点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:1344
2016年第4期   DOI:10.22217/upi.2014.094
协调规划与市场的课题:英国简化规划区实践深析
Issue of Harmonizing Planning and Market: A Study on Simplified Planning Zone in the UK

杨建军 童心 陈巍

Yang Jianjun, Tong Xin, Chen Wei

关键词:英国;简化规划区;产业功能区

Keywords:The UK; Simplified Planning Zone; Industry Function Zone

摘要:

如何实现规划与市场的最佳分工是城市规划面临的永恒课题。尤其是在当下的国内社会经济转型时期,市场经济日趋成熟,城市规划迫切需要探索与市场机制相适应的创新与变革。现阶段,实体产业是城市经济的有力支撑,但刚性约束很强的规划不利于产业功能区适应市场变化的需要,因此很有必要重新审视规划与市场二者的协调关系,探讨规划如何改革以提供更好的发展环境。英国简化规划区的设立是20世纪80年代英国撒切尔政府简化规划、适应市场的一次重要改革,通过设立特殊功能区并在许可制下引入小范围区划的方式,避免政府对项目的过多干预带来的低效,同时强化了市场机制,促进了经济发展。本文还原简化规划区的制度原型,并深入分析制度性质和实践效果,进而借鉴简化规划区的经验,探索国内产业功能区适应市场的规划改革方向,从设立产业功能区、融合规划制度、制定开发导则等方面提出相应策略。

Abstract:

How to harmonize planning and market is the eternal subject of urban planning. Especially in current period, facing the social and economic transformation and the gradually mature market, city planning desperately needs to seek innovations and changes to adapt to the market mechanism. The real industry is the strong support of urban economy at this stage, but planning of rigid constraints does not match with the development of industry zone in the changing market environment. So it’s important to reexamine the relationship between planning and market and probe into reform of planning to provide better development environment. The establishment of Simplified Planning Zone (SPZ) in the UK was an important reform carried out by Thatcher Government to simplify planning in the 1980s. The way of inserting zoning in the permission system through establishing special function zones avoided the inefficiency caused by government’s excessive intervention of projects, strengthened the market mechanism and boosted the economic development. The paper restores the system prototype behind the SPZ, analyses SPZ’s system properties and practical effect, explores the reform in domestic industry function zone’s planning to adapt to the market based on the SPZ’s experience and puts forward the strategies of setting up industry function zone, integrating planning systems and formulating development guideline.

版权信息:
基金项目:
作者简介:

杨建军,浙江大学城乡规划设计研究院,院长;浙江大学建筑工程学院区域与城市规划系,教授。jjy@zju.edu.cn
童心,浙江省城乡规划设计研究院,规划师。tx0123@126.com
陈巍,浙江省城乡规划设计研究院,规划师。cw_lj15@163.com

译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] 朱介鸣. 市场经济下城市规划引导市场开发的经营[J]. 城市规划汇刊, 2005 (6): 11-15.
    [2] 胡瑜芝. 深化分类引导,强调弹性控制——浅谈《上海产业园区控制性详细规划成果规范及管理规定》[C]. 多元与包容——2012中国城市规划年会论文集(03 城市详细规划), 2012.
    [3] 肖莹光, 赵民. 英国城市规划许可制度及其借鉴[J]. 国外城市规划, 2005(04): 49-51.
    [4] 于立. 控制型规划和指导型规划及未来规划体系的发展趋势——以荷兰与英国为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2011(05): 56-65.
    [5] 李名扬, 孙翔. 城市土地利用控制开发许可制度比较研究——以英国、日本、中国为例[J]. 中国建设信息, 2005(17): 26-28.
    [6] 何明俊. 城乡规划效能监察中的申诉机制构建探讨[J]. 规划师, 2009(09): 10-15.
    [7] 于立. 规划督察:英国制度的借鉴[J]. 国际城市规划, 2007(02): 72-77.
    [8] 张险峰. 英国城乡规划督察制度的新发展[J].国外城市规划,2006(03): 25-27.
    [9] 冯晓星, 赵民. 英国的城市规划复议制度[J]. 国外城市规划, 2001(5).
    [10] 张俊. 英国的规划得益制度及其借鉴[J]. 城市规划, 2005(03): 49-54.
    [11] 于立, 杨睿. 英国规划控制管理制度与规划咨询业的作用分析[J]. 规划师, 2011(06): 20-24.
    [12] 郭倩. 行政规划中的公众参与制度研究——从中英城乡规划法制的比较切入[D]. 上海财经大学, 2010.
    [13] 唐子来. 英国城市规划核心法的历史演进过程[J]. 国外城市规划, 2000(01): 10-12, 43.
    [14] 孙施文. 英国城市规划近年来的发展动态[J]. 国外城市规划, 2005(06): 11-15.
    [15] 胡建淼, 何明俊. 英国《城乡规划法》百年变迁中的规划行政权[J]. 浙江学刊, 2010(04): 125-132.
    [16] O’Connor J. The Fiscal Crisis of the State[J]. Socialist Revolution, 1973(01).
    [17] Allmendinger P. Thatcherite Urban Planning and Politics: A Major Change[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1997, 21(1): 100-116.
    [18] Scruton R. The Meaning of Conservatism[M]. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1984.
    [19] 孙施文. 现代城市规划理论[M]. 中国建筑工业出版社, 2007.
    [20] 唐子来. 英国城市规划核心法的历史演进过程[J]. 国外城市规划, 2000(1):10-12.
    [21] 尼格尔泰勒. 1945年后西方城市规划理论的流变[M]. 李白玉, 陈贞, 译. 中国建筑工业出版, 2006: 126-131.
    [22] Planning Policy Guidance 5[Z]. Department of Environment, 1992.
    [23] Allmendinger P. Thatcherism and Planning-The Case of Simplified Planning Zones [M]. Ashgate, 1997.
    [24] Lloyd M. G. Simplified Planning Zones: The Privatization of Land Use Controls in the UK[J]. Land Use Policy, 1987, 4(1): 51-61.
    [25] Allmendinger P. Thatcherism and Simplified Planning Zones: An Implementation Perspective[J]. Planning Practice and Research, 1997, 12(2): 147-160.
    [26] Thornley A. Urban Planning Under Thatcherism: The Challenge of the Market[M]. London: Routledge, 1991.
    [27] Lloyd M G. Simplified Planning Zones: Land Development, and Planning Policy in Scotland[J]. Land Use Policy, 9: 249-258.
    [28] Blackhall J C. Simplified Planning Zones (SPZS) or Simply Political Zeal[J]. Journal of Planning and Environment Law, 1994: 117-23.
    [29] 巴里卡·林沃思. 英国城乡规划[M]. 张京祥, 译. 东南大学出版社, 2011.
    [30] Allmendinger P. Twilight Zones[J]. Planning Week, 1996(4): 14-15.
    [31] 马勇, 罗守贵, 崔馨予. 英格兰“当地企业合作伙伴(LEP)”解读——以东北英格兰LEP为例[J]. 华东科技, 2013(04): 70-72.
    [32] Homes and Communities Agency, Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, Department for Communities and Local Government, James Wharton MP, and The Rt Hon Greg Clark MP. Policy of Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) and Enterprise Zones[EB/OL]. (2014-06)[2010]
    https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/supporting-economic-growth-through-local-enterprise-partnerships-and-enterprise-zones.
    [33] 候丽. 美国“新”区划政策的评介[J]. 城市规划学, 2005(03): 36-42.
    [34] 李恒. 美国区划发展历史研究[D]. 清华大学工学硕士学位论文, 2007: 154. 

《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

7769177