点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:0
2019年第4期   DOI:10.22217/upi.2017.228
英国规划评估体系研究及其对我国的借鉴意义
Research on British Planning Evaluation System and Its Reference to China

汪军 陈曦

Wang Jun, Chen Xi

关键词:英国;规划评估;体系研究;评估机构;评估主体;评估指导

Keywords:The UK; Planning Evaluation; Systematic Research; Evaluation Institution; Evaluation Subject; Evaluation Guidance

摘要:

随着规划评估工作在我国逐渐展开,对于评估理论方法和实施机制的研究越来越受重视。本文在系统介绍英国规划评估体系的发展及演变过程的基础上,对英国在不同阶段所采用的评估理念和方法进行了论述,提出了其在评估机构的设置和职能、评估主体的权力和责任以及其在典型的评估指导政策文件领域都具有较明显的特点,对我国全面建立规划评估体系具有显著的借鉴意义。基于这些论述,本文提出我国要在责任机制、技术指导、保障架构、结果使用等方面入手,建立完善的规划评估体系。

Abstract:

Along with the adoption of planning evaluation in China, research on the evaluation of theoretical methods and implementation mechanisms has received more and more attention. This paper systematically introduces the evolution of the British planning evaluation system, and analyzes the characteristics of the ideas and methods adopted at different stages. Through the study of the British planning evaluation system, this paper points out that it has obvious characteristics in the establishment and function of the evaluation institution, the power and responsibility of the evaluation subject, and in the field of typical evaluation guidance policy documents. It has significant reference for the comprehensive establishment of the planning evaluation system in China. Based on these discussions, this paper proposes that China should take efforts in terms of responsibility mechanism, technical guidance, guarantee framework, and use of results to establish a sound planning evaluation system.

版权信息:
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目(19BJY063),上海市设计学IV类高峰学科项目,华东理工大学深化教学改革项目, 创新创业课程建设项目
作者简介:

汪军,华东理工大学副教授,同济大学上海国际创新研究院副教授(兼)。denief@163.com
陈曦,绿地集团工程师。maigyscity@hotmail.com

译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] 宋彦, 黄斌, 陈燕萍, 等. 城市规划实施效果评估经验及启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2014(5): 83-88.
    [2] 周国艳. 西方城市规划有效性评价的理论范式及其演进[J]. 城市规划, 2012(11): 55-66.
    [3] 吴江, 王选华. 西方规划评估:理论演化与方法借鉴[J]. 城市规划, 2013(1): 90-96.
    [4] 苏建忠, 杨成韫. 英国和加拿大规划监测评估的最新进展及启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2015(5): 52-60.
    [5] 梁江, 穆丹, 孙晖. 荷兰国家基础设施与空间规划战略的评估与启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2014(6): 72-86.
    [6] 周艳妮, 姜涛, 宋晓杰, 等. 英国年度规划实施评估的国际经验与启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2016(3): 98-104.
    [7] 唐凯. 开展规划评估促进规划改革[J]. 城市规划, 2011(11): 9-10.
    [8] 郑德高, 闫岩. 实效性和前瞻性:关于总体规划评估的若干思考[J]. 城市规划, 2013(4): 37-42.
    [9] 马璇, 张一凡. 我国城市总体规划实施评估工作评析及建议——基于省市调研的若干思考[J]. 规划师, 2016(3): 34-41.
    [10] 施卫良. 对北京城市总体规划实施的几点思考[J]. 北京规划建设, 2012(1): 6-8.
    [11] 冯经明. 上海市城市总体规划实施评估若干问题的战略思考[J]. 上海城市规划, 2013(3): 6-10.
    [12] 赵民, 汪军, 刘峰. 关于城市总体规划实施评估的体系建构——以蚌埠市城市总体规划实施评估为例[J]. 上海城市规划, 2013(3): 18-22.
    [13] 程茂吉, 王波. 南京市城市总体规划实施评估及相关思考[J]. 现代城市研究, 2011(4): 88-94.
    [14] 汤海孺, 陈伟, 陈添明. 控制性详细规划实施评估报告编制方法初探[J]. 城市规划, 2015(S1): 86-90.
    [15] 桂明, 沈炜彬, 冯一军. 控规层面市政规划实施评估研究与实践——以杭州市钱江新城单元实践为例[J]. 城市规划, 2017(11): 39-44.
    [16] 叶祖达. 绿色生态城区控制性详细规划决策工具碳排放评估模型[J]. 城市发展研究, 2016(3): 76-86.
    [17] CULLINGWORTH J B, NADEN V. Town and country planning in the UK[M]. 12th ed. London: Routledge, 2006.
    [18] EDWARDS J, BATLEY R. The politics of positive discrimination: an evaluation of the urban programme 1967-1977[M]. London: Tavistock, 1978.
    [19] GRAY C. Government beyond the centre: sub-national politics in Britain[M]. London: Macmillan, 1994.
    [20] WOOD C, JONES C E. The effect of environmental assessment on UK local planning authority decisions[J]. Urban Studies, 1997(34): 1237-1257.
    [21] 张杰. 英国2004 年体系下发展规划实证研究——以英格兰地区为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2015(1): 86-93.
    [22] CHESTER D N. The report of the Fulton committee on the civil service[J]. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 1968, 27(4): 295-310.
    [23] GUBA E G, LINCOLN Y S. Fourth generation evaluation[M]. Newburry Park, CA: Sage, 1989.
    [24] KROSNICK J. Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys[J]. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1991(5): 213-236.
    [25] DAVOUDI S. Towards a conceptual framework for evaluating governance capacities in European polycentric urban regions[M] // MILLER D, PATASSINI D, eds. Beyond benefit cost analysis: accounting for non-market values in planning evaluation. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005: 277-294.
    [26] GRANT M. Planning law and the British planning system[J]. Town Planning review, 1992, 63(1): 3-12.
    [27] MCGREAL W S, ADAIR A S, BERRY J N, et al. Evaluation of the urban white paper fiscal measures[R]. HM Revenue & Customs, 2006.
    [28] HAWTIN M, PURCELL M. Process evaluation of plan rationalisation formative evaluation of community strategies[R]. Department for Communities and Local Government: London, 2008.
    [29] GIBBONS K, STEPHENS M. Evaluation of English housing policy 1975-2000[R]. London: Department for Communities & Local Government, 2005.
    [30] Interim evaluation of the coalfields regeneration programmes in England[R]. London: Department for Communities and Local Government, 2015.
    [31] Evaluating the impact of England’s regional development agencies: developing a methodology and evalua tion framework[R]. Occasional paper no. 2. London: Department of Trade and Industry, 2006.
    [32] BINGMAN C F. The concepts and structure of local government[R]. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1989.
    [33] Professional policy making for the 21 century[R]. London: Strategic Policy Making Team Cabinet Office, 1999.
    [34] The Green Book: appraisal and evaluation in central government[R]. London: HM Treasury, 2003.
    [35] BLAIR B T. Modernising government, UK Cabinet Office white paper[R]. London: UK Government, 2010.
    [36] The Magenta Book: guidance notes for policy evaluation and analysis[R]. London: HM Treasury, 2003 (renewal in 2007).
    [37] 汪军, 陈曦. 论城市规划的评估——概念、方法和西方的实践[J]. 国际城市规划, 2011(6): 78-84.

《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

3634281