, 70(2):

  210-225.

  [11] Philip R Berke, Maria Manta Conroy. Are We Planning for Sustainable

  Development?: An Evaluation of 30 Comprehensive Plans[J]. APA Journal,

  2000, 66(1): 21-33.

  [12] 李智慧, 宋彦, 陈燕萍. 城市规划的外在有效性评估探讨: 以深圳市城

  市规划为例[J]. 规划师, 2010, 26(3): 25-30.

  
  

• 收起