点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:730
2016年第5期   DOI:10.22217/upi.2014.222
人与地区的整合——英国新工党以地区为基础的邻里再生及启示
Integration of People with Place: Policies and Inspirations of Area-based Neighbourhood Regeneration in England Under New Labour Party

程亮 王伟强

Cheng Liang, Wang Weiqiang

关键词:邻里再生;以地区为基础的措施;英国;规划启示

Keywords:Neighbourhood Regeneration; Area-based Initiatives; England; Planning Implication

摘要:

采用政策综述和文献研究相结合的方式,基于对英国新工党邻里再生政策中“人”和“地区”两个目标维度整合发展过程的分析,从“政策理性—干预尺度和模式—治理机制”的系统性角度,认为邻里社会融合与强化经济的积极协同、再生政策整合与多尺度干预、从合作伙伴到邻里赋权的治理形式等是其主要经验。针对中国发展实际,邻里再生的成功关键在于“人”与“地区”目标的整合、干预尺度扩展与多主体参与的实施体系,并有助于“人的城镇化”推动城乡发展的“新常态”政策的思考。


Abstract:

By reviewing of policies and literatures, this article analyzes the evolution of neighborhood regeneration policy in England since New Labor Party Era. According to the policy system of “rationality of policies - scale and mode of intervention - governance mechanism”, this article argues that the main experience is the coordination of social inclusion with economy growth, multi-scale of intervention, and governance from partnership to empowerment. Learning experience from England, it points out that the key to achieving success in neighborhood regeneration for China lies on the integration of the people-oriented with place-oriented policy objectives, the scale expansion of intervention, and the development of neighbourhood governance. It also benefits the thinking on “human urbanization” and urban-rural development of “new normal”.


版权信息:
基金项目:
作者简介:

程亮,同济大学建筑与城市规划学院,博士研究生。chengliang-up@hotmail.com

王伟强,同济大学建筑与城市规划学院高密度人居环境生态与节能教育部重点实验室,教授,博士生导师。wwq@tongji.edu.cn


译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] 彼得? 罗伯茨, 休? 塞克斯. 城市更新手册[M]. 叶齐茂, 倪晓晖, 译.

    北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.

    [2] 易晓峰. 从地产导向到文化导向——1980 年代以来的英国城市更新方

    法[J]. 城市规划, 2009, 33(6): 66-72.

    [3] 曲凌雁. 更新、再生与复兴——英国1960 年代以来城市政策方向变迁[J].

    国际城市规划, 2011, 26(1): 59-65.

    [4] 袁媛, 伍彬. 英国反贫困的地域政策及对中国的规划启示[J]. 国际城

    市规划, 2012, 27(5): 96-101.

    [5] Couch C, Sykes O, B?rstinghaus W. Thirty Years of Urban Regeneration

    in Britain, Germany and France: The Importance of Context and Path

    Dependency[J]. Progress in Planning, 2011, 75: 1-52.

    [6] DCLG: Department of Communities and Local Government. Transforming

    Places, Changing Lives: A Framework for Regeneration[R]. London:

    DCLG, 2008.

    [7] Hohmann R P. Regenerating Deprived Urban Areas: A Cross National

    Analysis of Area-based Initiatives[M]. Bristol: Policy Press, 2013.

    [8] Syrett S, North D. Renewing Neighbourhoods: Work, Enterprise and

    Governance[M]. Bristol: The Policy Press, 2008.

    [9] Lupton R, Fenton A, Fitzgerald A. Labour’s Record on Neighbourhood

    Renewal in England: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 1997-2010[EB/OL].

    (2013-07)[2014-06-12]. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/spcc/wp06.pdf.

    [10] Tallon A. Urban Regeneration in the UK[M]. 2nd ed. London and New

    York: Routledge, 2013.

    [11] Broughton K, Berkeley N, Jarvis D. Where Next for Neighbourhood

    Regeneration in England?[J]. Local Economy, 2011, 26(2): 82-94.

    [12] 佘高红. 从衰败到再生:城市社区衰退的理论思考[J]. 城市规划,

    2010, 34(11): 14-19.

    [13] Parker S. The Politics of Community: New Labour and the Eclipse of

    Society [M] // Clay C J, Madden M, Potts L, eds. Towards Understanding

    Community: People and Places. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007: 22-34.

    [14] Colantonio A, Dixon T. Urban Regeneration & Social Sustainability: Best

    Practice from European Cities[M]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2011.

    [15] Shaw K, Robinson E. UK Urban Regeneration Policies in the Early

    Twenty-first Century: Continuity or Change?[J], Town Planning Review,

    2010, 81: 123-149.

    [16] van Gent W P C, Musterd S, Ostendorf W. Disentangling Neighbourhood

    Problems: Area-based Interventions in Western European Cities[J]. Urban

    Research and Practice, 2009, 2(1): 53-67.

    [17] Bailey N. The Continuing Popularity of the Neighbourhood and

    Neighbourhood Governance in the Transition from the “Big State” to the

    “Big Society” Paradigm[J]. Environment and Planning C: Government

    and Policy, 2011, 29(5): 927-942.

    [18] 周志忍, 蒋敏娟. 整体政府下的政策协同:理论与发达国家的当代实

    践[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2010(6): 28-33.

    [19] 曲凌雁“. 合作伙伴组织”政策的发展与创新——英国城市治理经验[J].

    国际城市规划, 2013, 28(6): 73-81.

    [20] Lowndes V, Sullivan H. How Low Can You Go? Rationales and Challenges

    for Neighbourhood Governance[J]. Public Administration, 2008, 86(1): 53-74.

    [21] Pill M. Neighbourhood Initiatives in Wales and England: Shifting Purposes

    and Changing Scales[J]. People, Place and Policy Online, 2012, 6(2): 76-

    89.

    [22] 王婷, 于丹丹. 边缘社区更新的协作式规划路径——中国“城中村”

    改造和法国“ZUS”复兴比较研究[J]. 规划师, 2012, 28(2): 81-85.


《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

7767412