点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:310
2016年第3期   DOI:
增长主义视角下的中国城市规划解读—— 评《为增长而规划:中国城市与区域规划》
Understanding Chinese Urban Planning in the Growth-first Politics:Based on a Review of Planning for Growth: Urban & Regional Planning in China

张京祥 陈浩

Zhang Jingxiang, Chen Hao

关键词:增长主义;城市与区域规划;规划范式;规划转型;中国

Keywords:Growth-first Politics; Urban and Regional Planning; Planning Paradigm; Planning Transition; China

摘要:

1990 年代的发展环境使得中国城市形成了增长主义发展模式。在此模式驱动下,中国城市规划形成了一种独特的逻辑和范式,吴缚龙教授在《为增长而规划:中国城市与区域规划》一书中将其理论化为“为增长而规划”。本文对“为增长而规划”范式的主要内容进行了解读,对该著作的学术贡献做了评述,并对作者书中的有关观点与重大问题进行了延伸思考。作者在书中提出的“为增长而规划”的范式,是对中国增长主义主导时代规划实践的一个系统性理论总结,揭示了当代中国城市规划的核心价值。但随着中国增长主义模式走向终结,“为增长而规划”范式的合法性基础正迅速消逝,建构多元目标和多元价值包容发展的规划新范式,应成为后增长主义时代中国规划重建的基本方向。

Abstract:

Since the 1990s, China has formed a growth-first mode of political economy. Under this political economic context, urban planning in China was dominated by a unique logic or paradigm which was distinct from the counter-parts in the western context. Professor Wu Fulong theorized the Chinese planning paradigm since the reform and opening-up as “planning for growth” in his latest book Planning for Growth: Urban and Regional Planning in China. This paper reviews the main arguments of Wu's book, and makes a commentary on the academic contributions the book will make to the Chinese academia of urban and regional planning. The paper also argues that the legitimacy of “planning for growth”is being challenged by great economic and social crisis, and the Chinese planning paradigm must be evolved to a more inclusive version.

版权信息:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金课题(51578276)资助
作者简介:

张京祥,南京大学建筑与城市规划学院教授,博士生导师。3593786@163.com

陈浩,南京大学建筑与城市规划学院助理研究员,博士。haochen@nju.edu.cn

译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] 张京祥, 赵丹, 陈浩. 增长主义的终结与中国城市规划的转型[J]. 城市规划, 2013(1): 45-50.
    [2] Leaf M, Li H. The “Third Spring” of Urban Planning in China: The Resurrection of Professional Planning in the Post-Mao Era[J]. China Information, 2006, 20(3): 553-585.
    [3] 张京祥. 国家—区域治理的尺度重构: 基于“国家战略区域规划”视角的剖析[J]. 城市发展研究, 2013, 20(5): 45-50.
    [4] Chen H, Zhang J, Li X, et al. Rescaling as a Leading National Transformation Project: Decoding State Rescaling in China’s Changing Central State-led Regional Planning[J]. China Review, 2014, 14(1): 97-124.
    [5] Mouffe C. On the Political[J]. Economy of Migration European Economic Review, 2005, 5(2): 284-295.
    [6] 汪晖. 去政治化的政治: 短20 世纪的终结与90 年代[M]. 北京:三联书店, 2008.
    [7] Castells M. City, Class and Power[M]. London: Macmillan, 1978.
    [8] Allmendinger P, Haughton G. Post-political Spatial Planning in England:A Crisis of Consensus?[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2012, 37(1): 89-103.

    [9] Aidan W, Jonas A E G, David G. The Environment and the Entrepreneurial City: Searching for the Urban “Sustainability; Fix” in Manchester and Leeds[J]. International Journal of Urban & Regional Research, 2004,
    28(28): 549-569.
    [10] Tretter E. Sustainability and Neoliberal Urban Development: The Environment, Crime and the Remaking of Austin’s Downtown[J]. Urban Studies, 2013, 50(11): 2222-2237.
    [11] 陈浩, 张京祥, 林存松. 城市空间开发中的“反增长政治”研究——基于南京“老城南事件”的实证[J]. 城市规划, 2015(4): 19-26.

《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

2190439